Were the Ethiopians in Jerusalem Ottoman Citizens? Ethiopian Essentialism versus Ottomanism (1850–1916)

Q3 Arts and Humanities Northeast African Studies Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI:10.14321/nortafristud.20.1-2.0001
S. Ancel
{"title":"Were the Ethiopians in Jerusalem Ottoman Citizens? Ethiopian Essentialism versus Ottomanism (1850–1916)","authors":"S. Ancel","doi":"10.14321/nortafristud.20.1-2.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Between 1850 and 1903 Europeans and Ottomans were in conflict regarding the status of Ethiopians living in Jerusalem. According to the Ottomans, Ethiopians in Jerusalem were Ottoman subjects. European powers like Great Britain, France, and Italy contested this opinion. According to them, Ethiopians in Jerusalem were not subjects of the Ottoman Empire but of the Ethiopian kingdom and as such they held an Ethiopian identity, not an Ottoman one. We will see that the first issue at stake here was the European protection of Ethiopians in Jerusalem. But we will show that the discourse proposed by Ethiopians to their interlocutors in Jerusalem concerning what is supposed to be the Ethiopian identity played an important role. In order to reach their goals in Jerusalem, Ethiopians played the game of Europeans while avoiding directly confronting Ottoman authorities. But in supporting the point of view of the Europeans, Ethiopians developed Ethiopian essentialism, solely centered on the Christian characteristics of Ethiopian identity. Between 1904 and 1916, this essentialism came into conflict with the new social reality of the Ethiopian kingdom.","PeriodicalId":35635,"journal":{"name":"Northeast African Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"1 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northeast African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/nortafristud.20.1-2.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Between 1850 and 1903 Europeans and Ottomans were in conflict regarding the status of Ethiopians living in Jerusalem. According to the Ottomans, Ethiopians in Jerusalem were Ottoman subjects. European powers like Great Britain, France, and Italy contested this opinion. According to them, Ethiopians in Jerusalem were not subjects of the Ottoman Empire but of the Ethiopian kingdom and as such they held an Ethiopian identity, not an Ottoman one. We will see that the first issue at stake here was the European protection of Ethiopians in Jerusalem. But we will show that the discourse proposed by Ethiopians to their interlocutors in Jerusalem concerning what is supposed to be the Ethiopian identity played an important role. In order to reach their goals in Jerusalem, Ethiopians played the game of Europeans while avoiding directly confronting Ottoman authorities. But in supporting the point of view of the Europeans, Ethiopians developed Ethiopian essentialism, solely centered on the Christian characteristics of Ethiopian identity. Between 1904 and 1916, this essentialism came into conflict with the new social reality of the Ethiopian kingdom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耶路撒冷的埃塞俄比亚人是奥斯曼帝国公民吗?埃塞俄比亚本质主义与奥斯曼主义(1850–1916)
摘要:1850年至1903年间,欧洲人和奥斯曼人就居住在耶路撒冷的埃塞俄比亚人的地位问题发生了冲突。根据奥斯曼人的说法,耶路撒冷的埃塞俄比亚人是奥斯曼帝国的臣民。英国、法国和意大利等欧洲大国对这一观点提出了质疑。据他们说,耶路撒冷的埃塞俄比亚人不是奥斯曼帝国的臣民,而是埃塞俄比亚王国的臣民,因此他们持有埃塞俄比亚身份,而不是奥斯曼身份。我们将看到,这里的首要问题是欧洲对耶路撒冷埃塞俄比亚人的保护。但我们将表明,埃塞俄比亚人向耶路撒冷的对话者提出的关于埃塞俄比亚身份的讨论发挥了重要作用。为了在耶路撒冷实现他们的目标,埃塞俄比亚人玩起了欧洲人的游戏,同时避免与奥斯曼当局直接对抗。但在支持欧洲人的观点时,埃塞俄比亚人发展了埃塞俄比亚本质主义,仅以埃塞俄比亚身份的基督教特征为中心。1904年至1916年间,这种本质主义与埃塞俄比亚王国的新社会现实发生了冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Northeast African Studies
Northeast African Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Quest for Self-Determination and the State in Ethiopia: The Oromo Popular Uprising of 2014–2017 in Historical Perspective Race, Gender, and Pageantry: The Ups and Downs of an African American Woman in Imperial Ethiopia Dr. Abebe Ambatchew (1934–2022) National Integration through Political Marginalization: Contradictions of Nation-Building in Ethiopia The Past of Ethiopia's Present: Unfolding Crises, Cyclical Violence, and Competing Nationalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1