Strength and Durability of Cement Stabilized Expansive Soil Amended with Sugarcane Press Mud

IF 0.6 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.2478/ceer-2022-0008
J. James, Akilan Gunaselvi Selvam, K. Annamalai, Vishal Marimuthu, Vishnu Varadhan Srinivasan, Sooraj Kolamurugan
{"title":"Strength and Durability of Cement Stabilized Expansive Soil Amended with Sugarcane Press Mud","authors":"J. James, Akilan Gunaselvi Selvam, K. Annamalai, Vishal Marimuthu, Vishnu Varadhan Srinivasan, Sooraj Kolamurugan","doi":"10.2478/ceer-2022-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present investigation delved into the performance of cement stabilized soil amended with sugarcane press mud (PM), an organic waste residue from the sugar industry. An expansive soil was stabilized using 3% and 8% ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and modified with 1%, 3% and 5% PM. Cylindrical samples of dimensions 38 mm diameter and 76 mm height were cast and cured for 7, 14 and 21 days for all combinations considered. After the designated curing periods, the specimens were strained axially until failure to determine the strength of the samples. Samples were also subjected to alternate cycles of wetting and drying and the resistance to loss in weight was determined. The results of the investigation revealed that PM can be considered as a strength accelerator due to enhancement in early strength of the samples at 7 days of curing but beneficial strength gain could not be sustained over extended curing periods considered. However, 1% and 3% PM modified specimens were more resistant to weight loss when compared to pure cement stabilized specimens. Based on the results of the investigation, PM can be considered as a potential auxiliary additive to cement stabilized soil for improving the durability performance of the soil.","PeriodicalId":54121,"journal":{"name":"Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports","volume":"32 1","pages":"138 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ceer-2022-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The present investigation delved into the performance of cement stabilized soil amended with sugarcane press mud (PM), an organic waste residue from the sugar industry. An expansive soil was stabilized using 3% and 8% ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and modified with 1%, 3% and 5% PM. Cylindrical samples of dimensions 38 mm diameter and 76 mm height were cast and cured for 7, 14 and 21 days for all combinations considered. After the designated curing periods, the specimens were strained axially until failure to determine the strength of the samples. Samples were also subjected to alternate cycles of wetting and drying and the resistance to loss in weight was determined. The results of the investigation revealed that PM can be considered as a strength accelerator due to enhancement in early strength of the samples at 7 days of curing but beneficial strength gain could not be sustained over extended curing periods considered. However, 1% and 3% PM modified specimens were more resistant to weight loss when compared to pure cement stabilized specimens. Based on the results of the investigation, PM can be considered as a potential auxiliary additive to cement stabilized soil for improving the durability performance of the soil.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甘蔗压浆改良水泥稳定膨胀土的强度和耐久性
摘要本研究对甘蔗压榨泥(PM)改性水泥稳定土的性能进行了研究。使用3%和8%的普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)稳定膨胀土,并用1%、3%和5%的PM进行改性。对于所有考虑的组合,直径为38mm、高度为76mm的圆柱形样品被铸造并固化7、14和21天。在指定的固化期后,对试样进行轴向应变,直到未能确定试样的强度。还对样品进行交替的润湿和干燥循环,并测定其抗重量损失性。研究结果表明,PM可以被视为强度促进剂,因为在固化7天时样品的早期强度有所提高,但在考虑的延长固化期内,有益的强度增益无法持续。然而,与纯水泥稳定试样相比,1%和3%PM改性试样更能抵抗重量损失。根据研究结果,PM可以被认为是一种潜在的水泥稳定土辅助添加剂,可以提高土壤的耐久性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the Use of Renewable Energy Sources (Res) by Poland and Latvia in the Perspective of the Environmental Objectives Set by the European Union Interlevel Connections as a Way to Increase the Ventilation Efficiency of a Mine Ventilation Network - a Case Study Flexural Buckling Resistance of Stiffeners Reinforcing Wall of a Steel Silo Short- term Influence of Glyphosate on Microorganisms in Backyard Compost Ozonation in Wastewater Disinfection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1