Trust and Strength of Family Ties: New Experimental Evidence

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Social Psychology Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.1177/01902725231162074
J. Ermisch, Diego Gambetta, S. L. Iacono, Burak Sonmez
{"title":"Trust and Strength of Family Ties: New Experimental Evidence","authors":"J. Ermisch, Diego Gambetta, S. L. Iacono, Burak Sonmez","doi":"10.1177/01902725231162074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We provide a conceptual replication of an experimental study that uncovered a robust correlation between the strength of individuals’ family ties and their distrust of strangers, striving to establish whether the link is causal. Using a different subjects pool and an online setting, we repeat the binary trust-game experiment from Ermisch and Gambetta and enrich it by manipulating the payoffs to create a low-trust and high-trust environment. The key finding is corroborated, but as expected, only in the high-trust environment. The two environments further allow us to impose a diff-and-diff design on the data, which rules out selection of low-trusting individuals into strong-tied families and gives us indirect evidence of causation, namely, that having strong family ties stunts the development of trust in strangers. Our findings support the emancipatory theory of trust proposed by Toshio Yamagishi and could be interpreted as uncovering the micro foundations of classic ethnographic studies, such as that by Edward Banfield, which described how subcultures fostering tight bonds within families or small groups make cooperation harder to be achieved.","PeriodicalId":48201,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology Quarterly","volume":"86 1","pages":"195 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725231162074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We provide a conceptual replication of an experimental study that uncovered a robust correlation between the strength of individuals’ family ties and their distrust of strangers, striving to establish whether the link is causal. Using a different subjects pool and an online setting, we repeat the binary trust-game experiment from Ermisch and Gambetta and enrich it by manipulating the payoffs to create a low-trust and high-trust environment. The key finding is corroborated, but as expected, only in the high-trust environment. The two environments further allow us to impose a diff-and-diff design on the data, which rules out selection of low-trusting individuals into strong-tied families and gives us indirect evidence of causation, namely, that having strong family ties stunts the development of trust in strangers. Our findings support the emancipatory theory of trust proposed by Toshio Yamagishi and could be interpreted as uncovering the micro foundations of classic ethnographic studies, such as that by Edward Banfield, which described how subcultures fostering tight bonds within families or small groups make cooperation harder to be achieved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信任与家庭关系的强度:新的实验证据
我们提供了一项实验研究的概念复制,该研究揭示了个人家庭关系的强度与他们对陌生人的不信任之间的强大相关性,并努力确定这种联系是否是因果关系。使用不同的受试者库和在线设置,我们重复了Ermisch和Gambetta的二元信任游戏实验,并通过操纵收益来丰富它,以创造一个低信任和高信任的环境。关键发现得到了证实,但正如预期的那样,只有在高度信任的环境中。这两种环境进一步使我们能够对数据进行差异化设计,从而排除了将低信任度的个人选择到紧密联系的家庭中的可能性,并为我们提供了因果关系的间接证据,即拥有紧密的家庭联系会阻碍对陌生人的信任发展。我们的研究结果支持了山城敏夫提出的信任解放理论,可以被解释为揭示了经典人种学研究的微观基础,比如爱德华·班菲尔德的研究,该研究描述了在家庭或小团体中培养紧密联系的亚文化如何使合作更难实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Psychology Quarterly
Social Psychology Quarterly PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: SPPS is a unique short reports journal in social and personality psychology. Its aim is to publish cutting-edge, short reports of single studies, or very succinct reports of multiple studies, and will be geared toward a speedy review and publication process to allow groundbreaking research to be quickly available to the field. Preferences will be given to articles that •have theoretical and practical significance •represent an advance to social psychological or personality science •will be of broad interest both within and outside of social and personality psychology •are written to be intelligible to a wide range of readers including science writers for the popular press
期刊最新文献
Scrutinizing Justice in Sociology: Inspiration From Social Psychology Introduction of Karen A. Hegtvedt, Winner of the 2023 Cooley-Mead Award The Job Satisfaction Paradox: Pluralistic Ignorance and the Myth of the “Unhappy Worker” When Good News Falls Flat: Complications in the Delivery and Reception of Good News in Pediatric Neurology The Magic Word? Face-Work and the Functions of Please in Everyday Requests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1