Effect of partial nephrectomy with positive margin on recurrence and metastasis in patients with renal cancer: a Meta-analysis

Sheng Zeng, Z. Bai, Zhe Li, Hong-shun Ma, Qian Liu
{"title":"Effect of partial nephrectomy with positive margin on recurrence and metastasis in patients with renal cancer: a Meta-analysis","authors":"Sheng Zeng, Z. Bai, Zhe Li, Hong-shun Ma, Qian Liu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2019.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nSystematic assessment of the effect of positive margin on recurrence and metastasis in patients with renal cell carcinoma who underwent partial nephrectomy. \n \n \nMethods \nThe literature were searched on the rate of recurrence and metastasis in patients with positive margin and partial nephrectomy published in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, China Biomedical Literature Database, China Knowledge Network, VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wanfang Chinese Database up to December 2018. The quality of the literature included in this study was evaluated by two reviewers, and a meta-analysis was performed on the literature that met the inclusion criteria using the Revman 5.0 statistical software provided by Cochrane Collaboration. \n \n \nResults \nA total of seven articles were included, six of which were case-control studies, and the other one was a cohort study. These seven articles consisted of 6 928 patients, including 407 positive margins and 6 521 negative margins. For recurrence and metastasis, 407 positive margins were composed of 25 recurrences and 21 distant metastases, while 6 521 negative margins consisted of 68 recurrence and 96 distant metastasis. The disease-free survival rate of patients with positive margins is lower than that with negative margins (OR=4.92, 95%CI 2.66-9.08, P<0.001). The results of subgroup analysis of patients with recurrence and metastasis based on positive margin exhibited that positive margin increased the risk of recurrence in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (OR=5.05, 95%CI 2.06-12.37, P<0.001), as well as the risk of metastasis (OR=3.70, 95%CI 2.18-6.26, P<0.001). Since different studies consisted of patients with different tumor staging, a stratified analysis was conducted and the disease-free survival rate of patients with positive margins decreased compared with that of negative margins (OR=4.13, 95%CI 2.54-6.70, P<0.001), although there were differences in the staging of tumor patients included in different studies, which did not weaken the results. \n \n \nConclusions \nPositive margins increase the risk of recurrence and metastasis in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. \n \n \nKey words: \nKidney neoplasms; Partial nephrectomy; Positive margin; Recurrence; Metastasis; Meta-analysis","PeriodicalId":10343,"journal":{"name":"中华泌尿外科杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华泌尿外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2019.10.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Systematic assessment of the effect of positive margin on recurrence and metastasis in patients with renal cell carcinoma who underwent partial nephrectomy. Methods The literature were searched on the rate of recurrence and metastasis in patients with positive margin and partial nephrectomy published in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, China Biomedical Literature Database, China Knowledge Network, VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wanfang Chinese Database up to December 2018. The quality of the literature included in this study was evaluated by two reviewers, and a meta-analysis was performed on the literature that met the inclusion criteria using the Revman 5.0 statistical software provided by Cochrane Collaboration. Results A total of seven articles were included, six of which were case-control studies, and the other one was a cohort study. These seven articles consisted of 6 928 patients, including 407 positive margins and 6 521 negative margins. For recurrence and metastasis, 407 positive margins were composed of 25 recurrences and 21 distant metastases, while 6 521 negative margins consisted of 68 recurrence and 96 distant metastasis. The disease-free survival rate of patients with positive margins is lower than that with negative margins (OR=4.92, 95%CI 2.66-9.08, P<0.001). The results of subgroup analysis of patients with recurrence and metastasis based on positive margin exhibited that positive margin increased the risk of recurrence in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (OR=5.05, 95%CI 2.06-12.37, P<0.001), as well as the risk of metastasis (OR=3.70, 95%CI 2.18-6.26, P<0.001). Since different studies consisted of patients with different tumor staging, a stratified analysis was conducted and the disease-free survival rate of patients with positive margins decreased compared with that of negative margins (OR=4.13, 95%CI 2.54-6.70, P<0.001), although there were differences in the staging of tumor patients included in different studies, which did not weaken the results. Conclusions Positive margins increase the risk of recurrence and metastasis in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. Key words: Kidney neoplasms; Partial nephrectomy; Positive margin; Recurrence; Metastasis; Meta-analysis
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边缘呈阳性的部分肾切除术对肾癌复发和转移的影响:一项荟萃分析
目的系统评价阳性切缘对肾细胞癌部分切除后复发转移的影响。方法检索截至2018年12月PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知识网、维普中文科技期刊库、万方中文数据库中发表的关于肾缘和部分切除阳性患者复发转移率的文献。本研究纳入的文献质量由两位审稿人进行评估,并使用Cochrane Collaboration提供的Revman 5.0统计软件对符合纳入标准的文献进行meta分析。结果共纳入7篇文献,其中6篇为病例对照研究,1篇为队列研究。这7篇文章包括6 928例患者,其中阳性切缘407例,阴性切缘6 521例。407例阳性切缘复发25例,远处转移21例;6521例阴性切缘复发68例,远处转移96例。切缘阳性患者的无病生存率低于切缘阴性患者(OR=4.92, 95%CI 2.66 ~ 9.08, P<0.001)。基于阳性切缘的复发转移患者亚组分析结果显示,阳性切缘增加部分肾切除术患者复发风险(OR=5.05, 95%CI 2.06 ~ 12.37, P<0.001)和转移风险(OR=3.70, 95%CI 2.18 ~ 6.26, P<0.001)。由于不同研究纳入的患者肿瘤分期不同,我们进行了分层分析,虽然不同研究纳入的肿瘤患者的分期存在差异,但阳性切缘患者的无病生存率较阴性切缘患者降低(OR=4.13, 95%CI 2.54-6.70, P<0.001),但这并没有削弱结果。结论切缘阳性增加了部分肾切除术患者复发和转移的风险。关键词:肾肿瘤;部分切除;积极的保证金;复发;转移;荟萃分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华泌尿外科杂志
中华泌尿外科杂志 Medicine-Nephrology
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14180
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Urology (monthly) was founded in 1980. It is a publicly issued academic journal supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology and sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association. It mainly publishes original research papers, reviews and comments in this field. This journal mainly reports on the latest scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the professional field of urology at home and abroad, as well as basic theoretical research results closely related to clinical practice. The journal has columns such as treatises, abstracts of treatises, experimental studies, case reports, experience exchanges, reviews, reviews, lectures, etc. Chinese Journal of Urology has been included in well-known databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Chinese Science Citation Database Source Journal (including extended version), and also included in American Chemical Abstracts (CA). The journal has been rated as a quality journal by the Association for Science and Technology and as an excellent journal by the Chinese Medical Association.
期刊最新文献
Clinical application of different bladder neck separation techniques in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Analysis of risk factors for acute kidney injury after radical nephrectomy Characteristics of urinary microflora in women with type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy without lower urinary tract symptoms A case report of primary leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord Establishment and validation of nomogram for positive surgical margin of prostate cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1