INEFFECTIVENESS OF THE LAW ON CROSS INSOLVENSI UNCITRAL MODEL

Sefriani
{"title":"INEFFECTIVENESS OF THE LAW ON CROSS INSOLVENSI UNCITRAL MODEL","authors":"Sefriani","doi":"10.20961/YUSTISIA.V0IXX.27858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal problems due to cross border insolvency are increasingly complex. The United Nations has issued the 1997 Model Law on Cross border Insolvency (CBI) to help countries solve their CBI problems. However, this model law is not effective because very few countries adopted it. The legal problem studied is why very few countries adopted the model law and how to overcome the ineffectiveness of the model law. The results of the study indicate that the lack of adoption of the model law caused by: the model law is only a non-binding legislative text; Too much flexibility encourages deviations from the provisions; do not want to reduce their sovereignty, status quo, international cooperation recommended by the model law is not always of primary interest, and many countries have been bound by international agreements on regional CBI which are considered more relevant than the model law.  The solutions that can be suggested to overcome the ineffectiveness of the model law on CBI are national bankruptcy laws mechanism; the International Treaties and Conventions mechanism; Rules, Regulations, Principles and Guidelines mechanisms and protocol or adhoc agreements.Treaties and Conventions; mekanisme Rules, Regulations, Principles and Guidelinesan dan mekanisme pembuatan protocol atau adhoc agreement.Kata kunci: model law; kepailitan lintas batas negara; adopsi ","PeriodicalId":33244,"journal":{"name":"Yustisia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yustisia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/YUSTISIA.V0IXX.27858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Legal problems due to cross border insolvency are increasingly complex. The United Nations has issued the 1997 Model Law on Cross border Insolvency (CBI) to help countries solve their CBI problems. However, this model law is not effective because very few countries adopted it. The legal problem studied is why very few countries adopted the model law and how to overcome the ineffectiveness of the model law. The results of the study indicate that the lack of adoption of the model law caused by: the model law is only a non-binding legislative text; Too much flexibility encourages deviations from the provisions; do not want to reduce their sovereignty, status quo, international cooperation recommended by the model law is not always of primary interest, and many countries have been bound by international agreements on regional CBI which are considered more relevant than the model law.  The solutions that can be suggested to overcome the ineffectiveness of the model law on CBI are national bankruptcy laws mechanism; the International Treaties and Conventions mechanism; Rules, Regulations, Principles and Guidelines mechanisms and protocol or adhoc agreements.Treaties and Conventions; mekanisme Rules, Regulations, Principles and Guidelinesan dan mekanisme pembuatan protocol atau adhoc agreement.Kata kunci: model law; kepailitan lintas batas negara; adopsi 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论交叉破产法律的无效性不文明模式
跨境破产引起的法律问题日益复杂。联合国颁布了1997年《跨境破产示范法》,以帮助各国解决其跨境破产问题。然而,这一示范法并不有效,因为很少有国家采用它。所研究的法律问题是为什么很少国家采用示范法以及如何克服示范法的无效性。研究结果表明,示范法缺乏通过性的原因有:示范法只是一个不具约束力的立法文本;太大的灵活性会鼓励偏离规定;不希望降低其主权,维持现状,示范法所建议的国际合作并不总是首要利益,许多国家已受到区域CBI国际协定的约束,这些协定被认为比示范法更相关。克服《示范法》在国有企业破产问题上的无效性,可以从国家破产法机制入手;国际条约和公约机制;规则、条例、原则和准则、机制和议定书或特设协定。条约和公约;mekanisme规则、条例、原则和指南以及mekanisme协议和临时协议。示范法;kepaailitan lintas batas negara;adopsi
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Postponed Regional Head Elections in Emergency Situations: a Constitutional Democracy Perspective in Indonesia Eliminating the Gap of Labor and Social Protection for the Workers of Platform-Based Transportation A Circular Economy-Based Plastic Waste Management Policy in Indonesia (Compared to China and EU) Enhancing Consumer Protection in the Indonesian Financial Service Sector through the Utilization of Standardized Contracts Inadequate Cryptocurrency and Money Laundering Regulations in Indonesia (Comparative Law of US and Germany)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1