Breaking Benford’s law: a statistical analysis of COVID-19 data using the Euclidean distance statistic

Q4 Mathematics Statistics in Transition Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI:10.59170/stattrans-2023-028
L. Campanelli
{"title":"Breaking Benford’s law: a statistical analysis of COVID-19 data using the Euclidean\n distance statistic","authors":"L. Campanelli","doi":"10.59170/stattrans-2023-028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the Euclidean distance statistical test of Benford’s law, we analyse the\n COVID-19 weekly case counts by country. While 62% of the 100 countries and territories\n considered in the present study conforms to Benford’s law at a significant level of α =\n 0.05 and 17% at a significant level of 0.01 ≤ α < 0.05, the remaining 21% shows a\n deviation from it (p values smaller than 0.01). In particular, 5% of the countries\n ‘break’ Benford’s law with a p value smaller than 0.001.","PeriodicalId":37985,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Transition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59170/stattrans-2023-028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Using the Euclidean distance statistical test of Benford’s law, we analyse the COVID-19 weekly case counts by country. While 62% of the 100 countries and territories considered in the present study conforms to Benford’s law at a significant level of α = 0.05 and 17% at a significant level of 0.01 ≤ α < 0.05, the remaining 21% shows a deviation from it (p values smaller than 0.01). In particular, 5% of the countries ‘break’ Benford’s law with a p value smaller than 0.001.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打破本福德定律:利用欧几里得距离统计对COVID-19数据的统计分析
采用本福德定律的欧几里得距离统计检验,对各国每周新冠肺炎病例数进行了分析。在本研究考虑的100个国家和地区中,有62%的国家和地区在α = 0.05的显著水平上符合Benford定律,17%的国家和地区在0.01≤α < 0.05的显著水平上符合Benford定律,其余21%的国家和地区偏离Benford定律(p值小于0.01)。特别是,5%的国家“违反”本福德定律,p值小于0.001。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics in Transition
Statistics in Transition Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistics in Transition (SiT) is an international journal published jointly by the Polish Statistical Association (PTS) and the Central Statistical Office of Poland (CSO/GUS), which sponsors this publication. Launched in 1993, it was issued twice a year until 2006; since then it appears - under a slightly changed title, Statistics in Transition new series - three times a year; and after 2013 as a regular quarterly journal." The journal provides a forum for exchange of ideas and experience amongst members of international community of statisticians, data producers and users, including researchers, teachers, policy makers and the general public. Its initially dominating focus on statistical issues pertinent to transition from centrally planned to a market-oriented economy has gradually been extended to embracing statistical problems related to development and modernization of the system of public (official) statistics, in general.
期刊最新文献
Estimating the probability of leaving unemployment for older people in Poland using survival models with censored data Does economic freedom promote financial development? Evidence from EU countries Rotation schemes and Chebyshev polynomials A nonparametric analysis of discrete time competing risks data: a comparison of the cause-specific-hazards approach and the vertical approach Comments on „Probability vs. Nonprobability Sampling: From the Birth of Survey Sampling to the Present Day” by Graham Kalton
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1