Paul Wembridge, Cathy Ngo, Thi Huong Tra Tran, Maanya Pavan Ivar
{"title":"Evaluating pharmacy high-needs criteria: a tool for identifying inpatients at risk of medication-related problems","authors":"Paul Wembridge, Cathy Ngo, Thi Huong Tra Tran, Maanya Pavan Ivar","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Clinical pharmacy services can be costly, and in resource-constrained healthcare services, should be prioritised towards patients with the greatest potential risks. At our health network, high-needs pharmacy criteria were developed to identify patients at greatest need of clinical pharmacy services. This retrospective study of 761 patients admitted to four hospitals in metropolitan Melbourne aimed to evaluate the ability of the high-needs pharmacy criteria to identify patients at increased risk of medication-related adverse clinical outcomes. Patients' clinical records were reviewed to determine if the patient met one or more elements of the high-needs criteria. Data on length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, medication-related problems, and medication-related incidents were obtained from the electronic records. Patients meeting one or more high-needs criteria had a longer length of stay (mean 6.7 days vs 3.1 days, p < 0.01), were more likely to be readmitted within 30 days (27% vs 16%, p < 0.01) and had a higher rate of medication-related problems (15% vs 7.6%, p < 0.01). The sensitivity of the high-needs criteria to identify patients with medication-related problems, medication-related incidents, or readmission within 30 days was above 80%. In conclusion, the high-needs pharmacy criteria identified older patients with longer length of stay who are at greater risk of 30-day readmission and medication-related problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"53 2","pages":"91-95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1845","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Clinical pharmacy services can be costly, and in resource-constrained healthcare services, should be prioritised towards patients with the greatest potential risks. At our health network, high-needs pharmacy criteria were developed to identify patients at greatest need of clinical pharmacy services. This retrospective study of 761 patients admitted to four hospitals in metropolitan Melbourne aimed to evaluate the ability of the high-needs pharmacy criteria to identify patients at increased risk of medication-related adverse clinical outcomes. Patients' clinical records were reviewed to determine if the patient met one or more elements of the high-needs criteria. Data on length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, medication-related problems, and medication-related incidents were obtained from the electronic records. Patients meeting one or more high-needs criteria had a longer length of stay (mean 6.7 days vs 3.1 days, p < 0.01), were more likely to be readmitted within 30 days (27% vs 16%, p < 0.01) and had a higher rate of medication-related problems (15% vs 7.6%, p < 0.01). The sensitivity of the high-needs criteria to identify patients with medication-related problems, medication-related incidents, or readmission within 30 days was above 80%. In conclusion, the high-needs pharmacy criteria identified older patients with longer length of stay who are at greater risk of 30-day readmission and medication-related problems.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.