Application of Bi-factor MIRT and Higher-order CDM Models to an In-house EFL Listening Test for Diagnostic Purposes

IF 1.4 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Assessment Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-03-15 DOI:10.1080/15434303.2021.1980571
Shangchao Min, Hongwen Cai, Lianzhen He
{"title":"Application of Bi-factor MIRT and Higher-order CDM Models to an In-house EFL Listening Test for Diagnostic Purposes","authors":"Shangchao Min, Hongwen Cai, Lianzhen He","doi":"10.1080/15434303.2021.1980571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present study examined the performance of the bi-factor multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) model and higher-order (HO) cognitive diagnostic models (CDM) in providing diagnostic information and general ability estimation simultaneously in a listening test. The data used were 1,611 examinees’ item-level responses to an in-house EFL listening test in China and five content experts’ item-attribute coding results of the test form. The bi-factor MIRT model was compared with five CDMs with and without a higher-order structure in terms of model fit, attribute classification and general ability estimation. The results showed that the bi-factor MIRT model provided the best model-data fit, followed by the HO-G-DINA model, the saturated G-DINA model, and other reduced CDMs. The HO-G-DINA model produced attribute classification results more similar to the G-DINA model, whereas the bi-factor MIRT model offered better results in discriminating examinees’ general listening ability. The findings of this study highlighted the feasibility of using the bi-factor MIRT model as an attractive alternative for diagnostic assessment, especially in language assessment where attributes are assumed to be continuous.","PeriodicalId":46873,"journal":{"name":"Language Assessment Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Assessment Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2021.1980571","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The present study examined the performance of the bi-factor multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) model and higher-order (HO) cognitive diagnostic models (CDM) in providing diagnostic information and general ability estimation simultaneously in a listening test. The data used were 1,611 examinees’ item-level responses to an in-house EFL listening test in China and five content experts’ item-attribute coding results of the test form. The bi-factor MIRT model was compared with five CDMs with and without a higher-order structure in terms of model fit, attribute classification and general ability estimation. The results showed that the bi-factor MIRT model provided the best model-data fit, followed by the HO-G-DINA model, the saturated G-DINA model, and other reduced CDMs. The HO-G-DINA model produced attribute classification results more similar to the G-DINA model, whereas the bi-factor MIRT model offered better results in discriminating examinees’ general listening ability. The findings of this study highlighted the feasibility of using the bi-factor MIRT model as an attractive alternative for diagnostic assessment, especially in language assessment where attributes are assumed to be continuous.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双因素MIRT和高阶CDM模型在诊断性英语听力测试中的应用
摘要本研究考察了双因素多维项目反应理论(MIRT)模型和高阶认知诊断模型(CDM)在听力测试中同时提供诊断信息和一般能力估计的性能。使用的数据是1611名考生对国内英语听力测试的项目级回答和5位内容专家对测试表格的项目属性编码结果。在模型拟合、属性分类和一般能力估计方面,比较了双因素MIRT模型与5种不含高阶结构的cdm模型。结果表明,双因子MIRT模型提供了最佳的模型数据拟合,其次是HO-G-DINA模型,饱和G-DINA模型和其他减少的CDMs。HO-G-DINA模型的属性分类结果更接近G-DINA模型,而双因素MIRT模型在区分考生一般听力能力方面效果更好。这项研究的结果强调了使用双因素MIRT模型作为诊断评估的一个有吸引力的替代方案的可行性,特别是在假设属性是连续的语言评估中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Argument-Based Validation in Testing and Assessment The Diagnosis of Writing in a Second or Foreign Language The Role of Gazing Behaviors in Navigating Paired Role-Play Interactional Competence Assessment Tasks Twenty Years of Language Assessment Quarterly: An Interview with LAQ Founder Antony Kunnan Fundamental Considerations in Technology Mediated Language Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1