Co-creation in youth sport development: examining (mis)alignment between coaches and parents

IF 3.7 1区 教育学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Sport Management Review Pub Date : 2022-03-25 DOI:10.1080/14413523.2022.2050107
{"title":"Co-creation in youth sport development: examining (mis)alignment between coaches and parents","authors":"Edward Horne, Leeann M. Lower-Hoppe, B. C. Green","doi":"10.1080/14413523.2022.2050107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The authors explore the challenges and opportunities for a youth sport system in an entrepreneurial marketplace by identifying areas of (mis)alignment between parents and coaches, a key partnership in youth sport development. The context of tennis was used to recruit a sample of 130 parents and 113 coaches based in the United States. Choice-based conjoint analysis was used to compare the relative importance parents and coaches place on key youth sport program attributes and their preference for specific attribute levels. Information sources were also examined. Significant differences were found between parents’ and coaches’ preferences for specific program implementations, and the importance they placed on each attribute. Univariate analyses revealed significant differences for parents’ and coaches’ preferences for levels within each attribute, although the order of preference for each level was the same. Parents and coaches also differed in the importance placed on information sources. Overall findings indicate misalignment, which may affect parent/coach collaboration and ultimately inhibit effective athlete development. However, the findings do suggest the potential for collaboration, as parents and coaches value shared responsibility. Recommendations for facilitating collaboration for more effective athlete development include reducing consumer confusion via shared language and interpretation, and stimulating co-creation via structural change. HIGHLIGHTS Youth sport parents considered coach certification the most important element of a youth sport program. Coaches placed the most importance on who had overall responsibility for athlete development. Parents and coaches saw shared responsibility for athlete development as preferrable. Relatively low preference for interaction acts as a barrier to effective co-creation.","PeriodicalId":48057,"journal":{"name":"Sport Management Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"271 - 292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2022.2050107","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT The authors explore the challenges and opportunities for a youth sport system in an entrepreneurial marketplace by identifying areas of (mis)alignment between parents and coaches, a key partnership in youth sport development. The context of tennis was used to recruit a sample of 130 parents and 113 coaches based in the United States. Choice-based conjoint analysis was used to compare the relative importance parents and coaches place on key youth sport program attributes and their preference for specific attribute levels. Information sources were also examined. Significant differences were found between parents’ and coaches’ preferences for specific program implementations, and the importance they placed on each attribute. Univariate analyses revealed significant differences for parents’ and coaches’ preferences for levels within each attribute, although the order of preference for each level was the same. Parents and coaches also differed in the importance placed on information sources. Overall findings indicate misalignment, which may affect parent/coach collaboration and ultimately inhibit effective athlete development. However, the findings do suggest the potential for collaboration, as parents and coaches value shared responsibility. Recommendations for facilitating collaboration for more effective athlete development include reducing consumer confusion via shared language and interpretation, and stimulating co-creation via structural change. HIGHLIGHTS Youth sport parents considered coach certification the most important element of a youth sport program. Coaches placed the most importance on who had overall responsibility for athlete development. Parents and coaches saw shared responsibility for athlete development as preferrable. Relatively low preference for interaction acts as a barrier to effective co-creation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年体育发展中的共同创造:考察教练和家长之间的(错误)对齐
作者通过确定家长和教练(青少年体育发展中的关键伙伴关系)之间的(错误)对齐领域,探讨了创业市场中青少年体育系统的挑战和机遇。以网球为背景,在美国招募了130名家长和113名教练作为样本。采用基于选择的联合分析比较了家长和教练员对青少年体育项目关键属性的相对重视程度及其对具体属性的偏好程度。还审查了资料来源。父母和教练对具体项目实施的偏好以及他们对每个属性的重视程度存在显著差异。单变量分析显示,尽管每个级别的偏好顺序相同,但家长和教练对每个属性内级别的偏好存在显着差异。家长和教练对信息来源的重视程度也有所不同。总体研究结果表明,这种错位可能会影响家长/教练的合作,并最终抑制运动员的有效发展。然而,研究结果确实表明了合作的潜力,因为父母和教练都重视分担责任。促进合作以更有效地发展运动员的建议包括通过共享语言和解释减少消费者的困惑,以及通过结构变化刺激共同创造。青少年体育家长认为教练认证是青少年体育项目中最重要的元素。教练们最重视的是谁对运动员的发展负有全面责任。家长和教练认为分担运动员发展的责任更可取。相对较低的互动偏好成为有效共同创造的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Youth identity formation: (Mis)alignment between urban male youth and sport coaches
IF 3.3 2区 社会学Children and Youth Services ReviewPub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105733
Tarkington J. Newman , Benjamin Jefka , Leeann M. Lower-Hoppe , Carlyn Kimiecik , Shea Brgoch , Rebecca Dillard , Kathryn Dwyer , Carter Rockhill , Donta Ingram
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Sport Management Review is published as a service to sport industries worldwide. It is a multidisciplinary journal concerned with the management, marketing, and governance of sport at all levels and in all its manifestations -- whether as an entertainment, a recreation, or an occupation. The journal encourages collaboration between scholars and practitioners. It welcomes submissions reporting research, new applications, advances in theory, and case studies. The language of publication is English. Submissions are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Pollination, cultivation, and perennialization: creating the amateur logic in collegiate sport Public perception of esports: an examination of esports image and genre differences Leadership development: relationality and temporality in professional sport Musical congruity in sports: enhancing team branding in esports and traditional sports Market demand for metaverse-based sporting events: a mixed-methods approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1