Using a variety of machine learning approaches to predict and map topsoil pH of arable land on a regional scale

Yueqi Sun, Xiaomei Sun, Zhenfu Wu, Junying Yan, Chongyang Ma, Jingyi Zhang, Yanfeng Zhao, Jie Chen
{"title":"Using a variety of machine learning approaches to predict and map topsoil pH of arable land on a regional scale","authors":"Yueqi Sun,&nbsp;Xiaomei Sun,&nbsp;Zhenfu Wu,&nbsp;Junying Yan,&nbsp;Chongyang Ma,&nbsp;Jingyi Zhang,&nbsp;Yanfeng Zhao,&nbsp;Jie Chen","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In order to accurately predict soil properties, various machine learning (ML) approaches and hybrid models constructed by integrating ML into regression kriging framework were used to predict and map arable land topsoil pH in Henan province, central China. Random forest (RF), cubist (Cu), support vector machine, artificial neural network, multiple linear regression, classification and regression trees (CART) and their hybrid models were compared for pH accuracy prediction. Among all standalone ML models, RF had the best predictive performance, in terms of the metrics employed in this study, followed by Cu, and CART was the worst. Compared with their ML counterparts, hybrid models could improve the accuracy of topsoil pH prediction to various extents. The accuracy improvement of the hybrid models constructed based on the simple ML was much greater than that based on the complex ensemble ML. Except for artificial neural network kriging , there was no significant difference between different hybrid models in the predicted results of topsoil pH. The outputs from the best predictive models showed that weak acidic soils and weak alkaline soils were the dominant arable soils in the study region, accounting for more than 30% and more than 50% of the total arable land area respectively, the topsoil pH of arable land in the north of the study area is generally higher than that in the south. Boruta variable selection revealed that altitude, climatic covariates closely related to soil moisture availability and some soil properties were the most critical factors affecting and controlling the topsoil pH of arable land.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"87 3","pages":"613-630"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to accurately predict soil properties, various machine learning (ML) approaches and hybrid models constructed by integrating ML into regression kriging framework were used to predict and map arable land topsoil pH in Henan province, central China. Random forest (RF), cubist (Cu), support vector machine, artificial neural network, multiple linear regression, classification and regression trees (CART) and their hybrid models were compared for pH accuracy prediction. Among all standalone ML models, RF had the best predictive performance, in terms of the metrics employed in this study, followed by Cu, and CART was the worst. Compared with their ML counterparts, hybrid models could improve the accuracy of topsoil pH prediction to various extents. The accuracy improvement of the hybrid models constructed based on the simple ML was much greater than that based on the complex ensemble ML. Except for artificial neural network kriging , there was no significant difference between different hybrid models in the predicted results of topsoil pH. The outputs from the best predictive models showed that weak acidic soils and weak alkaline soils were the dominant arable soils in the study region, accounting for more than 30% and more than 50% of the total arable land area respectively, the topsoil pH of arable land in the north of the study area is generally higher than that in the south. Boruta variable selection revealed that altitude, climatic covariates closely related to soil moisture availability and some soil properties were the most critical factors affecting and controlling the topsoil pH of arable land.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用各种机器学习方法来预测和绘制区域范围内可耕地表土pH值
为了准确预测土壤性质,采用多种机器学习方法以及将机器学习与回归克里格框架相结合构建的混合模型,对河南省耕地表层土壤pH值进行了预测和制图。比较了随机森林(RF)、立体模型(Cu)、支持向量机(support vector machine)、人工神经网络(artificial neural network)、多元线性回归、分类回归树(CART)及其混合模型对pH精度的预测效果。在所有独立的ML模型中,就本研究中使用的指标而言,RF具有最佳的预测性能,其次是Cu,而CART最差。与ML模型相比,混合模型能在不同程度上提高表层土壤pH值的预测精度。除人工神经网络克里格法外,不同混合模型对表层土壤ph的预测结果差异不显著。最佳预测模型的输出结果表明,弱酸性土壤和弱碱性土壤是研究区耕地土壤的优势土壤。研究区北部耕地表层土壤pH值普遍高于南部,分别占总耕地面积的30%以上和50%以上。Boruta变量选择结果表明,海拔高度、与土壤水分有效性密切相关的气候协变量和部分土壤性质是影响和控制耕地表层土壤pH的最关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oxidation dynamics and leaching behavior of elemental sulfur fertilizers in tropical soils with contrasting textures Interactive effects of no-till, cereal rye, and softwood pine-derived biochar on soil health of a no-till northern soybean system Lignin-based amendments improve wheat growth and water use efficiency in acidic soils under deficit irrigation Effects of eucalyptus thinning on soil chemical attributes in an unfertilized silvopastoral system 6 years after thinning Repeated use of anion-exchange membranes in soils alters the membrane surface and phosphate-P exchange capacity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1