“Long walk to 2030”: A bibliometric and systematic review of research trends on the UN sustainable development goal 3

Saheed Adekunle Raji , Michael Olusegun Demehin
{"title":"“Long walk to 2030”: A bibliometric and systematic review of research trends on the UN sustainable development goal 3","authors":"Saheed Adekunle Raji ,&nbsp;Michael Olusegun Demehin","doi":"10.1016/j.dialog.2023.100132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Since the initiation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by the United Nations in 2015, researchers worldwide have investigated various aspects of it. One of the key areas of interest is the third SDG, which focuses on health, with its series of indicators.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to analyze the contributions of academia by using bibliographic mapping to examine scholarly publications on SDG health from 2015 to 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed bibliographic data from The Lens database between 2015 and 2021 using Bibliometrix page and VOSviewer. Our analysis focused on scholarly productivity, bibliometric analysis, and geographic distribution of the outputs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We retrieved a total of 450 documents from The Lens database, with articles being the most dominant document typology at 99.8%. The mean age of the documents was 3.85 years, with a total of 18,440 citations. The mean citation per document was 40.98, and the mean citation per document per year was 5.85. The leading article, published in The Lancet journal, studied the effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health and received 1809 citations in five years. Keyword co-occurrence analysis generated three clusters, with the keyword ‘human’ appearing in 75.11% of all the publications. The University of London and World Health Organization were the leading institutions, while the United Kingdom, the United States, and Switzerland were the most productive countries.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study provides policymakers working on SDG health with valuable insights into research gaps within the indicators and funding challenges facing developing countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72803,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in health","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653323000369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Since the initiation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by the United Nations in 2015, researchers worldwide have investigated various aspects of it. One of the key areas of interest is the third SDG, which focuses on health, with its series of indicators.

Objective

This study aims to analyze the contributions of academia by using bibliographic mapping to examine scholarly publications on SDG health from 2015 to 2021.

Methods

We analyzed bibliographic data from The Lens database between 2015 and 2021 using Bibliometrix page and VOSviewer. Our analysis focused on scholarly productivity, bibliometric analysis, and geographic distribution of the outputs.

Results

We retrieved a total of 450 documents from The Lens database, with articles being the most dominant document typology at 99.8%. The mean age of the documents was 3.85 years, with a total of 18,440 citations. The mean citation per document was 40.98, and the mean citation per document per year was 5.85. The leading article, published in The Lancet journal, studied the effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health and received 1809 citations in five years. Keyword co-occurrence analysis generated three clusters, with the keyword ‘human’ appearing in 75.11% of all the publications. The University of London and World Health Organization were the leading institutions, while the United Kingdom, the United States, and Switzerland were the most productive countries.

Conclusion

This study provides policymakers working on SDG health with valuable insights into research gaps within the indicators and funding challenges facing developing countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“通往2030年的漫漫长路”:对联合国可持续发展目标3研究趋势的文献计量学和系统回顾
自2015年联合国提出可持续发展目标(SDGs)以来,世界各地的研究人员对其进行了多方面的研究。我们感兴趣的关键领域之一是第三项可持续发展目标,其重点是卫生,并提出了一系列指标。目的利用文献制图法对2015 - 2021年可持续发展目标卫生相关学术出版物进行研究,分析学术界的贡献。方法利用Bibliometrix page和VOSviewer对The Lens数据库2015 - 2021年的书目数据进行分析。我们的分析集中在学术生产力、文献计量分析和产出的地理分布上。结果从The Lens数据库中共检索到450篇文档,文章是最主要的文档类型,占99.8%。文献平均年龄为3.85岁,共被引用18440次。平均被引次数为40.98次,年平均被引次数为5.85次。发表在《柳叶刀》(The Lancet)杂志上的主要文章研究了童年时期多次不良经历对健康的影响,在五年内被引用了1809次。关键词共现分析产生了三个聚类,关键词“human”出现在所有出版物中的75.11%。伦敦大学和世界卫生组织是主要机构,而联合王国、美国和瑞士是生产力最高的国家。本研究为致力于可持续发展目标卫生的政策制定者提供了有关指标研究差距和发展中国家面临的资金挑战的宝贵见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dialogues in health
Dialogues in health Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Correlation between fall experience and life functions among community-dwelling older adults in Japan Breaking barriers: A gender-based quota system in nursing school admission in Bangladesh Success rates and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among treatment-naïve patients in Davao City, Philippines: A ten-year retrospective cohort study An overlooked risk for skin health: Less availability and higher cost of sunscreen for people with melanated skin Genomic analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 variants circulated in the Philippines, 2020–2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1