The effects of exercise on function and pain following total hip arthroplasty: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

IF 0.8 Q4 REHABILITATION Physical Therapy Reviews Pub Date : 2022-04-20 DOI:10.1080/10833196.2022.2062967
Wilson Tang, C. Flavell, A. Grant, K. Doma
{"title":"The effects of exercise on function and pain following total hip arthroplasty: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis","authors":"Wilson Tang, C. Flavell, A. Grant, K. Doma","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2022.2062967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Previous reviews have reported the efficacy of exercise interventions following total hip arthroplasty (THA), but poor inter-study comparability of low-quality studies, and outcome measure heterogeneity predominate. Conclusions regarding exercise intervention efficacy following THA are lacking. Objectives Conduct a systematic literature review with meta-analysis to report the effects of exercise following THA, using self-reported outcome measures of function and pain, and clinical tests for gait capacity. Methods An electronic database search of CINAHL, Informit, Medline, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Scopus, and SportDiscus was conducted. Included studies (1) reported exercise interventions in adult populations following THA; (2) reported outcomes either of physical function, pain intensity, or clinical gait capacity; (3) were randomised controlled trials published in English. Study appraisal was conducted using PEDro scale. A meta-analysis was conducted to report intervention effect size and statistical significance between experimental and control groups. Results Searches yielded 5,997 studies. Twenty-four studies underwent systematic review. Twelve were eligible for meta-analysis. Study quality ranged from fair to excellent (median = 7, range = 5–9/10). Exercise interventions included hydrotherapy, and progressive resistance, gait, task-based, upper-limb, and sports therapy training. Significant between-group differences in self-reported function, pain, and gait velocity were observed at short-term follow-up, favouring exercise intervention groups. At long-term follow-up, these improvements were not significant. Conclusions This review identified that exercise interventions significantly improved self-reported physical function, pain intensity and gait velocity following THA in the short term. Further research is required to clarify long-term exercise effects, and the most effective exercise intervention, in studies which detail the interventions explicitly.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2022.2062967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background Previous reviews have reported the efficacy of exercise interventions following total hip arthroplasty (THA), but poor inter-study comparability of low-quality studies, and outcome measure heterogeneity predominate. Conclusions regarding exercise intervention efficacy following THA are lacking. Objectives Conduct a systematic literature review with meta-analysis to report the effects of exercise following THA, using self-reported outcome measures of function and pain, and clinical tests for gait capacity. Methods An electronic database search of CINAHL, Informit, Medline, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Scopus, and SportDiscus was conducted. Included studies (1) reported exercise interventions in adult populations following THA; (2) reported outcomes either of physical function, pain intensity, or clinical gait capacity; (3) were randomised controlled trials published in English. Study appraisal was conducted using PEDro scale. A meta-analysis was conducted to report intervention effect size and statistical significance between experimental and control groups. Results Searches yielded 5,997 studies. Twenty-four studies underwent systematic review. Twelve were eligible for meta-analysis. Study quality ranged from fair to excellent (median = 7, range = 5–9/10). Exercise interventions included hydrotherapy, and progressive resistance, gait, task-based, upper-limb, and sports therapy training. Significant between-group differences in self-reported function, pain, and gait velocity were observed at short-term follow-up, favouring exercise intervention groups. At long-term follow-up, these improvements were not significant. Conclusions This review identified that exercise interventions significantly improved self-reported physical function, pain intensity and gait velocity following THA in the short term. Further research is required to clarify long-term exercise effects, and the most effective exercise intervention, in studies which detail the interventions explicitly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动对全髋关节置换术后功能和疼痛的影响:系统文献综述和荟萃分析
背景先前的综述报道了全髋关节置换术(THA)后运动干预的疗效,但低质量研究的研究间可比性差,结果测量的异质性占主导地位。关于THA术后运动干预效果的结论尚缺乏。目的:采用自我报告的功能和疼痛结果测量以及步态能力的临床测试,进行系统的文献综述和荟萃分析,报告THA后运动的影响。方法采用CINAHL、Informit、Medline、Physiotherapy Evidence database、Scopus、SportDiscus等电子数据库进行检索。纳入的研究(1)报道了THA后成人人群的运动干预;(2)报告的身体功能、疼痛强度或临床步态能力的结果;(3)以英文发表的随机对照试验。采用PEDro量表进行研究评价。进行meta分析,报告实验组和对照组之间的干预效应大小和统计学显著性。结果搜索得到5997项研究。对24项研究进行了系统评价。其中12例符合meta分析的条件。研究质量从一般到极好(中位数= 7,范围= 5-9/10)。运动干预包括水疗法、进行性阻力、步态、任务型、上肢和运动治疗训练。在短期随访中观察到自我报告的功能、疼痛和步态速度在组间有显著差异,这有利于运动干预组。在长期随访中,这些改善并不显著。结论:本综述发现,运动干预在短期内显著改善THA术后自我报告的身体功能、疼痛强度和步态速度。需要进一步的研究来澄清长期运动的影响,以及最有效的运动干预,在研究中明确地详细说明了干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy Reviews
Physical Therapy Reviews REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy Reviews is an international journal which aims to publish contemporary reviews, discussion papers and editorials within physical therapy, and in those basic and clinical sciences which are the basis of physical therapy. The journal is aimed at all those involved in research, teaching and practice within the area of physical therapy. Reviews (both descriptive and systematic) are invited in the following areas, which reflect the breadth and diversity of practice within physical therapy: •neurological rehabilitation •movement and exercise •orthopaedics and rheumatology •manual therapy and massage •sports medicine •measurement •chest physiotherapy •electrotherapeutics •obstetrics and gynaecology •complementary therapies •professional issues •musculoskeletal rehabilitation
期刊最新文献
The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of tests used to assess the effects of power training in older adults: a systematic review Physical therapy treatment interventions and the effects thereof on clinical outcomes when addressing intra-pleural abnormalities in patients with trauma: protocol for a systematic review Motivational modulation enhances movement performance in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review What influences patient decision making after anterior cruciate ligament injury in Australia; an internet survey What is the contribution of latissimus dorsi to trunk movement and control? A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1