Dear Editor: Critically Engaging with Global Issues and Developing Arguments in a Letter to the Editor Assignment

IF 1.8 1区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Studies Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-11-15 DOI:10.1093/isp/ekac017
J. Robertson
{"title":"Dear Editor: Critically Engaging with Global Issues and Developing Arguments in a Letter to the Editor Assignment","authors":"J. Robertson","doi":"10.1093/isp/ekac017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study presents a teaching experiment in which students composed a letter to the editor that drew on political economy analysis with an impressive 40 percent publication rate in a major Asian newspaper. In contrast to a purely mock exercise, or the submission of op-ed pieces with a much lower chance of being published, this activity offered students the opportunity to communicate their positions to the community. Instructors must be attuned to privacy concerns and the article appraises the advantages and disadvantages of four approaches to public writing. Results from a questionnaire and focus groups indicated that this short-form writing helped students to construct a single argument, broaden their global outlook, critically assess media information, and develop a more concise writing style. However, some students struggled to connect their letter to the course content. The article thus ends by proposing ways that the assignment may be modified, such as linking letters to another assignment, supporting students by sharing suggestions from newspaper editors and scholars whose letters are regularly published, and outlining a collaborative writing exercise building on letters to the editor as a foundation. By improving their public writing skills, this assignment may prove useful in the online lives of students.","PeriodicalId":47002,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Studies Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekac017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a teaching experiment in which students composed a letter to the editor that drew on political economy analysis with an impressive 40 percent publication rate in a major Asian newspaper. In contrast to a purely mock exercise, or the submission of op-ed pieces with a much lower chance of being published, this activity offered students the opportunity to communicate their positions to the community. Instructors must be attuned to privacy concerns and the article appraises the advantages and disadvantages of four approaches to public writing. Results from a questionnaire and focus groups indicated that this short-form writing helped students to construct a single argument, broaden their global outlook, critically assess media information, and develop a more concise writing style. However, some students struggled to connect their letter to the course content. The article thus ends by proposing ways that the assignment may be modified, such as linking letters to another assignment, supporting students by sharing suggestions from newspaper editors and scholars whose letters are regularly published, and outlining a collaborative writing exercise building on letters to the editor as a foundation. By improving their public writing skills, this assignment may prove useful in the online lives of students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲爱的编辑:在给编辑的一封信中,批判性地参与全球问题并发展论点
这项研究提出了一个教学实验,学生们根据政治经济学分析给编辑写了一封信,在亚洲一家主要报纸上的发表率高达40%。与纯粹的模拟练习或发表几率低得多的专栏文章相比,这项活动为学生提供了向社区传达自己立场的机会。讲师必须注意隐私问题,文章评估了四种公共写作方法的优缺点。问卷调查和焦点小组的结果表明,这种简短的写作有助于学生构建单一的论点,拓宽他们的全球视野,批判性地评估媒体信息,并发展出更简洁的写作风格。然而,一些学生很难将他们的信与课程内容联系起来。因此,文章最后提出了修改作业的方法,例如将信件与另一项作业联系起来,通过分享定期发表信件的报纸编辑和学者的建议来支持学生,并概述了以给编辑的信件为基础的合作写作练习。通过提高他们的公共写作技能,这项作业可能会在学生的网络生活中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Studies Perspectives
International Studies Perspectives INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: International Studies Perspectives (ISP) publishes peer-reviewed articles that bridge the interests of researchers, teachers, and practitioners working within any and all subfields of international studies.
期刊最新文献
Learning Goals in Simulations Carlos Fortin, Jorge Heine and Carlos Ominami (Eds), Latin American Foreign Policies in the New World Order: The Active Non-Alignment Option (New York: Anthem Press, 2023) Re-Imagining Peace Education: Using Critical Pedagogy as a Transformative Tool The Port of Berbera and Geopolitics of the Western Indian Ocean Student-Designed Simulation: Teaching Global Governance in Practice through a Student-Led Role-Play for Practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1