Evaluating pharmacy high-needs criteria: a tool for identifying inpatients at risk of medication-related problems

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI:10.1002/jppr.1845
Paul Wembridge, Cathy Ngo, Thi Huong Tra Tran, Maanya Pavan Ivar
{"title":"Evaluating pharmacy high-needs criteria: a tool for identifying inpatients at risk of medication-related problems","authors":"Paul Wembridge,&nbsp;Cathy Ngo,&nbsp;Thi Huong Tra Tran,&nbsp;Maanya Pavan Ivar","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Clinical pharmacy services can be costly, and in resource-constrained healthcare services, should be prioritised towards patients with the greatest potential risks. At our health network, high-needs pharmacy criteria were developed to identify patients at greatest need of clinical pharmacy services. This retrospective study of 761 patients admitted to four hospitals in metropolitan Melbourne aimed to evaluate the ability of the high-needs pharmacy criteria to identify patients at increased risk of medication-related adverse clinical outcomes. Patients' clinical records were reviewed to determine if the patient met one or more elements of the high-needs criteria. Data on length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, medication-related problems, and medication-related incidents were obtained from the electronic records. Patients meeting one or more high-needs criteria had a longer length of stay (mean 6.7 days vs 3.1 days, p &lt; 0.01), were more likely to be readmitted within 30 days (27% vs 16%, p &lt; 0.01) and had a higher rate of medication-related problems (15% vs 7.6%, p &lt; 0.01). The sensitivity of the high-needs criteria to identify patients with medication-related problems, medication-related incidents, or readmission within 30 days was above 80%. In conclusion, the high-needs pharmacy criteria identified older patients with longer length of stay who are at greater risk of 30-day readmission and medication-related problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"53 2","pages":"91-95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1845","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical pharmacy services can be costly, and in resource-constrained healthcare services, should be prioritised towards patients with the greatest potential risks. At our health network, high-needs pharmacy criteria were developed to identify patients at greatest need of clinical pharmacy services. This retrospective study of 761 patients admitted to four hospitals in metropolitan Melbourne aimed to evaluate the ability of the high-needs pharmacy criteria to identify patients at increased risk of medication-related adverse clinical outcomes. Patients' clinical records were reviewed to determine if the patient met one or more elements of the high-needs criteria. Data on length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, medication-related problems, and medication-related incidents were obtained from the electronic records. Patients meeting one or more high-needs criteria had a longer length of stay (mean 6.7 days vs 3.1 days, p < 0.01), were more likely to be readmitted within 30 days (27% vs 16%, p < 0.01) and had a higher rate of medication-related problems (15% vs 7.6%, p < 0.01). The sensitivity of the high-needs criteria to identify patients with medication-related problems, medication-related incidents, or readmission within 30 days was above 80%. In conclusion, the high-needs pharmacy criteria identified older patients with longer length of stay who are at greater risk of 30-day readmission and medication-related problems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估药房高需求标准:识别有药物相关问题风险的住院患者的工具
临床药学服务可能是昂贵的,在资源有限的卫生保健服务中,应优先考虑潜在风险最大的患者。在我们的健康网络中,制定了高需求药房标准,以确定最需要临床药房服务的患者。本回顾性研究纳入了墨尔本市区四家医院的761名患者,旨在评估高需求药房标准识别药物相关不良临床结果风险增加患者的能力。回顾患者的临床记录以确定患者是否满足高需求标准的一个或多个要素。住院时间、30天再入院率、药物相关问题和药物相关事件的数据均来自电子记录。满足一个或多个高需求标准的患者住院时间更长(平均6.7天对3.1天,p < 0.01), 30天内再次入院的可能性更大(27%对16%,p < 0.01),药物相关问题发生率更高(15%对7.6%,p < 0.01)。高需求标准用于识别30天内存在药物相关问题、药物相关事件或再入院的患者的敏感性高于80%。总之,高需求药房标准确定了住院时间较长的老年患者,他们30天再入院和药物相关问题的风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Standard of practice for pharmacy services specialising in transitions of care Active Ingredient Prescribing in Australia: exploring pharmacists' experiences A surgical preadmission pharmacist service in a tertiary paediatric hospital: a pilot study The pharmacologic management of status epilepticus in pregnant patients: a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1