Neurodevelopmental Correlations between the Korean Developmental Screening Test and Bayley Scale III in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Sol Han, Oghyang Kim, Chaeri Yoo, J. Heo, H. Lee, J. Jeon
{"title":"Neurodevelopmental Correlations between the Korean Developmental Screening Test and Bayley Scale III in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants","authors":"Sol Han, Oghyang Kim, Chaeri Yoo, J. Heo, H. Lee, J. Jeon","doi":"10.5385/nm.2020.27.4.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We aimed to analyze the correlations between the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID)-III and Korean Developmental Screening Test (K-DST) in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW; birth weight <1,500 g) preterm infants. Methods: We enrolled 53 VLBW infants (mean gestational age, 28.9±2.11 weeks; mean birth weight, 1,158.5±241.1 g) and assessed them using the BSID-III and K-DST at a corrected age of 18 to 24 months. We analyzed the correlations between the BSID-III and K-DST subdomains and evaluated whether the estimated developmental levels were consistent with the corrected ages. Results: In the BSID-III, the composite scores for cognition, motor, and language were 105.9±13.1 (median, 105; 66th percentile; 95% confidence interval [CI], 98 to 113), 100.9±12.4 (100; 50th percentile; 95% CI, 92 to 108), and 94.9±16.8 (97.5; 34th percentile; 95% CI, 87 to 102), respectively. The scaled scores for receptive/expressive language and gross/fine motor were 9.9±2.9 (10.5)/8.2±2.7 (8) and 9.6±2.4 (9)/10.6 ±2.3 (10), respectively. In the K-DST, the mean scores of cognition (17.8±4.7 [18.5]), language (16.6±7.2 [20]), fine motor (19.4±3.4 [20]), gross motor (19.9±3.8 [21]), sociality (18.6±4.7 [20]), and self-control (17.3±5.1 [18]) were within the range of normal developmental status. Among the overlapping subdomains, cognition (r=0.58, P= 0.003) and language (r=0.86, P<0.001), but not fine and gross motor status (r=0.05, P= 0.79; r=0.16, P=0.44, respectively), showed significant correlation between the BSIDIII and K-DST. Conclusion: The language and cognition domains of the K-DST were significantly correlated with the BSID-III in preterm VLBW infants. Clinicians should consider these discrepancies and correlations when evaluating the developmental status of preterm VLBW infants.","PeriodicalId":32945,"journal":{"name":"Neonatal Medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":"167-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5385/nm.2020.27.4.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to analyze the correlations between the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID)-III and Korean Developmental Screening Test (K-DST) in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW; birth weight <1,500 g) preterm infants. Methods: We enrolled 53 VLBW infants (mean gestational age, 28.9±2.11 weeks; mean birth weight, 1,158.5±241.1 g) and assessed them using the BSID-III and K-DST at a corrected age of 18 to 24 months. We analyzed the correlations between the BSID-III and K-DST subdomains and evaluated whether the estimated developmental levels were consistent with the corrected ages. Results: In the BSID-III, the composite scores for cognition, motor, and language were 105.9±13.1 (median, 105; 66th percentile; 95% confidence interval [CI], 98 to 113), 100.9±12.4 (100; 50th percentile; 95% CI, 92 to 108), and 94.9±16.8 (97.5; 34th percentile; 95% CI, 87 to 102), respectively. The scaled scores for receptive/expressive language and gross/fine motor were 9.9±2.9 (10.5)/8.2±2.7 (8) and 9.6±2.4 (9)/10.6 ±2.3 (10), respectively. In the K-DST, the mean scores of cognition (17.8±4.7 [18.5]), language (16.6±7.2 [20]), fine motor (19.4±3.4 [20]), gross motor (19.9±3.8 [21]), sociality (18.6±4.7 [20]), and self-control (17.3±5.1 [18]) were within the range of normal developmental status. Among the overlapping subdomains, cognition (r=0.58, P= 0.003) and language (r=0.86, P<0.001), but not fine and gross motor status (r=0.05, P= 0.79; r=0.16, P=0.44, respectively), showed significant correlation between the BSIDIII and K-DST. Conclusion: The language and cognition domains of the K-DST were significantly correlated with the BSID-III in preterm VLBW infants. Clinicians should consider these discrepancies and correlations when evaluating the developmental status of preterm VLBW infants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极低出生体重儿韩国发育筛选试验与贝利量表III的神经发育相关性
目的:分析极低出生体重儿(VLBW)的Bayley婴儿发育量表(BSID)-III与韩国发育筛查试验(K-DST)的相关性;出生体重< 1500克)早产儿。方法:入选53例VLBW婴儿(平均胎龄28.9±2.11周;平均出生体重(1,158.5±241.1 g),并在18 ~ 24月龄时使用BSID-III和K-DST进行评估。我们分析了BSID-III和K-DST子域之间的相关性,并评估了估计的发育水平是否与校正的年龄一致。结果:在BSID-III中,认知、运动和语言的综合得分为105.9±13.1分(中位数,105分;第66个百分位;95%置信区间[CI], 98 ~ 113), 100.9±12.4 (100;50百分位;95% CI, 92 ~ 108), 94.9±16.8 (97.5;第34百分比;95% CI, 87 ~ 102)。接受/表达语言和粗/精细运动量表得分分别为9.9±2.9(10.5)分/8.2±2.7(8)分和9.6±2.4(9)分/10.6±2.3(10)分。在K-DST中,认知(17.8±4.7[18.5])、语言(16.6±7.2[20])、精细运动(19.4±3.4[20])、粗大运动(19.9±3.8[21])、社交(18.6±4.7[20])、自我控制(17.3±5.1[18])的平均得分均在正常发育状态的范围内。在重叠的子域中,认知(r=0.58, P= 0.003)和语言(r=0.86, P<0.001),但精细和大运动状态(r=0.05, P= 0.79;r=0.16, P=0.44), BSIDIII与K-DST有显著相关性。结论:学龄前VLBW婴儿K-DST的语言和认知领域与BSID-III有显著相关。临床医生在评估早产儿VLBW发育状态时应考虑这些差异和相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Full-Term Baby with Cerebellar Hemorrhage Referred for Severe Jaundice Occurring within the First 3 Days of Life Should We Consider UGT1A1 Mutation Analysis in Evaluating the Prolonged Jaundice of Newborn Infants? A Case of Oropharyngeal Teratoma Associated with Subluxation of Temporomandibular Joint: A Case Report Does Neonatal Microbiome Research Encompass the Placental Transfer Pathway? Beta Thalassemia Presenting with Neonatal Cholestasis and Extensive Hemosiderosis: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1