The Case for Abolishing Historic Building Preservation

Q4 Arts and Humanities Art in Translation Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17561310.2023.2191769
Dieter Hoffmann-Axthelm
{"title":"The Case for Abolishing Historic Building Preservation","authors":"Dieter Hoffmann-Axthelm","doi":"10.1080/17561310.2023.2191769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The essay was initially broadcast in approximately 1979 as a radio feature by a Berlin radio station and subsequently published in 1980 in ARCH+, a magazine for architecture and urbanism that was founded in 1967 by students and faculty of the University of Stuttgart. The essay argues for abolishing any official, municipal, and state-wide politics addressing the preservation and conservation of historical buildings. After briefly surveying the contemporary tendency to list ever more buildings threatened with demolition by urban developments, Hoffmann-Axthelm analyzes the history of preservation in Germany. The loss or disappearance of a clear notion of the historical identity of monuments in the early twentieth century prompted many preservation initiatives later in the century, even for buildings such as workers’ housing, factories and similar, which were not traditionally regarded as monuments. Yet what looks like a success story is, in reality, often the usurpation of preservation efforts by municipal and state-wide politics in conjunction with the construction industry and financial interests, a knot that cannot be untied but only cut by abolishing any official politics of preservation of historic buildings.","PeriodicalId":53629,"journal":{"name":"Art in Translation","volume":"15 1","pages":"137 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art in Translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2023.2191769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The essay was initially broadcast in approximately 1979 as a radio feature by a Berlin radio station and subsequently published in 1980 in ARCH+, a magazine for architecture and urbanism that was founded in 1967 by students and faculty of the University of Stuttgart. The essay argues for abolishing any official, municipal, and state-wide politics addressing the preservation and conservation of historical buildings. After briefly surveying the contemporary tendency to list ever more buildings threatened with demolition by urban developments, Hoffmann-Axthelm analyzes the history of preservation in Germany. The loss or disappearance of a clear notion of the historical identity of monuments in the early twentieth century prompted many preservation initiatives later in the century, even for buildings such as workers’ housing, factories and similar, which were not traditionally regarded as monuments. Yet what looks like a success story is, in reality, often the usurpation of preservation efforts by municipal and state-wide politics in conjunction with the construction industry and financial interests, a knot that cannot be untied but only cut by abolishing any official politics of preservation of historic buildings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
废除历史建筑保护案例
摘要这篇文章最初于1979年左右由柏林一家广播电台作为广播专题节目播出,随后于1980年发表在建筑与城市主义杂志ARCH+上,该杂志由斯图加特大学的学生和教职员工于1967年创办。这篇文章主张废除任何涉及历史建筑保护的官方、市政和全州政治。Hoffmann Axthelm在简要调查了当代越来越多的建筑因城市发展而面临拆除威胁的趋势后,分析了德国的保护历史。20世纪初,对纪念碑历史特征的明确概念的丧失或消失,促使本世纪晚些时候采取了许多保护措施,即使是工人住房、工厂等传统上不被视为纪念碑的建筑。然而,在现实中,看似成功的故事往往是市政和全州政治以及建筑业和金融利益对保护工作的篡夺,这是一个无法解开的结,只有废除任何保护历史建筑的官方政治才能解开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Art in Translation
Art in Translation Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The Prospects or the End of Neo-Dadaism The Black Flowers of Robert Mapplethorpe Roy Lichtenstein Imagination Put on Bread and Water Pollock Exhibition: A Myth Arrives from America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1