The Changing Landscape of Women's Rights Activism in China: The Continued Legacy of the Beijing Conference

Rangeeta De Silva de Alwis, Katherine Schroeder
{"title":"The Changing Landscape of Women's Rights Activism in China: The Continued Legacy of the Beijing Conference","authors":"Rangeeta De Silva de Alwis, Katherine Schroeder","doi":"10.5070/l328155785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Beijing Conference was a watershed moment in the history of the global women’s movement and had an unprecedented impact in the Global North and South on lawmaking, institution building, and movement building. This Article details the development of women’s activism in China since the Beijing Conference and how a changing legal landscape impacts this activism. While its progress is emblematic of the inconsistencies in the progression of women’s rights activism since the Beijing Conference, China’s efforts have been significant and varied and represent a model for other countries seeking to reform women’s rights legislation. This Article identifies important lines of inquiry that merit further investigation in China and offers insights for conducting similar investigations elsewhere. This Article also outlines a framework for the shifting nature of women’s legal activism from 1995 to 2020 and the ways that the international community can capitalize on these changes and continue to galvanize efforts toward legislative and cultural reform. This Article concludes that the Beijing Conference’s goals may be actualized with financial backing and an apolitical and academic focus, and asserts that increased unity among activist groups is needed in China. 1. The authors engaged in extensive conversations with former Ford Foundation Program Officers Titi Liu at Stanford Law School and Katherine Wilhelm at New York University Law School. We are especially grateful to the guidance of preeminent women’s rights activists in China, including Cai Yiping, Guo Jianmei, and Xiaonan Liu. Younger scholars who have requested anonymity have also contributed to our understanding of the evolution of the contemporary women’s rights movement in China. © 2021 Rangita de Silva de Alwis and Katherine Schroeder. All rights reserved. 8 Vol. 28.7 UCLA WOMEN’S LAW JOURNAL","PeriodicalId":83388,"journal":{"name":"UCLA women's law journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCLA women's law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/l328155785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Beijing Conference was a watershed moment in the history of the global women’s movement and had an unprecedented impact in the Global North and South on lawmaking, institution building, and movement building. This Article details the development of women’s activism in China since the Beijing Conference and how a changing legal landscape impacts this activism. While its progress is emblematic of the inconsistencies in the progression of women’s rights activism since the Beijing Conference, China’s efforts have been significant and varied and represent a model for other countries seeking to reform women’s rights legislation. This Article identifies important lines of inquiry that merit further investigation in China and offers insights for conducting similar investigations elsewhere. This Article also outlines a framework for the shifting nature of women’s legal activism from 1995 to 2020 and the ways that the international community can capitalize on these changes and continue to galvanize efforts toward legislative and cultural reform. This Article concludes that the Beijing Conference’s goals may be actualized with financial backing and an apolitical and academic focus, and asserts that increased unity among activist groups is needed in China. 1. The authors engaged in extensive conversations with former Ford Foundation Program Officers Titi Liu at Stanford Law School and Katherine Wilhelm at New York University Law School. We are especially grateful to the guidance of preeminent women’s rights activists in China, including Cai Yiping, Guo Jianmei, and Xiaonan Liu. Younger scholars who have requested anonymity have also contributed to our understanding of the evolution of the contemporary women’s rights movement in China. © 2021 Rangita de Silva de Alwis and Katherine Schroeder. All rights reserved. 8 Vol. 28.7 UCLA WOMEN’S LAW JOURNAL
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国女权运动的变迁:北京会议的延续
北京会议是全球妇女运动史上的一个分水岭,在全球南北各国的立法、制度建设、运动建设等方面都产生了前所未有的影响。本文详细介绍了自北京会议以来中国妇女行动主义的发展,以及不断变化的法律环境如何影响这种行动主义。虽然它的进展象征着自北京会议以来妇女权利活动进展的不一致,但中国的努力是重要的和多样的,并为其他寻求改革妇女权利立法的国家树立了榜样。本文确定了值得在中国进一步调查的重要调查线索,并为在其他地方进行类似调查提供了见解。本文还概述了从1995年到2020年妇女法律行动主义性质变化的框架,以及国际社会利用这些变化并继续推动立法和文化改革的方式。本文的结论是,北京会议的目标可以在财政支持和非政治和学术关注的情况下实现,并断言中国需要加强活动家团体之间的团结。作者与斯坦福大学法学院的前福特基金会项目官员蒂蒂·刘和纽约大学法学院的凯瑟琳·威廉进行了广泛的对话。我们特别感谢蔡一平、郭建梅和刘晓楠等中国杰出的女权活动人士的指导。要求匿名的年轻学者也为我们理解当代中国女权运动的演变做出了贡献。©2021 Rangita de Silva de Alwis和Katherine Schroeder。版权所有。第8卷第28.7期加州大学洛杉矶分校妇女法律杂志
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What's Love Got to Do with It? Anti-Love Jihad Laws and the Othering of Muslims in India Self-Defense, Responsibility, and Punishment: Rethinking the Criminalization of Women Who Kill Their Abusive Intimate Partners Stolen Voices: A Linguistic Approach to Understanding Implicit Gender Bias in the Legal Profession Limitations of Current Menstrual Equity Advocacy and a Path Towards Justice Black Women Victims of Police Brutality and the Silencing of Their Stories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1