Feeling More Black in Portland: Diversity and the Enregisterment of Livability

Kim Cameron-Domínguez
{"title":"Feeling More Black in Portland: Diversity and the Enregisterment of Livability","authors":"Kim Cameron-Domínguez","doi":"10.1002/fea2.12112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the relationship between diversity and urban livability in Portland, Oregon, as ideological and pragmatic projects. I argue that diversity enregisters the city as livable, because the progressive ideals that diversity puts forth index one of many innovative approaches that Portland has taken to resolve the challenges of urban life. Black professional women are both rhetors and subjects of this enregisterment process. They are routinely called on to make public arguments about diversity. However, I show that diversity work just as routinely creates situations where the communicable power of whiteness in the city is both evident and maintained. Women describe navigating this dynamic as “feeling more Black in Portland” than anywhere else they have lived. I contend that this feeling of racialized affect is engendered by diversity's subordination to livability—a structural relation that indexes both the neoliberal underpinnings of local belonging and how narrowly the space is constructed to include Blackness and womanhood.</p>","PeriodicalId":73022,"journal":{"name":"Feminist anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fea2.12112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between diversity and urban livability in Portland, Oregon, as ideological and pragmatic projects. I argue that diversity enregisters the city as livable, because the progressive ideals that diversity puts forth index one of many innovative approaches that Portland has taken to resolve the challenges of urban life. Black professional women are both rhetors and subjects of this enregisterment process. They are routinely called on to make public arguments about diversity. However, I show that diversity work just as routinely creates situations where the communicable power of whiteness in the city is both evident and maintained. Women describe navigating this dynamic as “feeling more Black in Portland” than anywhere else they have lived. I contend that this feeling of racialized affect is engendered by diversity's subordination to livability—a structural relation that indexes both the neoliberal underpinnings of local belonging and how narrowly the space is constructed to include Blackness and womanhood.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波特兰感觉更黑:多样性与宜居性的登记
本文考察了俄勒冈州波特兰市的多样性和城市宜居性之间的关系,作为意识形态和务实的项目。我认为多样性是这座城市宜居的标志,因为多样性所带来的进步理想是波特兰解决城市生活挑战的众多创新方法之一。黑人职业女性既是修辞学家,也是这个注册过程的对象。他们经常被要求就多样性问题进行公开辩论。然而,我表明,多样性的工作就像常规地创造了这样的情况,即白人在城市中的传播力量既明显又持续。女性们形容,在这种动态中,比起她们生活过的其他任何地方,她们“感觉波特兰更像黑人”。我认为,这种种族化影响的感觉是由多样性从属于宜居性而产生的——这是一种结构性关系,它既索引了新自由主义的地方归属感基础,也索引了包括黑人和女性在内的狭窄空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Finding Wang Tonghui: The life and after‐life of a pioneer female Chinese anthropologist Gender violence, emotion, and the state symposium commentary The politics of emotion and domestic violence in northern Vietnam Introduction to the gender violence, emotion, and the state symposium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1