The relevance of the concept of potential natural vegetation in the Anthropocene

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI:10.1080/17550874.2021.1984600
I. Somodi, J. Ewald, Ákos Bede‐Fazekas, Z. Molnár
{"title":"The relevance of the concept of potential natural vegetation in the Anthropocene","authors":"I. Somodi, J. Ewald, Ákos Bede‐Fazekas, Z. Molnár","doi":"10.1080/17550874.2021.1984600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background The concept of potential natural vegetation (PNV) refers to self-sustaining mature vegetation matching the environmental conditions a site offers. Despite its widespread use, the applicability of the concept under the current level of human impacts on the environment has been criticised. Aims We re-examine the original publication of the PNV concept and its development over time to identify the sources of tension between theory and application and to direct the discourse onto a common ground of understanding. Our focus is on the relationship between human impacts and PNV. Arguments Based on extended excerpts and detailed interpretation, we affirm that PNV applies to a specific point in time. Consequently, PNV is independent of any realised vegetation including past undisturbed (pre-human) vegetation. We track possible routes and reasons for alternative interpretations. We identify PNV as a mental concept, or a neutral model, that represents baseline vegetation potential that excludes contemporary human management but includes past environment-modifying impacts. We address how a concept reflecting unmanaged vegetation can be important for application in a world transformed by humans. Conclusions Rather than abandoning the concept, we advocate adhering to using it in the original sense of its definition. This way PNV can serve research as a neutral model and support sustainable land use planning.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2021.1984600","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The concept of potential natural vegetation (PNV) refers to self-sustaining mature vegetation matching the environmental conditions a site offers. Despite its widespread use, the applicability of the concept under the current level of human impacts on the environment has been criticised. Aims We re-examine the original publication of the PNV concept and its development over time to identify the sources of tension between theory and application and to direct the discourse onto a common ground of understanding. Our focus is on the relationship between human impacts and PNV. Arguments Based on extended excerpts and detailed interpretation, we affirm that PNV applies to a specific point in time. Consequently, PNV is independent of any realised vegetation including past undisturbed (pre-human) vegetation. We track possible routes and reasons for alternative interpretations. We identify PNV as a mental concept, or a neutral model, that represents baseline vegetation potential that excludes contemporary human management but includes past environment-modifying impacts. We address how a concept reflecting unmanaged vegetation can be important for application in a world transformed by humans. Conclusions Rather than abandoning the concept, we advocate adhering to using it in the original sense of its definition. This way PNV can serve research as a neutral model and support sustainable land use planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
潜在自然植被概念与人类世的相关性
潜在自然植被(PNV)的概念是指与场地提供的环境条件相匹配的自我维持的成熟植被。尽管这一概念被广泛使用,但在目前人类对环境的影响水平下,这一概念的适用性受到了批评。我们重新审视PNV概念的最初发表及其随着时间的发展,以确定理论与应用之间紧张的根源,并将话语引导到一个共同的理解基础上。我们的重点是人类影响与PNV之间的关系。基于扩展的摘录和详细的解释,我们确认PNV适用于特定的时间点。因此,PNV独立于任何已实现的植被,包括过去未受干扰的(前人类)植被。我们跟踪可能的途径和原因的不同解释。我们认为PNV是一个心理概念,或者是一个中性模型,它代表了基线植被潜力,不包括当代人类管理,但包括过去的环境改变影响。我们讨论了一个反映未管理植被的概念如何在人类改变的世界中发挥重要作用。我们主张坚持按照其定义的原始意义来使用它,而不是放弃这个概念。这样一来,PNV就可以作为一个中立的模型为研究提供服务,并支持可持续的土地利用规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1