Removal of Hardware After Syndesmotic Screw Fixation: A Systematic Literature Review

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot and Ankle Specialist Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.1177/1938640016685153
Kempland C. Walley, K. Hofmann, Brian T. Velasco, J. Kwon
{"title":"Removal of Hardware After Syndesmotic Screw Fixation: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Kempland C. Walley, K. Hofmann, Brian T. Velasco, J. Kwon","doi":"10.1177/1938640016685153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. While trans-syndesmotic fixation with metal screws is considered the gold standard in treating syndesmotic injuries, controversy exists regarding the need and timing of postoperative screw removal. Formal recommendations have not been well established in the literature and clinical practice is highly variable in this regard. The purpose of this systematic review is to critically examine the most recent literature regarding syndesmotic screw removal in order to provide surgeons an evidence-based approach to management of these injuries. Methods. The Cochrane Library and PubMed Medline databases were explored using search terms for syndesmosis and screw removal between October 1, 2010 and June 1, 2016. Results. A total of 9 studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 8 retrospective cohort studies) were found that described the outcomes of either retained or removed syndesmotic screws. Overall, there was no difference in functional, clinical or radiographic outcomes in patients who had their syndesmotic screw removed. There was a higher likelihood of recurrent syndesmotic diastasis when screws were removed between 6 and 8 weeks. There was a higher rate of postoperative infections when syndesmotic screws were removed without administering preoperative antibiotics. Conclusion. Removal of syndesmotic screws is advisable mainly in cases of patient complaints related to the other implanted perimalleolar hardware or malreduction of the syndesmosis after at least 8 weeks postoperatively. Broken or loose screws should not be removed routinely unless causing symptoms. Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended on removal. Radiographs should be routinely obtained immediately prior to removal and formal discussions should be had with patients prior to surgery to discuss management options if a broken screw is unexpectedly encountered intraoperatively. Radiographs and/or computed tomography imaging should be obtained after syndesmotic screw removal when indicated for known syndesmotic malreduction. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Systematic review","PeriodicalId":39271,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","volume":"10 1","pages":"252 - 257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1938640016685153","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640016685153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

Background. While trans-syndesmotic fixation with metal screws is considered the gold standard in treating syndesmotic injuries, controversy exists regarding the need and timing of postoperative screw removal. Formal recommendations have not been well established in the literature and clinical practice is highly variable in this regard. The purpose of this systematic review is to critically examine the most recent literature regarding syndesmotic screw removal in order to provide surgeons an evidence-based approach to management of these injuries. Methods. The Cochrane Library and PubMed Medline databases were explored using search terms for syndesmosis and screw removal between October 1, 2010 and June 1, 2016. Results. A total of 9 studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 8 retrospective cohort studies) were found that described the outcomes of either retained or removed syndesmotic screws. Overall, there was no difference in functional, clinical or radiographic outcomes in patients who had their syndesmotic screw removed. There was a higher likelihood of recurrent syndesmotic diastasis when screws were removed between 6 and 8 weeks. There was a higher rate of postoperative infections when syndesmotic screws were removed without administering preoperative antibiotics. Conclusion. Removal of syndesmotic screws is advisable mainly in cases of patient complaints related to the other implanted perimalleolar hardware or malreduction of the syndesmosis after at least 8 weeks postoperatively. Broken or loose screws should not be removed routinely unless causing symptoms. Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended on removal. Radiographs should be routinely obtained immediately prior to removal and formal discussions should be had with patients prior to surgery to discuss management options if a broken screw is unexpectedly encountered intraoperatively. Radiographs and/or computed tomography imaging should be obtained after syndesmotic screw removal when indicated for known syndesmotic malreduction. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Systematic review
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椎间盘联合螺钉固定后内固定物的移除:系统的文献回顾
背景虽然金属螺钉经联合韧带固定被认为是治疗联合韧带损伤的金标准,但对于术后螺钉取出的必要性和时间存在争议。文献中没有很好地确立正式的建议,临床实践在这方面存在很大的差异。本系统综述的目的是批判性地检查关于联合韧带螺钉移除的最新文献,以便为外科医生提供一种基于证据的方法来管理这些损伤。方法。在2010年10月1日至2016年6月1日期间,使用联合韧带和螺钉摘除的搜索词对Cochrane图书馆和PubMed Medline数据库进行了探索。后果共发现9项研究(1项随机对照试验和8项回顾性队列研究)描述了保留或移除联合韧带螺钉的结果。总的来说,移除联合韧带螺钉的患者在功能、临床或放射学结果方面没有差异。当螺钉在6至8周之间取出时,再次出现联合韧带分离的可能性更高。当移除联合韧带螺钉而不给予术前抗生素时,术后感染率较高。结论建议移除联合韧带螺钉,主要是在术后至少8周后,患者抱怨与其他植入的踝周硬件或联合韧带复位不良有关的情况下。除非出现症状,否则不应定期拆除破损或松动的螺钉。建议在取出时进行抗生素预防。应在取出前立即常规获取射线照片,并在手术前与患者进行正式讨论,以讨论在手术中意外遇到螺钉断裂时的管理选择。当已知联合韧带复位不良时,应在联合韧带螺钉移除后进行射线照相和/或计算机断层扫描成像。证据级别:第四级:系统审查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Specialist
Foot and Ankle Specialist Health Professions-Podiatry
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
期刊最新文献
Are SER-II Ankle Fractures Anatomic? Computed Tomography Demonstrates Mortise Malalignment in the Setting of Apparently Normal Radiographs. Sleep Apnea and Postoperative Medical Complications and Health Care Expenditures Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Bimalleolar Ankle Fractures. Utilization of the Modified Lapidus Procedure for Correction of Moderate to Severe Hallux Valgus Deformity With Increased Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle. Modified Bösch Osteotomy Combined With a Percutaneous Adductor Tendon Release for the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity: Learning Curve. Outcomes Following Repeat Ankle Arthroscopy and Microfracture for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1