A content analysis of free smoking cessation mobile applications in the USA

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Smoking Cessation Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1017/JSC.2019.6
Juhan Lee, J. Dallery, Antonio Laracuente, Ifeoma Ibe, Samantha Joseph, J. Huo, R. Salloum
{"title":"A content analysis of free smoking cessation mobile applications in the USA","authors":"Juhan Lee, J. Dallery, Antonio Laracuente, Ifeoma Ibe, Samantha Joseph, J. Huo, R. Salloum","doi":"10.1017/JSC.2019.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate the quality and content of free smoking cessation apps and assess their adherence to the US Public Health Service guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence.In total 180 apps were downloaded from the App Store and Google Play Store in January 2018; the top-ranking 30 apps were retrieved for the search terms: ‘smoking cessation’, ‘quit smoking’, ‘stop smoking’. Technical quality was rated using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) and by assessing other characteristics, behavioral change strategies and adherence to the 5As.A total 67 free-to-download apps were identified for full review (n = 40 from the Apple App Store and n = 27 from the Google Play Store). The average MARS score was 16.2/19.0: Engagement (3.3/5.0), Functionality (4.4/5.0), Aesthetics (4.0/5.0), and Information (2.6/5.0). Overall, 43 apps allowed sharing, 12 allowed for an app community, and five required a password. The following features were observed: assessment (n = 51), feedback (n = 38), information/education (n = 45), monitoring (n = 52), and goal setting (n = 23). Significant differences were found among apps adhering to the 5As: Ask (n = 44), Advise (n = 54), Assess (n = 30), Assist (n = 62), and Arrange (n = 0).Given the growth in smoking cessation apps, future efforts should focus on improving their technical quality and adherence to the 5As.","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/JSC.2019.6","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/JSC.2019.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

To evaluate the quality and content of free smoking cessation apps and assess their adherence to the US Public Health Service guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence.In total 180 apps were downloaded from the App Store and Google Play Store in January 2018; the top-ranking 30 apps were retrieved for the search terms: ‘smoking cessation’, ‘quit smoking’, ‘stop smoking’. Technical quality was rated using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) and by assessing other characteristics, behavioral change strategies and adherence to the 5As.A total 67 free-to-download apps were identified for full review (n = 40 from the Apple App Store and n = 27 from the Google Play Store). The average MARS score was 16.2/19.0: Engagement (3.3/5.0), Functionality (4.4/5.0), Aesthetics (4.0/5.0), and Information (2.6/5.0). Overall, 43 apps allowed sharing, 12 allowed for an app community, and five required a password. The following features were observed: assessment (n = 51), feedback (n = 38), information/education (n = 45), monitoring (n = 52), and goal setting (n = 23). Significant differences were found among apps adhering to the 5As: Ask (n = 44), Advise (n = 54), Assess (n = 30), Assist (n = 62), and Arrange (n = 0).Given the growth in smoking cessation apps, future efforts should focus on improving their technical quality and adherence to the 5As.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国免费戒烟手机应用的内容分析
评估免费戒烟应用程序的质量和内容,并评估其对美国公共卫生服务局治疗烟草使用和依赖指南的遵守情况。2018年1月,共有180款应用从应用商店和谷歌Play商店下载;排名前30位的应用程序被检索到搜索词:“戒烟”、“戒烟”和“戒烟”。技术质量使用移动应用程序评分量表(MARS)进行评分,并通过评估其他特征、行为改变策略和对5As的遵守情况进行评分。共确定了67款免费下载的应用程序进行全面审查(其中40款来自苹果应用商店,27款来自谷歌Play商店)。MARS的平均得分为16.2/19.0:参与度(3.3/5.0)、功能性(4.4/50.0)、美观性(4.0/5.0)和信息性(2.6/5.0)。总体而言,43个应用程序允许共享,12个应用程序社区允许共享,5个应用程序需要密码。观察到以下特征:评估(n=51)、反馈(n=38)、信息/教育(n=45)、监测(n=52)和目标设定(n=23)。坚持5As的应用程序之间存在显著差异:询问(n=44)、建议(n=54)、评估(n=30)、协助(n=62)和安排(n=0)。鉴于戒烟应用程序的增长,未来的工作应集中在提高其技术质量和坚持5As上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
"It Is A Carrot-Stick Model": A Qualitative Study of Rural-Serving Clinician and Rural-Residing Veteran Perceptions of Requirements to Quit Smoking prior to Elective Surgery. Prevalence, Correlates, and Perception of E-cigarettes among Undergraduate Students of Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Evaluation of an Integrated Tobacco Treatment Specialist in Primary Care. The Efficacy of Individualized, Community-Based Physical Activity to Aid Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Effects of Smoking on COVID-19 Management and Mortality: An Umbrella Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1