Discussion of “Probability vs. Nonprobability Sampling: From the Birth of Survey Sampling to the Present Day” by Graham Kalton

Q4 Mathematics Statistics in Transition Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI:10.59170/stattrans-2023-033
R. Münnich
{"title":"Discussion of “Probability vs. Nonprobability Sampling: From the Birth of Survey\n Sampling to the Present Day” by Graham Kalton","authors":"R. Münnich","doi":"10.59170/stattrans-2023-033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Let me first thank Dr. Kalton for his amazing historical review of the development\n of survey sampling from its origin, contrasting purposive sampling, until now, where\n some elements of purposive sampling in terms of web or big data seem to supersede the\n well-elaborated theory of survey statistics. Shall the message be that we do not need\n any sampling courses at universities anymore, that official statistics should turn to\n modelling using data with unknown data generating processes, or actually even be\n substituted by (commercial) data krakens? Hardly so! Graham Kalton emphasises a modern\n thinking about the use of these new data sources which may also have some advantages and\n he urges future research on data integration methods using (very) different kinds of\n data while strongly taking quality aspects into account.","PeriodicalId":37985,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Transition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59170/stattrans-2023-033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Let me first thank Dr. Kalton for his amazing historical review of the development of survey sampling from its origin, contrasting purposive sampling, until now, where some elements of purposive sampling in terms of web or big data seem to supersede the well-elaborated theory of survey statistics. Shall the message be that we do not need any sampling courses at universities anymore, that official statistics should turn to modelling using data with unknown data generating processes, or actually even be substituted by (commercial) data krakens? Hardly so! Graham Kalton emphasises a modern thinking about the use of these new data sources which may also have some advantages and he urges future research on data integration methods using (very) different kinds of data while strongly taking quality aspects into account.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论格雷厄姆·卡尔顿的《概率与非概率抽样:从调查抽样的诞生到现在
首先,我要感谢Kalton博士对调查抽样从起源到发展的惊人历史回顾,对比目的性抽样,直到现在,在网络或大数据方面,目的性抽样的一些元素似乎取代了精心设计的调查统计理论。是否应该传达这样的信息:我们不再需要大学里的任何抽样课程,官方统计应该转向使用未知数据生成过程的数据建模,或者实际上甚至被(商业)数据破解器所取代?几乎所以!Graham Kalton强调使用这些新数据源的现代思维可能也有一些优势,他敦促未来研究使用(非常)不同类型的数据的数据集成方法,同时强烈考虑质量方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics in Transition
Statistics in Transition Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistics in Transition (SiT) is an international journal published jointly by the Polish Statistical Association (PTS) and the Central Statistical Office of Poland (CSO/GUS), which sponsors this publication. Launched in 1993, it was issued twice a year until 2006; since then it appears - under a slightly changed title, Statistics in Transition new series - three times a year; and after 2013 as a regular quarterly journal." The journal provides a forum for exchange of ideas and experience amongst members of international community of statisticians, data producers and users, including researchers, teachers, policy makers and the general public. Its initially dominating focus on statistical issues pertinent to transition from centrally planned to a market-oriented economy has gradually been extended to embracing statistical problems related to development and modernization of the system of public (official) statistics, in general.
期刊最新文献
Estimating the probability of leaving unemployment for older people in Poland using survival models with censored data Does economic freedom promote financial development? Evidence from EU countries Rotation schemes and Chebyshev polynomials A nonparametric analysis of discrete time competing risks data: a comparison of the cause-specific-hazards approach and the vertical approach Comments on „Probability vs. Nonprobability Sampling: From the Birth of Survey Sampling to the Present Day” by Graham Kalton
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1