Share-based incentives for South African CEOs: Trends 2002−2015

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE South African Journal of Accounting Research Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10291954.2017.1409869
G. Steenkamp, N. Wesson
{"title":"Share-based incentives for South African CEOs: Trends 2002−2015","authors":"G. Steenkamp, N. Wesson","doi":"10.1080/10291954.2017.1409869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Share-based incentives, which theoretically align executive and shareholders’ interests (agency theory), comprise a significant portion of executive remuneration. Detractors propose that such incentives could allow rent extraction (managerial power theory). To enable proper governance, stakeholders (both shareholders and regulators) need to be aware of the characteristics of share-based incentives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trends relating to executive share-based incentives, as well as the reliability of available data sources thereof, in South Africa. Firstly, a trend analysis (2002−2015) was done for companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Share options were the most popular share-based incentive until 2008, but were then replaced by share appreciation rights (SARs) and later by full quantum schemes (performance and restricted shares). Compared to global evidence, SARs were popular for longer and full quantum schemes became prevalent later in South Africa. Increased use of full quantum schemes in later years signal improved alignment of executive/shareholder interest (in line with the agency theory). This study, secondly, commented on the reliability of the IRESS financial database in recording share-based incentives, when compared to the annual financial statements (AFS). Numerous discrepancies in IRESS significantly detracted from its usefulness as a sole data source when evaluating executive share-based incentives. Divergent disclosure practices in the AFS increased the risk that executives in South Africa could be utilising share-based incentives to extract rents from companies. It is recommended that regulators should prescribe comprehensive standardised disclosure for share-based incentives.","PeriodicalId":43731,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"32 1","pages":"46 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10291954.2017.1409869","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2017.1409869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Share-based incentives, which theoretically align executive and shareholders’ interests (agency theory), comprise a significant portion of executive remuneration. Detractors propose that such incentives could allow rent extraction (managerial power theory). To enable proper governance, stakeholders (both shareholders and regulators) need to be aware of the characteristics of share-based incentives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trends relating to executive share-based incentives, as well as the reliability of available data sources thereof, in South Africa. Firstly, a trend analysis (2002−2015) was done for companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Share options were the most popular share-based incentive until 2008, but were then replaced by share appreciation rights (SARs) and later by full quantum schemes (performance and restricted shares). Compared to global evidence, SARs were popular for longer and full quantum schemes became prevalent later in South Africa. Increased use of full quantum schemes in later years signal improved alignment of executive/shareholder interest (in line with the agency theory). This study, secondly, commented on the reliability of the IRESS financial database in recording share-based incentives, when compared to the annual financial statements (AFS). Numerous discrepancies in IRESS significantly detracted from its usefulness as a sole data source when evaluating executive share-based incentives. Divergent disclosure practices in the AFS increased the risk that executives in South Africa could be utilising share-based incentives to extract rents from companies. It is recommended that regulators should prescribe comprehensive standardised disclosure for share-based incentives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非ceo的股权激励:2002 - 2015年趋势
基于股票的激励在高管薪酬中占很大比例,理论上使高管和股东的利益保持一致(代理理论)。批评者提出,这种激励措施可能会导致租金提取(管理权力理论)。为了实现适当的治理,利益相关者(股东和监管机构)需要意识到基于股票的激励的特点。这项研究的目的是评价南非有关以股份为基础的高管奖励的趋势及其现有数据来源的可靠性。首先,对在约翰内斯堡证券交易所上市的公司进行了趋势分析(2002 - 2015)。在2008年之前,股票期权是最受欢迎的基于股票的激励措施,但随后被股票增值权(sar)和后来的全量子计划(业绩和限制性股票)所取代。与全球证据相比,SARs流行的时间更长,全量子方案后来在南非流行起来。在后来的几年里,全量子方案的使用越来越多,这表明高管/股东利益的一致性得到了改善(符合代理理论)。其次,与年度财务报表(AFS)相比,本研究评论了IRESS财务数据库在记录基于股份的激励方面的可靠性。在评价基于股份的高管激励时,国际会计准则的许多差异大大削弱了其作为唯一数据来源的作用。AFS不同的信息披露做法增加了南非高管利用基于股票的激励机制从公司榨取租金的风险。建议监管机构对基于股票的激励措施进行全面的标准化披露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Impacts of corporate governance attributes on audit quality in emerging economies: The case of India A systematic literature review of blockchain technology and accounting issues: Is it a hype or hope? Is there a gender gap in audit fees in Spain? Explaining the variables involved in audit fees Deductibility of input tax on share issue costs in the context of the broad taxation principles Determinants of the effective tax rate: Board composition of South African firms listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1