Resisting the rhetoric of indexing: disability, access, and the 2005 Tennessee State Capitol sit-in

IF 1.1 1区 文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION Communication and Critical-Cultural Studies Pub Date : 2022-06-21 DOI:10.1080/14791420.2022.2086280
J. Bennett
{"title":"Resisting the rhetoric of indexing: disability, access, and the 2005 Tennessee State Capitol sit-in","authors":"J. Bennett","doi":"10.1080/14791420.2022.2086280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Healthcare has traditionally been structured by biopolitical processes of indexing. The rhetorical practice of indexing stratifies bodies into risk categories and determines who has access to services and at what cost. Indexing generalizes features of identity, artificially classifying them into risk categories to maximize corporate profits. This dubious process accounts for traditional matters of health such as disease and illness, but also assesses broad demographic markers such as gender, race, and disability. This essay engages an attempt by disability activists to resist such practices through a 2005 sit-in at the Tennessee State Capitol.","PeriodicalId":46339,"journal":{"name":"Communication and Critical-Cultural Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"235 - 253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication and Critical-Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2022.2086280","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Healthcare has traditionally been structured by biopolitical processes of indexing. The rhetorical practice of indexing stratifies bodies into risk categories and determines who has access to services and at what cost. Indexing generalizes features of identity, artificially classifying them into risk categories to maximize corporate profits. This dubious process accounts for traditional matters of health such as disease and illness, but also assesses broad demographic markers such as gender, race, and disability. This essay engages an attempt by disability activists to resist such practices through a 2005 sit-in at the Tennessee State Capitol.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抵制索引的花言巧语:残疾、访问和2005年田纳西州议会大厦静坐
传统上,医疗保健是通过索引的生物政治过程来构建的。索引的修辞实践将机构按风险类别分层,并确定谁可以获得服务以及以什么成本获得服务。索引概括了身份的特征,人为地将其划分为风险类别,以最大化企业利润。这一可疑的过程既解释了疾病等传统的健康问题,也评估了性别、种族和残疾等广泛的人口统计学标志。2005年,残疾人活动人士在田纳西州议会大厦静坐抗议这种做法,本文讲述了他们的尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies (CC/CS) is a peer-reviewed publication of the National Communication Association. CC/CS publishes original scholarship that situates culture as a site of struggle and communication as an enactment and discipline of power. The journal features critical inquiry that cuts across academic and theoretical boundaries. CC/CS welcomes a variety of methods including textual, discourse, and rhetorical analyses alongside auto/ethnographic, narrative, and poetic inquiry.
期刊最新文献
Thick rhetoric: MLK and global cartographies of polyvocal struggle Taking a stand from the periphery: negotiating and resisting the white gaze in public images of Black women’s civic protest Mandating work, commanding health, and managing risk: the (bio)politics of Medicaid reform [Black] plastic feelings; feeling [Black] The common wind from below: unruly metaphors, radical rhetorics, and pluriversal worlds within/across/beyond the Haitian and Zapatista Revolutions (part 2/2)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1