Incidental Jurisdiction in Investment Treaty Arbitration and the Question of Party Consent

IF 1.2 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AJIL Unbound Pub Date : 2022-06-20 DOI:10.1017/aju.2022.29
Relja Radović
{"title":"Incidental Jurisdiction in Investment Treaty Arbitration and the Question of Party Consent","authors":"Relja Radović","doi":"10.1017/aju.2022.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arbitral tribunals in investment treaty arbitration have not contributed much to the theoretical development of the concept of incidental jurisdiction, even though they have occasionally exercised it in practice. One possible explanation for their apparent reluctance to make explicit and greater use of the concept of incidental jurisdiction is the tendency to adopt a strict approach to jurisdiction governed by party consent. In this essay, I argue that incidental jurisdiction is not in tension with the consensual foundations of international jurisdiction when it is viewed as one inherent power of international courts and tribunals. Key to this argument is that incidental determinations are not binding, and therefore do not need to fall within party-defined jurisdictional limits.","PeriodicalId":36818,"journal":{"name":"AJIL Unbound","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJIL Unbound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2022.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Arbitral tribunals in investment treaty arbitration have not contributed much to the theoretical development of the concept of incidental jurisdiction, even though they have occasionally exercised it in practice. One possible explanation for their apparent reluctance to make explicit and greater use of the concept of incidental jurisdiction is the tendency to adopt a strict approach to jurisdiction governed by party consent. In this essay, I argue that incidental jurisdiction is not in tension with the consensual foundations of international jurisdiction when it is viewed as one inherent power of international courts and tribunals. Key to this argument is that incidental determinations are not binding, and therefore do not need to fall within party-defined jurisdictional limits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投资条约仲裁中的附带管辖权与当事人同意问题
投资条约仲裁中的仲裁庭对附带管辖权概念的理论发展没有太大贡献,尽管它们在实践中偶尔会行使这一概念。他们显然不愿明确和更多地使用附带管辖权的概念,一个可能的解释是倾向于对当事人同意管辖的管辖权采取严格的做法。在这篇文章中,我认为,当附带管辖权被视为国际法院和法庭的一种固有权力时,它与国际管辖权的协商一致基础并不紧张。这一论点的关键是,附带裁决不具有约束力,因此不需要落入当事人定义的管辖范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJIL Unbound
AJIL Unbound Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Introduction to the Symposium on International Laws Public and Private The Private as a Core Part of International Law: The School of Salamanca, Slavery, and Marriage (Sixteenth Century) Gendering Public and Private International Law: Transversal Legal Histories of the State, Market, and the Family through Women's Private Property Rights Lawyers, Archivists, and the Turn to Transparency in the French State Foreign Relations Law as a Method of Private International Law's Theoretical Self-Reflection and Critique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1