“Voice of the People”: Sidney Roger, the Labor/Left, and Broadcasting in San Francisco, 1945–1950

Q2 Arts and Humanities American Communist History Pub Date : 2019-04-03 DOI:10.1080/14743892.2019.1599631
Nathan Godfried
{"title":"“Voice of the People”: Sidney Roger, the Labor/Left, and Broadcasting in San Francisco, 1945–1950","authors":"Nathan Godfried","doi":"10.1080/14743892.2019.1599631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In July 1950, San Francisco radio station KGO canceled Sidney Roger’s news commentary program. The station, owned and operated by the American Broadcasting Company (ABC), contended that Roger no longer represented the views of any “significant group in the community.” KGO-ABC officials believed that Roger’s broadcasts promoted Communist party (CP) and radical union ideas and thereby skewed the station’s news coverage. The Federal Bureau of Investigation already had a file on Roger for associating with area communists; and the California Senate’s Fact-Finding Committee on UnAmerican Activities officially branded Roger a “bona fide, iron disciplined Communist revolutionary.” These public and private sector attacks sought to remove Roger from the airwaves. But they also aimed, as Gerald Horne has argued in a similar context, to undermine “popular front” journalists engaged in an ideological/cultural war with corporations and political conservatives. Roger posed a particular threat because, contrary to the assertions of radio officials, he continued to speak to and reflect the values and interests of the Bay Area’s labor/Left public sphere: a community of radical trade unionists, civil rights and civil liberties advocates, and communists who soon rallied to restore Roger to the air. Historians and media scholars have discussed how H.V. Kaltenborn, Edward R. Murrow, and other prominent broadcast commentators reflected and shaped the nation’s Cold War political culture. Sponsored by large corporations, these news analysts reported on and interpreted developments at home and abroad. Yet their observations rarely scrutinized the roots of a nascent military–industrial complex, a national security state, and political repression. Nor did independently minded, liberal journalists (like William L. Shirer and Don Hollenbeck), fully dissect the internal logic of the state and corporate sectors. Commentators supported by organized labor did a better job than their businessfunded counterparts of presenting alternative perspectives on domestic issues. Elizabeth Fones-Wolf has explained how Frank Edwards and Edward Morgan of the American","PeriodicalId":35150,"journal":{"name":"American Communist History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14743892.2019.1599631","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Communist History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14743892.2019.1599631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In July 1950, San Francisco radio station KGO canceled Sidney Roger’s news commentary program. The station, owned and operated by the American Broadcasting Company (ABC), contended that Roger no longer represented the views of any “significant group in the community.” KGO-ABC officials believed that Roger’s broadcasts promoted Communist party (CP) and radical union ideas and thereby skewed the station’s news coverage. The Federal Bureau of Investigation already had a file on Roger for associating with area communists; and the California Senate’s Fact-Finding Committee on UnAmerican Activities officially branded Roger a “bona fide, iron disciplined Communist revolutionary.” These public and private sector attacks sought to remove Roger from the airwaves. But they also aimed, as Gerald Horne has argued in a similar context, to undermine “popular front” journalists engaged in an ideological/cultural war with corporations and political conservatives. Roger posed a particular threat because, contrary to the assertions of radio officials, he continued to speak to and reflect the values and interests of the Bay Area’s labor/Left public sphere: a community of radical trade unionists, civil rights and civil liberties advocates, and communists who soon rallied to restore Roger to the air. Historians and media scholars have discussed how H.V. Kaltenborn, Edward R. Murrow, and other prominent broadcast commentators reflected and shaped the nation’s Cold War political culture. Sponsored by large corporations, these news analysts reported on and interpreted developments at home and abroad. Yet their observations rarely scrutinized the roots of a nascent military–industrial complex, a national security state, and political repression. Nor did independently minded, liberal journalists (like William L. Shirer and Don Hollenbeck), fully dissect the internal logic of the state and corporate sectors. Commentators supported by organized labor did a better job than their businessfunded counterparts of presenting alternative perspectives on domestic issues. Elizabeth Fones-Wolf has explained how Frank Edwards and Edward Morgan of the American
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“人民的声音”:西德尼·罗杰、劳工/左派和旧金山广播,1945-1950
1950年7月,旧金山KGO电台取消了西德尼·罗杰的新闻评论节目。该电视台由美国广播公司(ABC)所有和运营,声称罗杰不再代表“社区中任何重要群体”的观点。KGO-ABC官员认为,罗杰的广播宣传了共产党和激进的工会思想,从而扭曲了该电视台的新闻报道。联邦调查局已经有罗杰与地区共产主义者有关联的档案;加州参议院非美国活动实况调查委员会(Fact Finding Committee on UnAmerican Activities)正式将罗杰称为“真正的、纪律严明的共产主义革命者”。这些公共和私营部门的攻击旨在将罗杰从广播中删除。但正如杰拉尔德·霍恩(Gerald Horne)在类似背景下所说,他们的目的也是破坏与企业和政治保守派进行意识形态/文化战争的“大众前线”记者。罗杰构成了一个特别的威胁,因为与电台官员的说法相反,他继续与湾区劳工/左翼公共领域的价值观和利益对话,并反映这些领域:一个由激进工会主义者、民权和公民自由倡导者以及共产主义者组成的社区,他们很快就团结起来,让罗杰重返舞台。历史学家和媒体学者讨论了H.V.Kaltenborn、Edward R.Murrow和其他著名广播评论员如何反映和塑造国家的冷战政治文化。在大公司的赞助下,这些新闻分析师报道并解读了国内外的事态发展。然而,他们的观察很少仔细审视新生的军工复合体、国家安全国家和政治镇压的根源。独立思想的自由派记者(如威廉·L·希勒和唐·霍伦贝克)也没有充分剖析国家和企业部门的内部逻辑。在对国内问题提出不同观点方面,有组织劳工支持的评论员比商业资助的评论员做得更好。Elizabeth Fones Wolf解释了美国的Frank Edwards和Edward Morgan
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Communist History
American Communist History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Arise! Global Radicalism in the Era of the Mexican Revolution Arise! Global Radicalism in the Era of the Mexican Revolution , by Christina Heatherton, Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2022, 336 pp., $29.95, ISBN 978-0-5202-8787-7. “Down the Left Hand Path to Perdition”: Equity, the Actors Forum, and Anti-Communism The Palgrave Handbook of Communist Women Activists Around the World The Palgrave Handbook of Communist Women Activists Around the World , by Palgrave Macmillan, 2023, ISBN 978-3-031-13126-4. Communist Women’s Activism around the World, Part 1: Global Foremothers (Review) The Palgrave Handbook of Communist Women Activists Around the World , by Palgrave Macmillan, 2023, ISBN 978-3-031-13126-4. The Trials of Paul Novick: Israel, Zionism, and the CPUSA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1