From animal personality to animal individuality in farm animals – a review

IF 1.8 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Annals of Animal Science Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI:10.2478/aoas-2023-0053
K. Adamczyk, J. Nowicki, Z. Wróblewski, Anna Dutkowska
{"title":"From animal personality to animal individuality in farm animals – a review","authors":"K. Adamczyk, J. Nowicki, Z. Wróblewski, Anna Dutkowska","doi":"10.2478/aoas-2023-0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As a result of the domestication process and systematic breeding, livestock species have been shaped as donors of animal goods for humans. The animals’ role so defined, which has remained unchanged for millennia, now faces criticism from intellectuals (posthumanism), pro-animal activists, and increasingly often, postmodern societies. The core aspect of this growing conflict can be described as a relationship between the personality/individuality of farm animals, animals as persons/nonpersons, and animals as moral subjects/agents. This review aims to discuss these relationships in the context of the current state of ethical reflection and knowledge, and in relation to the future of livestock production. It presents problems of definition and research methodology in the field of animal personality, with particular reference to farm animals, characterises the dilemmas of the moral status of animals in the personality/individuality of farm animals – animals as persons/nonpersons – animals as moral subjects/agents, and discusses the relationship between farm animal personality and animal individuality; moreover, it undertakes to analyse the possibilities of individualised treatment of farm animals at the level of future livestock production. It concludes, among other things, that the concept of “animal personality” in relation to farm animals remains undefined in both research and social spaces. While livestock animals remain moral subjects, some ethical concepts attribute to them a wider range of rights intended for personal moral agents. At the same time, it was noted that an individualised approach to animals appears to be one of the most important directions for sourcing food of animal origin in the future, in line with a systematically increasing level of animal welfare.","PeriodicalId":8235,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Animal Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2023-0053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract As a result of the domestication process and systematic breeding, livestock species have been shaped as donors of animal goods for humans. The animals’ role so defined, which has remained unchanged for millennia, now faces criticism from intellectuals (posthumanism), pro-animal activists, and increasingly often, postmodern societies. The core aspect of this growing conflict can be described as a relationship between the personality/individuality of farm animals, animals as persons/nonpersons, and animals as moral subjects/agents. This review aims to discuss these relationships in the context of the current state of ethical reflection and knowledge, and in relation to the future of livestock production. It presents problems of definition and research methodology in the field of animal personality, with particular reference to farm animals, characterises the dilemmas of the moral status of animals in the personality/individuality of farm animals – animals as persons/nonpersons – animals as moral subjects/agents, and discusses the relationship between farm animal personality and animal individuality; moreover, it undertakes to analyse the possibilities of individualised treatment of farm animals at the level of future livestock production. It concludes, among other things, that the concept of “animal personality” in relation to farm animals remains undefined in both research and social spaces. While livestock animals remain moral subjects, some ethical concepts attribute to them a wider range of rights intended for personal moral agents. At the same time, it was noted that an individualised approach to animals appears to be one of the most important directions for sourcing food of animal origin in the future, in line with a systematically increasing level of animal welfare.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从动物个性到农场动物个性——综述
摘要由于驯化过程和系统繁殖,牲畜物种已被塑造成人类动物商品的捐赠者。数千年来,动物的角色一直没有改变,现在面临着知识分子(后人道主义)、亲动物活动家以及越来越多的后现代社会的批评。这种日益增长的冲突的核心方面可以描述为农场动物的个性/个性、动物作为人/非人以及动物作为道德主体/代理人之间的关系。本综述旨在结合当前的伦理反思和知识状况,以及畜牧业生产的未来,讨论这些关系。它提出了动物人格领域的定义和研究方法论问题,特别是农场动物,描述了动物的道德地位在农场动物的人格/个性中的困境——动物是人/非人——动物是道德主体/代理人,探讨了农场动物个性与动物个性的关系;此外,它还承诺分析在未来畜牧生产水平上对农场动物进行个性化处理的可能性。除其他外,它得出的结论是,与农场动物相关的“动物个性”概念在研究和社会空间中仍然没有定义。虽然家畜仍然是道德主体,但一些伦理概念赋予了它们更广泛的权利,这些权利是为个人道德代理人准备的。与此同时,有人指出,随着动物福利水平的系统性提高,对动物的个性化处理似乎是未来采购动物源性食物的最重要方向之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Animal Science
Annals of Animal Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
138
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Animal Science accepts original papers and reviews from the different topics of animal science: genetic and farm animal breeding, the biology, physiology and reproduction of animals, animal nutrition and feedstuffs, environment, hygiene and animal production technology, quality of animal origin products, economics and the organization of animal production.
期刊最新文献
Dietary fish oil sparing with blended vegetable oils on growth, fatty acid composition and lipid-metabolism-related genes expression in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Effects of different salinity levels on performance of Nile tilapia fingerlings in a biofloc culture system Involvement of aberrant DNA methylation in the deregulated expression of EHF, LPAR1, MPZL3, and POPDC2 genes in equine sarcoids Influence of early qualitative feed restriction and barrier perch access on some meat quality traits, growth performance, and diet cost analysis in broiler chickens Application of herbal dietary supplements in aquaculture – a review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1