Teamwork doubting and doubting teamwork

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Improving Schools Pub Date : 2018-08-03 DOI:10.1177/1365480218791908
Pascale Benoliel, Chen Schechter
{"title":"Teamwork doubting and doubting teamwork","authors":"Pascale Benoliel, Chen Schechter","doi":"10.1177/1365480218791908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teams of teachers and administrators have become more and more common as a framework for improving responsiveness to the ever more dynamic educational environment. Although teamwork is often expected to broaden the team’s collective knowledge base, consequently improving team effectiveness, research shows that this potential effectiveness is not always reached. The article seeks to explore the concept of collective doubting – the inquiry into routine and habitual perceptions and assumptions – and its importance to the teamwork processes, a topic that has been vastly under-investigated in the educational context. Specifically, we propose that collective doubting in the teamwork process has a dynamic nature, and that the doubting process should be carefully considered in the context of different stages in team development. Our goal is to increase both theoretical and practical knowledge about the process of collective doubt in such a way as to facilitate team effectiveness. We further seek to delineate the internal and external activities in which principals can engage to promote a constructive doubting process in the team context. Implications for principals, as well as for further avenues of research, are suggested.","PeriodicalId":45995,"journal":{"name":"Improving Schools","volume":"21 1","pages":"225 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1365480218791908","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Improving Schools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480218791908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Teams of teachers and administrators have become more and more common as a framework for improving responsiveness to the ever more dynamic educational environment. Although teamwork is often expected to broaden the team’s collective knowledge base, consequently improving team effectiveness, research shows that this potential effectiveness is not always reached. The article seeks to explore the concept of collective doubting – the inquiry into routine and habitual perceptions and assumptions – and its importance to the teamwork processes, a topic that has been vastly under-investigated in the educational context. Specifically, we propose that collective doubting in the teamwork process has a dynamic nature, and that the doubting process should be carefully considered in the context of different stages in team development. Our goal is to increase both theoretical and practical knowledge about the process of collective doubt in such a way as to facilitate team effectiveness. We further seek to delineate the internal and external activities in which principals can engage to promote a constructive doubting process in the team context. Implications for principals, as well as for further avenues of research, are suggested.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
团队合作,质疑团队合作
教师和管理人员团队作为提高对日益动态的教育环境的响应能力的框架,变得越来越普遍。尽管团队合作通常被期望扩大团队的集体知识库,从而提高团队的有效性,但研究表明,这种潜在的有效性并不总是能达到的。这篇文章试图探讨集体怀疑的概念——对日常和习惯性认知和假设的探究——及其对团队合作过程的重要性,这是一个在教育背景下研究不足的话题。具体而言,我们提出团队合作过程中的集体怀疑具有动态性质,应在团队发展的不同阶段仔细考虑怀疑过程。我们的目标是增加关于集体怀疑过程的理论和实践知识,以促进团队的有效性。我们进一步寻求描述校长可以参与的内部和外部活动,以促进团队背景下的建设性怀疑过程。提出了对校长以及进一步研究途径的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Improving Schools
Improving Schools EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Improving Schools is for all those engaged in school development, whether improving schools in difficulty or making successful schools even better. The journal includes contributions from across the world with an increasingly international readership including teachers, heads, academics, education authority staff, inspectors and consultants. Improving Schools has created a forum for the exchange of ideas and experiences. Major national policies and initiatives have been evaluated, to share good practice and to highlight problems. The journal also reports on visits to successful schools in diverse contexts, and includes book reviews on a wide range of developmental issues.
期刊最新文献
Integrating pro-environmental behaviors into school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports for creating green schools Teachers’ digital pedagogies and experiences in virtual classrooms Translating sophisticated data analytic strategies regarding school attendance and absenteeism into targeted educational policy Editorial Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1