ANALYSIS OF WING SEPARATION AND MID-AIR BREAKUP IN LIGHT TRAINING AIRCRAFT

IF 0.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE Aviation Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI:10.3846/aviation.2021.15953
M. Hirabayashi
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF WING SEPARATION AND MID-AIR BREAKUP IN LIGHT TRAINING AIRCRAFT","authors":"M. Hirabayashi","doi":"10.3846/aviation.2021.15953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite increasing discussions concerning the recently published wing spar airworthiness directive (AD) that affects many training aircraft and several current ADs for wing struts, there remains limited objective literature on incidents of wing separation or mid-air breakup. This paper attempts to report and analyse instances of wing separation and mid-air breakup of light training aircraft. A careful review of the United States National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) aircraft accident database revealed that wing separations were more likely occur as mid-air breakup in PA28s than 172s/182s (OR: 3.06, 95 % CI: 1.3682 to 6.8536, p = .008). Additionally, wing separations were less likely to occur as mid-air breakups in the strutted 172s/182s than 177s/210s that don’t have a wing strut (OR: 0.11, 95 % CI: 0.04 to 0.29, p = <.001). This implies that non-strutted wing designs may be more susceptability to mid-air breakup than the strutted design of similar aircraft.","PeriodicalId":51910,"journal":{"name":"Aviation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aviation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2021.15953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite increasing discussions concerning the recently published wing spar airworthiness directive (AD) that affects many training aircraft and several current ADs for wing struts, there remains limited objective literature on incidents of wing separation or mid-air breakup. This paper attempts to report and analyse instances of wing separation and mid-air breakup of light training aircraft. A careful review of the United States National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) aircraft accident database revealed that wing separations were more likely occur as mid-air breakup in PA28s than 172s/182s (OR: 3.06, 95 % CI: 1.3682 to 6.8536, p = .008). Additionally, wing separations were less likely to occur as mid-air breakups in the strutted 172s/182s than 177s/210s that don’t have a wing strut (OR: 0.11, 95 % CI: 0.04 to 0.29, p = <.001). This implies that non-strutted wing designs may be more susceptability to mid-air breakup than the strutted design of similar aircraft.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻型教练机机翼分离与空中解体分析
尽管最近发布的影响许多训练飞机的翼梁适航指令(AD)和一些当前的机翼支柱适航指令(AD)引起了越来越多的讨论,但关于机翼分离或空中破裂事件的客观文献仍然有限。本文试图报道和分析轻型教练机机翼分离和空中解体的实例。对美国国家运输安全委员会(NTSB)飞机事故数据库的仔细审查显示,pa28比172 /182更容易在空中解体时发生机翼分离(OR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.3682至6.8536,p = 0.008)。此外,与没有机翼支柱的177s/210s相比,有支柱的177s/ 182s在空中解体时发生机翼分离的可能性更小(OR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.04至0.29,p = < 0.001)。这意味着非支撑翼设计可能比类似飞机的支撑翼设计更容易受到半空破裂的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aviation
Aviation ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING FIELDS OF RESEARCH: ▪ Flight Physics ▪ Air Traffic Management ▪ Aerostructures ▪ Airports ▪ Propulsion ▪ Human Factors ▪ Aircraft Avionics, Systems and Equipment ▪ Air Transport Technologies and Development ▪ Flight Mechanics ▪ History of Aviation ▪ Integrated Design and Validation (method and tools) Besides, it publishes: short reports and notes, reviews, reports about conferences and workshops
期刊最新文献
DETERMINATION OF LOADS IN THE ULTRALIGHT HELICOPTER BLADES RATIONAL CONTROL BY TEMPERATURE IN VORTEX ENERGY SEPARATOR UNDER DESTABILIZING EFFECTS CUSTOMER-FOCUSED AIRCRAFT SEAT DESIGN: A CASE STUDY WITH AHP-QFD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND HAZARDS IN THE AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE INDUSTRY: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW IMPLEMENTATION STUDY OF A PASSIVE SAFETY FEATURE IN THE RESCUE SYSTEMS OF SMALL AIRCRAFTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1