Inspecting map compilation in earth sciences for better communication

IF 1.4 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Hungarian Geographical Bulletin Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI:10.15201/hungeobull.70.3.5
Márton Pál, Gáspár Albert
{"title":"Inspecting map compilation in earth sciences for better communication","authors":"Márton Pál, Gáspár Albert","doi":"10.15201/hungeobull.70.3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of thematic cartography in earth sciences is a frequent task for researchers when publishing. When creating a map, researchers intend to communicate important spatial information that enhances, supplements or replaces textual content. Not only visual but substantial requirements exist for those who create maps. Cartographic visualisation has several well-established rules that must be taken into account during compilation, but not all researchers apply them correctly. The present study aims to identify the factors determining the quality of geoscientific maps and what needs to be improved during a map compilation process. To get to know the tendencies, we have investigated maps in designated journals – one Hungarian and one international per earth science branch: geography, cartography, geology, geophysics, and meteorology. A system of criteria was set up for evaluating the maps objectively; basic rules of cartography, quality of visual representation, and copyright rules were investigated. The results show that better map quality is connected to journals with strict editorial rules and higher impact factors. This assessment method is suitable for analysing any kind of spatial visual representation, and individual map-composing authors can use it for evaluating their maps before submission and publication.","PeriodicalId":38149,"journal":{"name":"Hungarian Geographical Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hungarian Geographical Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.70.3.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The use of thematic cartography in earth sciences is a frequent task for researchers when publishing. When creating a map, researchers intend to communicate important spatial information that enhances, supplements or replaces textual content. Not only visual but substantial requirements exist for those who create maps. Cartographic visualisation has several well-established rules that must be taken into account during compilation, but not all researchers apply them correctly. The present study aims to identify the factors determining the quality of geoscientific maps and what needs to be improved during a map compilation process. To get to know the tendencies, we have investigated maps in designated journals – one Hungarian and one international per earth science branch: geography, cartography, geology, geophysics, and meteorology. A system of criteria was set up for evaluating the maps objectively; basic rules of cartography, quality of visual representation, and copyright rules were investigated. The results show that better map quality is connected to journals with strict editorial rules and higher impact factors. This assessment method is suitable for analysing any kind of spatial visual representation, and individual map-composing authors can use it for evaluating their maps before submission and publication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检查地球科学的地图编制,以便更好地交流
在地球科学中使用专题制图是研究人员在发表时经常要做的工作。在绘制地图时,研究人员希望传达重要的空间信息,以增强、补充或取代文本内容。对于那些创建地图的人来说,不仅有视觉上的要求,还有实质性的要求。地图可视化有几个公认的规则,在编制过程中必须考虑到这些规则,但并不是所有的研究人员都正确地应用它们。本研究旨在确定影响地学地图质量的因素,以及在地图编制过程中需要改进的地方。为了了解这种趋势,我们调查了指定期刊上的地图——一个匈牙利期刊和一个国际期刊,每个地球科学分支:地理学、地图学、地质学、地球物理学和气象学。建立了客观评价地图的标准体系;研究了制图的基本规则、视觉表现质量和版权规则。结果表明,较好的地图质量与编辑规则严格、影响因子较高的期刊有关。该评价方法适用于分析任何类型的空间视觉表现形式,并可用于独立的地图编写者在提交和出版前对其地图进行评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hungarian Geographical Bulletin
Hungarian Geographical Bulletin Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pánek, J. (ed.): Geoparticipatory Spatial Tools Green capital East of the Leitha? The chances and disadvantages of major cities in the Pannonian Basin to win the European Green Capital Award Spatial and temporal analysis of drought-related climate indices for Hungary for 1971–2100 Comparative characteristics of the meadow soils of the Crimean mountain plateaus From geopolitical fault-line to frontline city: changing attitudes to memory politics in Kharkiv under the Russo-Ukrainian war
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1