Anonymity, Piracy and Counterfeiting in the Polish Language Publications in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the 2nd Half of the 16th Century

Q2 Arts and Humanities Knygotyra Pub Date : 2023-07-18 DOI:10.15388/knygotyra.2023.80.129
Tomas Petreikis
{"title":"Anonymity, Piracy and Counterfeiting in the Polish Language Publications in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the 2nd Half of the 16th Century","authors":"Tomas Petreikis","doi":"10.15388/knygotyra.2023.80.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the grounds of the bibliographic analysis of the publications in the Polish language in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the second half of the 16th century, this article reconstructs the phenomena of anonymity, counterfeiting and piracy. In this country, the life of the printed media was fairly liberal and hardly restricted at all. In the course of political and religious struggles, authors, translators, publishers and compilers frequently preferred to conceal the data on the real authorship and typography in their publications. Political and religious factions had to consider the opinion of the ruler and their seniority; therefore, only anonymous impact on the public opinion allowed ensuring the defense of one’s attitudes and the desired impact on the society. This strategy of anonymity was protecting the stakeholders from getting into trouble, while also expanding the scope of commercial activity for the typographers. The phenomenon of piracy was also being promoted by the different legal regulation of the printed media in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Kingdom of Poland, and, due to the physically vast distances, the feeling of impunity developed. The authors and typographers were acting honestly in such cases when the published literature contained no controversial materials, or when they had the solid backing of the powers, and also in the cases when legal protection of the printed media was ensured.","PeriodicalId":37220,"journal":{"name":"Knygotyra","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knygotyra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/knygotyra.2023.80.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On the grounds of the bibliographic analysis of the publications in the Polish language in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the second half of the 16th century, this article reconstructs the phenomena of anonymity, counterfeiting and piracy. In this country, the life of the printed media was fairly liberal and hardly restricted at all. In the course of political and religious struggles, authors, translators, publishers and compilers frequently preferred to conceal the data on the real authorship and typography in their publications. Political and religious factions had to consider the opinion of the ruler and their seniority; therefore, only anonymous impact on the public opinion allowed ensuring the defense of one’s attitudes and the desired impact on the society. This strategy of anonymity was protecting the stakeholders from getting into trouble, while also expanding the scope of commercial activity for the typographers. The phenomenon of piracy was also being promoted by the different legal regulation of the printed media in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Kingdom of Poland, and, due to the physically vast distances, the feeling of impunity developed. The authors and typographers were acting honestly in such cases when the published literature contained no controversial materials, or when they had the solid backing of the powers, and also in the cases when legal protection of the printed media was ensured.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
16世纪下半叶立陶宛大公国波兰语出版物中的匿名、盗版和假冒
本文在对16世纪下半叶立陶宛大公国波兰语出版物书目分析的基础上,重构了匿名、假冒和盗版现象。在这个国家,印刷媒体的生活相当自由,几乎没有任何限制。在政治和宗教斗争的过程中,作者、译者、出版商和编者往往倾向于在出版物中隐藏真实作者和版式的数据。政治和宗教派别必须考虑统治者的意见和他们的资历;因此,只有对舆论的匿名影响才能确保对自己态度的辩护和对社会的预期影响。这种匿名策略保护了利益相关者免于陷入麻烦,同时也扩大了印刷商的商业活动范围。立陶宛大公国和波兰王国对印刷媒体的不同法律规定也助长了盗版现象,而且由于地理上的遥远距离,产生了不受惩罚的感觉。当出版的文献不含有争议的材料时,或者当他们有权力的坚实支持时,以及在印刷媒体得到法律保护的情况下,作者和印刷工人都是诚实的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Knygotyra
Knygotyra Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nespaustuvinė periodika Vrublevskių bibliotekoje: ką Lietuvos leidybos istorijai pasakoja rinkinys? From Spy to Editor – Informants of Elżbieta Sieniawska née Lubomirska (d. 1729), Wife of the Castellan of Krakow Legal Disputes of Emigrant Periodical Publishers from the End of the 19th Century to 1904 Neformalių XX a. pabaigos – XXI a. pradžios Lietuvos jaunimo leidinių – fanzinų – leidybos tendencijos Knygotyros 80 tomų: iškilmingas minėjimas Vilniaus universiteto bibliotekoje
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1