Fossil mosses: What do they tell us about moss evolution?

M. Ignatov, E. Maslova
{"title":"Fossil mosses: What do they tell us about moss evolution?","authors":"M. Ignatov, E. Maslova","doi":"10.11646/bde.43.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The moss fossil records from the Paleozoic age to the Eocene epoch are reviewed and their putative relationships to extant moss groups discussed. The incomplete preservation and lack of key characters that could define the position of an ancient moss in modern classification remain the problem. Carboniferous records are still impossible to refer to any of the modern moss taxa. Numerous Permian protosphagnalean mosses possess traits that are absent in any extant group and they are therefore treated here as an extinct lineage, whose descendants, if any remain, cannot be recognized among contemporary taxa. Non-protosphagnalean Permian mosses were also fairly diverse, representing morphotypes comparable with Dicranidae and acrocarpous Bryidae, although unequivocal representatives of these subclasses are known only since Cretaceous and Jurassic. Even though Sphagnales is one of two oldest lineages separated from the main trunk of moss phylogenetic tree, it appears in fossil state regularly only since Late Cretaceous, ca. 70 million years ago (Ma), while earlier they were found twice as small leaf fragments from Lower Jurassic (ca. 200 Ma) and Late Ordovician (ca. 455 Ma). Pleurocarpous mosses appear in fossil state near the border between Jurassic and Cretaceous, although most Cretaceous mosses belong to acrocarps. Only in Eocene amber pleurocarps become more numerous than acrocarps. Some Eocene mosses can be assigned to extant families and sometimes genera, although the majority of Eocene pleurocarps are difficult to identify up to the family, as their morphology often allows placement of a particular specimen into several different families.","PeriodicalId":93270,"journal":{"name":"Bryophyte diversity and evolution","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bryophyte diversity and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.43.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The moss fossil records from the Paleozoic age to the Eocene epoch are reviewed and their putative relationships to extant moss groups discussed. The incomplete preservation and lack of key characters that could define the position of an ancient moss in modern classification remain the problem. Carboniferous records are still impossible to refer to any of the modern moss taxa. Numerous Permian protosphagnalean mosses possess traits that are absent in any extant group and they are therefore treated here as an extinct lineage, whose descendants, if any remain, cannot be recognized among contemporary taxa. Non-protosphagnalean Permian mosses were also fairly diverse, representing morphotypes comparable with Dicranidae and acrocarpous Bryidae, although unequivocal representatives of these subclasses are known only since Cretaceous and Jurassic. Even though Sphagnales is one of two oldest lineages separated from the main trunk of moss phylogenetic tree, it appears in fossil state regularly only since Late Cretaceous, ca. 70 million years ago (Ma), while earlier they were found twice as small leaf fragments from Lower Jurassic (ca. 200 Ma) and Late Ordovician (ca. 455 Ma). Pleurocarpous mosses appear in fossil state near the border between Jurassic and Cretaceous, although most Cretaceous mosses belong to acrocarps. Only in Eocene amber pleurocarps become more numerous than acrocarps. Some Eocene mosses can be assigned to extant families and sometimes genera, although the majority of Eocene pleurocarps are difficult to identify up to the family, as their morphology often allows placement of a particular specimen into several different families.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苔藓化石:它们告诉我们关于苔藓进化的什么?
综述了从古生代到始新世的苔藓化石记录,并讨论了它们与现存苔藓类群的假定关系。不完整的保存和缺乏能够确定古代苔藓在现代分类中的位置的关键特征仍然是一个问题。石炭纪的记录仍然不可能提及任何现代苔藓分类群。许多二叠纪的原泥炭藓类苔藓具有任何现存类群都没有的特征,因此它们在这里被视为一个已灭绝的谱系,其后代(如果有的话)在当代分类群中无法识别。非原泥炭藓类二叠纪苔藓也相当多样化,其形态类型可与Dicranidae和Acrocarpus Bryidae相媲美,尽管这些亚类的明确代表性仅在白垩纪和侏罗纪才为人所知。尽管狮身人面像是从苔藓系统发育树主干中分离出来的两个最古老的谱系之一,但它只有在白垩纪晚期(约7000万年前(Ma))才定期以化石状态出现,而更早的时候,它们被发现的小叶片是下侏罗纪(约200 Ma)和晚奥陶世(约455 Ma)的两倍。虽然白垩纪的大部分苔藓属于肩果类,但在侏罗纪和白垩纪边界附近,胸果类苔藓以化石状态出现。只有在始新世,琥珀胸果的数量才比肩果多。一些始新世苔藓可以分为现存的科,有时也可以分为属,尽管大多数始新世胸膜苔藓很难识别到科,因为它们的形态通常允许将特定的标本分为几个不同的科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The water absorption capacity of 21 Sphagnum species Special issue for Stephan Robbert Gradstein, commemorating his 80th birthday (Cover) Fissidens bassilae (Fissidentaceae, Musci), a new species from Africa Special issue for Stephan Robbert Gradstein, commemorating his 80th birthday (Table of Contents) In Celebration of Professor Stephan Robbert Gradstein
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1