On the record with Judge Jody Kollapen

IF 0.2 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ Pub Date : 2019-04-18 DOI:10.17159/2413-3108/2018/V0N66A6242
Nontsasa Nako
{"title":"On the record with Judge Jody Kollapen","authors":"Nontsasa Nako","doi":"10.17159/2413-3108/2018/V0N66A6242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the revelations by Bosasa officials at the State Capture Enquiry, held in early 2019, laying bare the corrupt links between prisons, detention centres and border control, and high ranking political and government officials, the time is ripe to excavate the capitalist interests that fuel incarceration in this country. How did the prison industrial complex overtake the lofty principles that ushered in the South African democratic era? Judge Jody Kollapen is well-placed to speak to about the evolution of the South African prison from a colonial institute that served to criminalise and dominate 'natives', to its utility as instrument of state repression under apartheid, to its present manifestation in the democratic era. He has laboured at the coalface of apartheid crime and punishment through his work as an attorney in the Delmas Treason Trial, and  for the Sharpeville Six, and also worked as a member of Lawyers for Human Rights, where he coordinated the 'Release Political Prisoners' programme, Importantly, Justice Kollapen had a ringside seat at the theatre of our transition from apartheid to democracy as he was part of the selection panel that chose the commissioners for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). Many questions can be asked of the South African TRC including whether it was the best mechanism to deal with the past and whether it achieved reconciliation. What concerns us here is its impact on crime and punishment in the democratic era. If our transition was premised on restorative justice, then shouldn’t that be the guiding principle for the emerging democratic state?  In line with this special edition’s focus on the impact of incarceration on the marginalized and vulnerable, Judge Kollapen shares some insights on how the prison has fared in democratic South Africa, and how imprisonment affects communities across the country. As an Acting Judge in the Constitutional Court, a practitioner with a long history of civic engagement, and someone who has thought and written about criminalization, human rights and prisons, Judge Kollapen helps us to think about what decolonization entails for prisons in South Africa.","PeriodicalId":54100,"journal":{"name":"South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2018/V0N66A6242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the revelations by Bosasa officials at the State Capture Enquiry, held in early 2019, laying bare the corrupt links between prisons, detention centres and border control, and high ranking political and government officials, the time is ripe to excavate the capitalist interests that fuel incarceration in this country. How did the prison industrial complex overtake the lofty principles that ushered in the South African democratic era? Judge Jody Kollapen is well-placed to speak to about the evolution of the South African prison from a colonial institute that served to criminalise and dominate 'natives', to its utility as instrument of state repression under apartheid, to its present manifestation in the democratic era. He has laboured at the coalface of apartheid crime and punishment through his work as an attorney in the Delmas Treason Trial, and  for the Sharpeville Six, and also worked as a member of Lawyers for Human Rights, where he coordinated the 'Release Political Prisoners' programme, Importantly, Justice Kollapen had a ringside seat at the theatre of our transition from apartheid to democracy as he was part of the selection panel that chose the commissioners for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). Many questions can be asked of the South African TRC including whether it was the best mechanism to deal with the past and whether it achieved reconciliation. What concerns us here is its impact on crime and punishment in the democratic era. If our transition was premised on restorative justice, then shouldn’t that be the guiding principle for the emerging democratic state?  In line with this special edition’s focus on the impact of incarceration on the marginalized and vulnerable, Judge Kollapen shares some insights on how the prison has fared in democratic South Africa, and how imprisonment affects communities across the country. As an Acting Judge in the Constitutional Court, a practitioner with a long history of civic engagement, and someone who has thought and written about criminalization, human rights and prisons, Judge Kollapen helps us to think about what decolonization entails for prisons in South Africa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与Jody Kollapen法官记录在案
随着博萨萨官员在2019年初举行的国家抓捕调查中揭露监狱、拘留中心和边境管制以及高级政治和政府官员之间的腐败联系,挖掘助长该国监禁的资本主义利益的时机已经成熟。监狱工业综合体是如何超越开创南非民主时代的崇高原则的?Jody Kollapen法官非常适合谈论南非监狱的演变,从一个曾将“原住民”定罪和统治的殖民机构,到它在种族隔离下作为国家镇压工具的效用,再到它在民主时代的当前表现。他曾在德尔马斯叛国案审判和沙佩维尔六人组担任律师,在种族隔离犯罪和惩罚的困境中工作,还曾担任人权律师协会的成员,在那里他协调了“释放政治犯”计划,Kollapen法官在我们从种族隔离向民主过渡的舞台上坐在场边,因为他是选择真相与和解委员会(TRC)委员的选拔小组的一员。可以向南非真相与和解委员会提出许多问题,包括它是否是处理过去的最佳机制,以及它是否实现了和解。我们在这里关注的是它对民主时代犯罪和惩罚的影响。如果我们的过渡是以恢复性司法为前提的,那么这难道不应该成为新兴民主国家的指导原则吗?根据本期特别版对监禁对边缘化和弱势群体影响的关注,Kollapen法官分享了一些关于监狱在民主南非的表现以及监禁如何影响全国社区的见解。作为宪法法院的代理法官,一位有着悠久公民参与历史的从业者,一位对刑事定罪、人权和监狱进行过思考和写作的人,科拉彭法官帮助我们思考南非监狱的非殖民化意味着什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ
South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Progressive or regressive rape case law? Tshabalala v S; Ntuli v S 2020 2 SACR 38 CC Combatting violence against African foreign nationals: A criminological approach towards community safety in the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa Keeping them out of prison: A restorative justice education intervention with prison inmates in Lesotho ‘Bad, sad and angry’: Responses of the SAPS leadership to the dangers of policing Understanding crime using GIS and the context of COVID-19: the case of Saldanha Bay Municipality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1