Lessons from a Forgotten Disaster: The Queen Victoria Street Fire, 1902

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q4 AREA STUDIES London Journal Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1080/03058034.2021.1925414
S. Ewen, J. Reinarz
{"title":"Lessons from a Forgotten Disaster: The Queen Victoria Street Fire, 1902","authors":"S. Ewen, J. Reinarz","doi":"10.1080/03058034.2021.1925414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 9 June 1902, a fire at the General Electric Company offices in Queen Victoria Street led to the deaths of ten employees, including nine young women aged between 14 and 18. A coroner’s inquest was immediately organized to ascertain the cause of death and a number of witnesses were called to give evidence. This article explores the evidence gathered at the inquest, focusing on the testimony of four witnesses: the spectator, employee, survivor and fireman. Their testimony exposed defects in the company’s attitude towards fire safety, London’s building bye-laws and the capital’s fire protection. It subsequently weighs this evidence against other accounts of the fire as featured in newspapers and other contemporary texts. Our conclusions reveal significant variations between the coroner’s verdict and the media’s analysis of the fire, with particular focus given to accounts that sought to identify and hold to account those who were deemed publicly responsible for the failings to rescue the victims.","PeriodicalId":43904,"journal":{"name":"London Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03058034.2021.1925414","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03058034.2021.1925414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 9 June 1902, a fire at the General Electric Company offices in Queen Victoria Street led to the deaths of ten employees, including nine young women aged between 14 and 18. A coroner’s inquest was immediately organized to ascertain the cause of death and a number of witnesses were called to give evidence. This article explores the evidence gathered at the inquest, focusing on the testimony of four witnesses: the spectator, employee, survivor and fireman. Their testimony exposed defects in the company’s attitude towards fire safety, London’s building bye-laws and the capital’s fire protection. It subsequently weighs this evidence against other accounts of the fire as featured in newspapers and other contemporary texts. Our conclusions reveal significant variations between the coroner’s verdict and the media’s analysis of the fire, with particular focus given to accounts that sought to identify and hold to account those who were deemed publicly responsible for the failings to rescue the victims.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从被遗忘的灾难中吸取教训:维多利亚女王街大火,1902年
1902年6月9日,位于维多利亚女王街的通用电气公司办公室发生火灾,导致10名员工死亡,其中包括9名年龄在14至18岁之间的年轻女性。验尸官立即组织调查以确定死因,并传唤了一些证人作证。本文探讨了在审讯中收集的证据,重点是四名证人的证词:旁观者、雇员、幸存者和消防员。他们的证词暴露了该公司在消防安全、伦敦建筑细则和首都消防方面的态度缺陷。随后,它将这一证据与报纸和其他当代文本中对火灾的其他描述进行了权衡。我们的结论揭示了验尸官的裁决和媒体对火灾的分析之间的重大差异,特别关注那些试图确定并追究那些被认为对未能营救受害者负有公共责任的人的责任的报道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
London Journal
London Journal Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The scope of The London Journal is broad, embracing all aspects of metropolitan society past and present, including comparative studies. The Journal is multi-disciplinary and is intended to interest all concerned with the understanding and enrichment of London and Londoners: historians, geographers, economists, sociologists, social workers, political scientists, planners, educationalist, archaeologists, conservationists, architects, and all those taking an interest in the fine and performing arts, the natural environment and in commentaries on metropolitan life in fiction as in fact
期刊最新文献
Designs on Democracy: Architecture and the Public in Interwar London Designs on Democracy: Architecture and the Public in Interwar London . By N eal S hasore . Pp. xxvii + 432 + 142 illustrations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. £71.00. ISBN 978-0-19-284972-4. Hardback. Vagabonds: Life on the Streets of Nineteenth-Century London Vagabonds: Life on the Streets of Nineteenth-Century London . By O skar J ensen . Pp. 352. London: Duckworth Books, 2022. £20.00. ISBN 978071564392. Hardback. A Network of Contacts: Metropolitan Influences in the Delivery of Poor Relief in the London Hinterland (1778–1785) London Marine Insurance, 1438–1824: Risk, Trade, and the Early Modern State Nicholas Barbon: Developing London, 1667–1698
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1