Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
V. Ficarra, A. Crestani, A. Inferrera, G. Novara, M. Rossanese, E. Subba, G. Giannarini
{"title":"Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies","authors":"V. Ficarra, A. Crestani, A. Inferrera, G. Novara, M. Rossanese, E. Subba, G. Giannarini","doi":"10.3233/KCA-180037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We performed an update of previous reviews of the literature to provide an overview on incidence, predictive factors, management and prognosis of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after partial nephrectomy (PN) including recent surgical series and studies comparing different approaches and techniques. Material and methods: A literature search was performed from January 2013 to January 2018 using the Medline database. The search strategy included a free-text protocol using the term “nephron-sparing surgery” OR “partial nephrectomy” AND “positive surgical margins” across the title and abstract fields of the records. From each selected study, we extracted the following data: number of analyzed patients, study design, approach and surgical technique used, PSMs rate, pathological features, type of PSMs treatment, mean (median) follow-up duration and final patient status. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager software v. 5.2 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Results: We selected a total of 36 (48%) studies. All studies were retrospective and the best statistical method used for comparison was the matched-pair analysis (level 4). Overall, 45,786 patients treated with PN were included in the selected studies. PSMs were reported in a total of 3,093 (6.7%) patients. The mean estimated PSMs rate was 7%, 5% and 4.3% in patients who underwent robot-assisted PN (RAPN), laparoscopic PN (LPN) and open PN (OPN), respectively. Comparative studies showed a significant advantage in favor of OPN compared with minimally invasive approach, while RAPN showed more favourable PSMs risk compared with LPN (odds ratio 3.02, 95% confidence intervals 2.05–4.45). No differences were detected stratifying data according to other surgical or tumor-related factors. Tumor size, nuclear grading and pT3a stage represent the most important predictors of PSMs. In 6,809 patients, follow-up data were available. Only 101 (1.4%) local recurrences and 88 (1.3%) distant recurrences were observed both in PSMs and negative surgical margins subgroups. PSMs were associated with a significant increased risk of local recurrence with a significant impact on local recurrence-free survival and metastasis-free survival. However, a significant impact on cancer-specific and overall survival could not be demonstrated. ∗Correspondence to: Vincenzo Ficarra, MD, FEBU, Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology “Gaetano Barresi”, Urologic section, University of Messina, via Consolare Valeria 1, 98124 Messina, Italy. E-mail: vficarra@unime.it. ISSN 2468-4562/18/$35.00 © 2018 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved This article is published online with Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0). 134 V. Ficarra et al. / Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy Conclusions: Studies published in the last 5 years confirmed that PSMs after PN are a rare condition. Although PSMs increase the risk of local and distant recurrence, their influence on cancer-specific and overall survival seems to be limited. Close surveillance should be strongly recommended as initial treatment of patients with PSMs after PN.","PeriodicalId":17823,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/KCA-180037","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-180037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Objective: We performed an update of previous reviews of the literature to provide an overview on incidence, predictive factors, management and prognosis of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after partial nephrectomy (PN) including recent surgical series and studies comparing different approaches and techniques. Material and methods: A literature search was performed from January 2013 to January 2018 using the Medline database. The search strategy included a free-text protocol using the term “nephron-sparing surgery” OR “partial nephrectomy” AND “positive surgical margins” across the title and abstract fields of the records. From each selected study, we extracted the following data: number of analyzed patients, study design, approach and surgical technique used, PSMs rate, pathological features, type of PSMs treatment, mean (median) follow-up duration and final patient status. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager software v. 5.2 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Results: We selected a total of 36 (48%) studies. All studies were retrospective and the best statistical method used for comparison was the matched-pair analysis (level 4). Overall, 45,786 patients treated with PN were included in the selected studies. PSMs were reported in a total of 3,093 (6.7%) patients. The mean estimated PSMs rate was 7%, 5% and 4.3% in patients who underwent robot-assisted PN (RAPN), laparoscopic PN (LPN) and open PN (OPN), respectively. Comparative studies showed a significant advantage in favor of OPN compared with minimally invasive approach, while RAPN showed more favourable PSMs risk compared with LPN (odds ratio 3.02, 95% confidence intervals 2.05–4.45). No differences were detected stratifying data according to other surgical or tumor-related factors. Tumor size, nuclear grading and pT3a stage represent the most important predictors of PSMs. In 6,809 patients, follow-up data were available. Only 101 (1.4%) local recurrences and 88 (1.3%) distant recurrences were observed both in PSMs and negative surgical margins subgroups. PSMs were associated with a significant increased risk of local recurrence with a significant impact on local recurrence-free survival and metastasis-free survival. However, a significant impact on cancer-specific and overall survival could not be demonstrated. ∗Correspondence to: Vincenzo Ficarra, MD, FEBU, Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology “Gaetano Barresi”, Urologic section, University of Messina, via Consolare Valeria 1, 98124 Messina, Italy. E-mail: vficarra@unime.it. ISSN 2468-4562/18/$35.00 © 2018 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved This article is published online with Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0). 134 V. Ficarra et al. / Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy Conclusions: Studies published in the last 5 years confirmed that PSMs after PN are a rare condition. Although PSMs increase the risk of local and distant recurrence, their influence on cancer-specific and overall survival seems to be limited. Close surveillance should be strongly recommended as initial treatment of patients with PSMs after PN.
肾部分切除术后手术切缘阳性:比较研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:我们对先前的文献综述进行了更新,以概述部分肾切除术(PN)后阳性手术切缘(psm)的发生率、预测因素、管理和预后,包括最近的手术系列和比较不同方法和技术的研究。材料和方法:使用Medline数据库检索2013年1月至2018年1月的文献。搜索策略包括一个自由文本协议,在记录的标题和摘要字段中使用术语“保留肾元手术”或“部分肾切除术”和“阳性手术切缘”。从每一项选定的研究中,我们提取了以下数据:分析的患者人数、研究设计、采用的入路和手术技术、psm发生率、病理特征、psm治疗类型、平均(中位)随访时间和最终患者状态。meta分析使用Review Manager软件v. 5.2 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK)进行。结果:我们共选择了36项(48%)研究。所有的研究都是回顾性的,用于比较的最佳统计方法是配对分析(4级)。总的来说,45,786例接受PN治疗的患者被纳入选定的研究。共有3093例(6.7%)患者报告了psm。在接受机器人辅助PN (RAPN)、腹腔镜PN (LPN)和开放式PN (OPN)的患者中,平均估计pms率分别为7%、5%和4.3%。比较研究显示,与微创入路相比,OPN具有显著优势,而RAPN相比LPN具有更有利的psm风险(优势比3.02,95%可信区间2.05-4.45)。根据其他手术或肿瘤相关因素的分层数据没有发现差异。肿瘤大小、核分级和pT3a分期是psm最重要的预测指标。在6809例患者中,有随访数据。在psm和阴性手术切缘亚组中,仅观察到101例(1.4%)局部复发和88例(1.3%)远处复发。psm与局部复发风险显著增加相关,对局部无复发生存期和无转移生存期有显著影响。然而,对癌症特异性和总体生存率的显著影响尚未得到证实。*通讯:Vincenzo Ficarra,医学博士,FEBU,人类和儿科病理学系“Gaetano Barresi”,泌尿科,墨西拿大学,通过Consolare Valeria 1988124墨西拿,意大利。电子邮件:vficarra@unime.it。ISSN 2468-4562/18/$35.00©2018 - IOS出版社及作者。本文以开放获取方式在线发布,并根据知识共享署名非商业许可协议(CC BY-NC 4.0)发布。134 V。结论:近5年发表的研究证实,PN后psm是一种罕见的疾病。尽管psm增加了局部和远处复发的风险,但它们对癌症特异性和总体生存的影响似乎有限。强烈建议将密切监测作为PN后psm患者的初始治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。