Performance evaluation of HiPIMS, S3p and CAE deposited coatings during dry turning of Dss2205

IF 2.7 4区工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Machining Science and Technology Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1080/10910344.2022.2129981

G. Sonawane, V. Sargade

{"title":"Performance evaluation of HiPIMS, S3p and CAE deposited coatings during dry turning of Dss2205","authors":"G. Sonawane, V. Sargade","doi":"10.1080/10910344.2022.2129981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present study is an extension of our previous work. Performance evaluation of single-layer AlTiN coating deposited by Scalable Pulse Power Plasma (S3p) and High Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering (HiPIMS), with multi-layer TiN/TiAlN and AlTiN/TiAlN coating deposited by Cathodic Arc Evaporation (CAE) is carried out. Taguchi’s full factorial design with L9 orthogonal array was used for machining. AlTiN (S3p) coating exhibited a tool life of 111 min, 1.5 times as much as AlTiN (HiPIMS) coating. Multi-layer coatings could not offer comparable performance with single-layer coatings. Among the multi-layer coatings’ tools having the top layer of Al performed better. Surface roughness exhibited by AlTiN (S3p) tool was 1.2 µm compared to 1.8 µm by AlTiN (HiPIMS) tools. The rate of reduction of cutting force for AlTiN (HiPIMS) and AlTiN (S3p) tools was found to be 5% and 11%, respectively. Multi-layer TiN/TiAlN-coated tool exhibited 2.5 times higher surface roughness compared to single-layer AlTiCrN coated tool. Empirical models showed predictability of 5% and 20% for cutting force and surface roughness respectively. The higher predictability range for surface roughness is due to influence of both cutting speed and feed. The developed models can be used for selection among AlTiN (S3p) and AlTiN (HiPIMS) coated tools.","PeriodicalId":51109,"journal":{"name":"Machining Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machining Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2022.2129981","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract The present study is an extension of our previous work. Performance evaluation of single-layer AlTiN coating deposited by Scalable Pulse Power Plasma (S3p) and High Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering (HiPIMS), with multi-layer TiN/TiAlN and AlTiN/TiAlN coating deposited by Cathodic Arc Evaporation (CAE) is carried out. Taguchi’s full factorial design with L9 orthogonal array was used for machining. AlTiN (S3p) coating exhibited a tool life of 111 min, 1.5 times as much as AlTiN (HiPIMS) coating. Multi-layer coatings could not offer comparable performance with single-layer coatings. Among the multi-layer coatings’ tools having the top layer of Al performed better. Surface roughness exhibited by AlTiN (S3p) tool was 1.2 µm compared to 1.8 µm by AlTiN (HiPIMS) tools. The rate of reduction of cutting force for AlTiN (HiPIMS) and AlTiN (S3p) tools was found to be 5% and 11%, respectively. Multi-layer TiN/TiAlN-coated tool exhibited 2.5 times higher surface roughness compared to single-layer AlTiCrN coated tool. Empirical models showed predictability of 5% and 20% for cutting force and surface roughness respectively. The higher predictability range for surface roughness is due to influence of both cutting speed and feed. The developed models can be used for selection among AlTiN (S3p) and AlTiN (HiPIMS) coated tools.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Dss2205干式车削过程中HiPIMS、S3p和CAE沉积涂层的性能评价

本研究是对以往工作的延伸。对可扩展脉冲功率等离子体(S3p)和高功率脉冲磁控溅射(HiPIMS)沉积的单层AlTiN涂层、多层TiN/TiAlN涂层和阴极电弧蒸发(CAE)沉积的AlTiN/TiAlN涂层进行了性能评价。采用L9正交设计的田口全因子设计进行加工。AlTiN (S3p)涂层的刀具寿命为111分钟，是AlTiN (HiPIMS)涂层的1.5倍。多层涂料的性能无法与单层涂料相比。在多层涂层中，顶层Al涂层的刀具性能较好。AlTiN (S3p)工具显示的表面粗糙度为1.2µm，而AlTiN (HiPIMS)工具显示的表面粗糙度为1.8µm。AlTiN (hiims)和AlTiN (S3p)刀具的切削力降低率分别为5%和11%。多层TiN/ tialn涂层刀具的表面粗糙度是单层AlTiCrN涂层刀具的2.5倍。经验模型显示，切削力和表面粗糙度的可预测性分别为5%和20%。较高的表面粗糙度可预测范围是由于切削速度和进给量的影响。开发的模型可用于选择AlTiN (S3p)和AlTiN (HiPIMS)涂层工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Machining Science and Technology 工程技术-材料科学：综合

CiteScore

5.70

自引率

3.70%

发文量

审稿时长

6 months

期刊介绍： Machining Science and Technology publishes original scientific and technical papers and review articles on topics related to traditional and nontraditional machining processes performed on all materials—metals and advanced alloys, polymers, ceramics, composites, and biomaterials. Topics covered include: -machining performance of all materials, including lightweight materials- coated and special cutting tools: design and machining performance evaluation- predictive models for machining performance and optimization, including machining dynamics- measurement and analysis of machined surfaces- sustainable machining: dry, near-dry, or Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) and cryogenic machining processes precision and micro/nano machining- design and implementation of in-process sensors for monitoring and control of machining performance- surface integrity in machining processes, including detection and characterization of machining damage- new and advanced abrasive machining processes: design and performance analysis- cutting fluids and special coolants/lubricants- nontraditional and hybrid machining processes, including EDM, ECM, laser and plasma-assisted machining, waterjet and abrasive waterjet machining