Expression in the Virtual Public: Social Justice Considerations in Harvesting Youth Online Discussions for Research Purposes

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Studies in Social Justice Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.26522/SSJ.V15I3.2536
J. Burkell, Priscilla M. Regan
{"title":"Expression in the Virtual Public: Social Justice Considerations in Harvesting Youth Online Discussions for Research Purposes","authors":"J. Burkell, Priscilla M. Regan","doi":"10.26522/SSJ.V15I3.2536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information posted by youth in online social media contexts is regularly accessed, downloaded, integrated, and analyzed by academic researchers. The practice raises significant social justice considerations for researchers including issues of representation and equitable distribution of risks and benefits. Use of this type of data for research purposes helps to ensure representation in research of the voices of (sometimes marginalized) youth who participate in these online contexts, at times discussing issues that are also under-represented. At the same time, youth whose data are harvested are subject (often without notice or consent) to the risks associated with this research, while receiving little if any direct benefit from the work. These risks include the potential loss of online social community as well as threats to participant rights and wellbeing. This paper explores the tension between the social justice benefit of representation and considerations that would suggest caution, the latter including inequitable distribution of research-related costs and benefits, and the traditional ethics concerns of participant autonomy and privacy in the context of youth participation in online discussions. In the final section, we propose guidelines and considerations for the conduct of online social media research to assist researchers to balance and respect representational and participant rights or wellbeing considerations, especially with youth.","PeriodicalId":44923,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Social Justice","volume":"15 1","pages":"397-413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26522/SSJ.V15I3.2536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Information posted by youth in online social media contexts is regularly accessed, downloaded, integrated, and analyzed by academic researchers. The practice raises significant social justice considerations for researchers including issues of representation and equitable distribution of risks and benefits. Use of this type of data for research purposes helps to ensure representation in research of the voices of (sometimes marginalized) youth who participate in these online contexts, at times discussing issues that are also under-represented. At the same time, youth whose data are harvested are subject (often without notice or consent) to the risks associated with this research, while receiving little if any direct benefit from the work. These risks include the potential loss of online social community as well as threats to participant rights and wellbeing. This paper explores the tension between the social justice benefit of representation and considerations that would suggest caution, the latter including inequitable distribution of research-related costs and benefits, and the traditional ethics concerns of participant autonomy and privacy in the context of youth participation in online discussions. In the final section, we propose guidelines and considerations for the conduct of online social media research to assist researchers to balance and respect representational and participant rights or wellbeing considerations, especially with youth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟公共中的表达:为研究目的收集青年在线讨论中的社会正义考虑
青年在网络社交媒体上发布的信息被学术研究人员定期访问、下载、整合和分析。这种做法为研究人员提出了重要的社会正义考虑,包括风险和利益的代表性和公平分配问题。将这类数据用于研究目的,有助于确保参与这些网络环境的青年(有时被边缘化)的声音在研究中得到代表,有时讨论的问题也没有得到充分代表。与此同时,收集数据的年轻人(通常未经通知或同意)面临与这项研究相关的风险,而从这项工作中获得的直接利益几乎没有。这些风险包括可能失去在线社交社区,以及对参与者权利和福祉的威胁。本文探讨了代表的社会正义利益与建议谨慎的考虑之间的紧张关系,后者包括与研究相关的成本和收益的不公平分配,以及青年参与在线讨论背景下参与者自治和隐私的传统伦理问题。在最后一节中,我们提出了在线社交媒体研究的指导方针和注意事项,以帮助研究人员平衡和尊重代表性和参与者的权利或福利考虑,特别是与年轻人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Social Justice
Studies in Social Justice POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Super Visa Program: Immigration Policy Changes and Social Injustice under the Neoliberal Governmentality in Canada Infrastructures of Harm, Communities of Knowledge and Environmental Justice Risky Others: Covid-19 Reconstitutions of Risk, Governance, and Stigmatization of Bodies Landscapes of Injustice, Landscapes of Repair (Editor's Introduction) Collective Memories and Community Interventions: Peace Building in Northern Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1