Which Message? Which Channel? Which Customer? - Exploring Response Rates in Multi-Channel Marketing Using Short-Form Advertising

Omar Marzouk, Joni O. Salminen, Pengyi Zhang, B. Jansen
{"title":"Which Message? Which Channel? Which Customer? - Exploring Response Rates in Multi-Channel Marketing Using Short-Form Advertising","authors":"Omar Marzouk, Joni O. Salminen, Pengyi Zhang, B. Jansen","doi":"10.2478/dim-2021-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Formulating short-form advertising messages with little ad content that work and choosing high-performing channels to disseminate them are persistent challenges in multichannel marketing. Drawing on the persuasive systems design (PSD) model, we experimented with 33,848 actual customers of an international telecom company. In a real-life setting, we compared the effectiveness of three persuasion strategies (rational, emotional, and social) tested in three marketing channels (short message service (SMS), social media advertising, and mobile application), evaluating their effect on influencing customers to purchase international mobile phone credits. Results suggest that companies should send rational messages when using short-form advertising messages regardless of the channel to achieve higher response rates. Findings further show that certain customer characteristics are predictive of positive responses and differ by channel but not by message type. Findings from crowdsourced evaluations also indicate that people noticeably disagree on what persuasive strategy was applied to these short messages, indicating that consumers are not well-equipped to identify persuasive strategies or that what advertisers see as a “pure” strategy actually involves elements from multiple strategies as interpreted by consumers. The results have implications for the theoretical understanding of persuasive short-form commercial messaging in multichannel marketing and practical insights for advertising within a limited amount of space and attention afforded by many digital channels.","PeriodicalId":72769,"journal":{"name":"Data and information management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data and information management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2021-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Abstract Formulating short-form advertising messages with little ad content that work and choosing high-performing channels to disseminate them are persistent challenges in multichannel marketing. Drawing on the persuasive systems design (PSD) model, we experimented with 33,848 actual customers of an international telecom company. In a real-life setting, we compared the effectiveness of three persuasion strategies (rational, emotional, and social) tested in three marketing channels (short message service (SMS), social media advertising, and mobile application), evaluating their effect on influencing customers to purchase international mobile phone credits. Results suggest that companies should send rational messages when using short-form advertising messages regardless of the channel to achieve higher response rates. Findings further show that certain customer characteristics are predictive of positive responses and differ by channel but not by message type. Findings from crowdsourced evaluations also indicate that people noticeably disagree on what persuasive strategy was applied to these short messages, indicating that consumers are not well-equipped to identify persuasive strategies or that what advertisers see as a “pure” strategy actually involves elements from multiple strategies as interpreted by consumers. The results have implications for the theoretical understanding of persuasive short-form commercial messaging in multichannel marketing and practical insights for advertising within a limited amount of space and attention afforded by many digital channels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪条消息?哪个频道?哪个客户?-利用简短广告探索多渠道营销的响应率
摘要在多渠道营销中,用少量有效的广告内容来制定简短的广告信息,并选择高性能的渠道来传播这些信息,是一个持续的挑战。利用说服系统设计(PSD)模型,我们对一家国际电信公司的33848名实际客户进行了实验。在现实生活中,我们比较了在三种营销渠道(短信服务、社交媒体广告和移动应用程序)中测试的三种说服策略(理性、情感和社交)的有效性,评估了它们对影响客户购买国际手机信用的影响。研究结果表明,公司在使用短格式广告信息时,无论渠道如何,都应该发送合理的信息,以获得更高的响应率。调查结果进一步表明,某些客户特征可以预测积极的反应,并因渠道而不同,但不因信息类型而不同。众包评估的结果还表明,人们对将什么样的说服策略应用于这些短信存在明显的分歧,这表明消费者没有做好识别说服策略的准备,或者广告商所认为的“纯粹”策略实际上涉及消费者所解释的多个策略的元素。研究结果对多渠道营销中有说服力的短格式商业信息的理论理解以及在许多数字渠道提供的有限空间和关注范围内进行广告的实践见解具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Data and information management
Data and information management Management Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Erratum regarding missing Declaration of Competing Interest statements in previously published articles (Volume 6, Issues 1–4) Improved detection of transient events in wide area sky survey using convolutional neural networks An evaluation method of academic output that considers productivity differences Adaptive K-means clustering based under-sampling methods to solve the class imbalance problem Does internet use affect public risk perception? — From the perspective of political participation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1