The Frequency and Risk Factors for Cranial Facet Joint Violation during Pedicle Screw Instrumentation in Lumbar Spine Disorders

Essam Youssef, M. Samir, M. Makia, A. Eladawy, Mohamed Abdeen, A. Alawamry
{"title":"The Frequency and Risk Factors for Cranial Facet Joint Violation during Pedicle Screw Instrumentation in Lumbar Spine Disorders","authors":"Essam Youssef, M. Samir, M. Makia, A. Eladawy, Mohamed Abdeen, A. Alawamry","doi":"10.21608/esj.2022.106163.1204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Data: Cranial facet joint violation (FJV) by pedicle screws may increase stress to the level adjacent to the instrumentation and may contribute to adjacent segment disease (ASD). Purpose: This study determines the frequency and risk factors for cranial FJV during pedicle screw instrumentation in various lumbar spine disorders. Study Design: A retrospective study. Patients and Methods: The data and imaging of adult patients with pedicle screw instrumentation for lumbar disorders from June 2018 to June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed for cranial FJV rate and evaluated for the role of the technique of instrumentation (conventional open or percutaneous), the facet angle (FA), the lumbar level, and the type of the disorder as risk factors for this violation. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was reviewed to measure the FA using T2 axial images. Postoperative Computed Tomography (CT) scans were examined to determine and grade cranial FJV. Results: The study included 360 patients. The overall FJV rate was 17.6%. The FJV rate significantly increased among the percutaneous fixation group compared to that of the open one (29.2% vs. 15.9%, respectively, p = 0.001). Patients with FJV had significantly larger FAs (p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with significantly larger FAs had higher grades of FJV (p value < 0.001). The FJV rate significantly increased with FAs > 40.12° (p < 0.001). L5 level and degenerative disease were more prone to FJV and higher grades of violation. Conclusion: The method of fixation, FA, lumbar level, and the type of lumbar disorder were the independent predictors of cranial FJV. This study reported a higher rate of FJV among patients with percutaneous fixation. The larger the FA, the higher the FJV rate and grade, especially with FAs > 40.12°, L5 level, and degenerative disease. (2021ESJ242)","PeriodicalId":11610,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/esj.2022.106163.1204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Data: Cranial facet joint violation (FJV) by pedicle screws may increase stress to the level adjacent to the instrumentation and may contribute to adjacent segment disease (ASD). Purpose: This study determines the frequency and risk factors for cranial FJV during pedicle screw instrumentation in various lumbar spine disorders. Study Design: A retrospective study. Patients and Methods: The data and imaging of adult patients with pedicle screw instrumentation for lumbar disorders from June 2018 to June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed for cranial FJV rate and evaluated for the role of the technique of instrumentation (conventional open or percutaneous), the facet angle (FA), the lumbar level, and the type of the disorder as risk factors for this violation. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was reviewed to measure the FA using T2 axial images. Postoperative Computed Tomography (CT) scans were examined to determine and grade cranial FJV. Results: The study included 360 patients. The overall FJV rate was 17.6%. The FJV rate significantly increased among the percutaneous fixation group compared to that of the open one (29.2% vs. 15.9%, respectively, p = 0.001). Patients with FJV had significantly larger FAs (p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with significantly larger FAs had higher grades of FJV (p value < 0.001). The FJV rate significantly increased with FAs > 40.12° (p < 0.001). L5 level and degenerative disease were more prone to FJV and higher grades of violation. Conclusion: The method of fixation, FA, lumbar level, and the type of lumbar disorder were the independent predictors of cranial FJV. This study reported a higher rate of FJV among patients with percutaneous fixation. The larger the FA, the higher the FJV rate and grade, especially with FAs > 40.12°, L5 level, and degenerative disease. (2021ESJ242)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰椎疾患椎弓根螺钉内固定过程中颅小关节侵犯的频率和危险因素
背景资料:椎弓根螺钉侵犯颅骨小关节可能会将应力增加到器械附近的水平,并可能导致邻近节段疾病(ASD)。目的:本研究确定了在各种腰椎疾病的椎弓根螺钉内固定过程中发生颅骨FJV的频率和危险因素。研究设计:回顾性研究。患者和方法:回顾性回顾2018年6月至2021年6月使用椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗腰椎疾病的成年患者的数据和影像学,以了解颅骨FJV发生率,并评估内固定技术(常规开放或经皮)、小关节角(FA)、腰椎水平,以及作为这种违规的风险因素的障碍类型。回顾了术前磁共振成像(MRI)使用T2轴向图像测量FA。术后计算机断层扫描(CT)检查,以确定和分级颅骨FJB。结果:该研究包括360名患者。总FJB发生率为17.6%。与开放式固定组相比,经皮固定组的FJB发病率显著增加(分别为29.2%和15.9%,p=0.001)。FJB患者的FAs显著更大(p<0.001)。此外,FAs明显较大的患者FJV等级较高(p值<0.001)。FJV发生率随着FAs>40.12°而显著增加(p<0.001)。L5水平和退行性疾病更容易发生FJV和更高的侵犯等级。结论:固定方法、FA、腰椎水平和腰椎疾病类型是预测颅骨FJV的独立因素。本研究报告了经皮内固定患者中FJV的发生率较高。FA越大,FJB的发生率和级别越高,尤其是在FA>40.12°、L5水平和退行性疾病时。(2021ESJ242)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Extremity Peripheral Nerve Injuries: Is There Any Role of Specialized Field Hospital in the Management of Low-Velocity Penetrating Peripheral Nerve Injuries? Short-Segment Posterior Fixation with Index Level Screws versus Long-Segment Posterior Fixation in Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Awake Spine Surgery: Fad or Future? Pedicle Screw/Sublaminar Hook Fixation versus Pedicle Screw/Infraspinous Wire Fixation for Spondylolysis Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study with MSCT Assessment Absence of the Musculocutaneous Nerve While Performing Nerve Transfer Surgery in a Patient with Brachial Plexus Injury, Rare Variant, and Review of Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1