Central Bank Policy Impacts on the Distribution of State Prices for Future Interest Rates, 2003–2022

Douglas T. Breeden, R. Litzenberger
{"title":"Central Bank Policy Impacts on the Distribution of State Prices for Future Interest Rates, 2003–2022","authors":"Douglas T. Breeden, R. Litzenberger","doi":"10.3905/jfi.2022.1.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we extend the 1978 Breeden–Litzenberger method of extracting state prices from option prices, showing how portfolios of butterfly spreads can be combined with right and left tail spreads to nonparametrically extract discrete state prices from option prices. We derive how those state prices should be biased estimates of true, objective probabilities. For interest rate options, we show that the biases can vary predictably over time (sometimes too high, sometimes too low), as the correlation of interest rates with consumption and wealth has changed signs over time. Consumption betas and proper risk premiums on bonds and of their state prices are at times predictably positive and at times predictably negative. We apply our technique to provide a brief 20-year history of central bank intervention impacts in the US, UK, and Eurozone from 2003 to 2022. Movements in state prices are quite large in the Financial Panic of 2008–2009, as well as in the European Sovereign Debt Crisis of 2010–2013, with Brexit and the Trump elections in 2016, and with the coronavirus pandemic in 2020–2021. Tapering in 2013 and 2022 and liftoffs in rates in 2015 and 2022 were shown to strongly shift state price distributions back toward the symmetry of 2003–2007. We show that central banks dramatically impacted entire state price distributions, not just levels of rates.","PeriodicalId":53711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fixed Income","volume":"32 1","pages":"64 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fixed Income","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfi.2022.1.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we extend the 1978 Breeden–Litzenberger method of extracting state prices from option prices, showing how portfolios of butterfly spreads can be combined with right and left tail spreads to nonparametrically extract discrete state prices from option prices. We derive how those state prices should be biased estimates of true, objective probabilities. For interest rate options, we show that the biases can vary predictably over time (sometimes too high, sometimes too low), as the correlation of interest rates with consumption and wealth has changed signs over time. Consumption betas and proper risk premiums on bonds and of their state prices are at times predictably positive and at times predictably negative. We apply our technique to provide a brief 20-year history of central bank intervention impacts in the US, UK, and Eurozone from 2003 to 2022. Movements in state prices are quite large in the Financial Panic of 2008–2009, as well as in the European Sovereign Debt Crisis of 2010–2013, with Brexit and the Trump elections in 2016, and with the coronavirus pandemic in 2020–2021. Tapering in 2013 and 2022 and liftoffs in rates in 2015 and 2022 were shown to strongly shift state price distributions back toward the symmetry of 2003–2007. We show that central banks dramatically impacted entire state price distributions, not just levels of rates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2003-2022年中央银行政策对未来利率国家价格分布的影响
在本文中,我们扩展了1978年从期权价格中提取状态价格的Breeden-Litzenberger方法,展示了如何将蝴蝶价差组合与左右尾价差结合起来,从期权价格中非参数地提取离散状态价格。我们推导出这些国家价格应该是真实、客观概率的有偏差估计。对于利率期权,我们表明,随着时间的推移,偏差可以预测地变化(有时过高,有时过低),因为利率与消费和财富的相关性随着时间的推移发生了变化。债券的消费贝塔值和适当的风险溢价及其国家价格有时可以预见为正,有时可以预见为负。我们运用我们的技术提供了从2003年到2022年美国、英国和欧元区中央银行干预影响的简短20年历史。在2008-2009年的金融恐慌、2010-2013年的欧洲主权债务危机、2016年的英国脱欧和特朗普大选,以及2020-2021年的冠状病毒大流行期间,国家价格的波动都相当大。2013年和2022年的缩减,以及2015年和2022年的加息,都有力地将各州的价格分布拉回了2003-2007年的对称状态。我们表明,央行极大地影响了整个州的价格分布,而不仅仅是利率水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fixed Income
Journal of Fixed Income Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fixed Income (JFI) provides sophisticated analytical research and case studies on bond instruments of all types – investment grade, high-yield, municipals, ABSs and MBSs, and structured products like CDOs and credit derivatives. Industry experts offer detailed models and analysis on fixed income structuring, performance tracking, and risk management. JFI keeps you on the front line of fixed income practices by: •Staying current on the cutting edge of fixed income markets •Managing your bond portfolios more efficiently •Evaluating interest rate strategies and manage interest rate risk •Gaining insights into the risk profile of structured products.
期刊最新文献
How Making Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities Portable May Impact Housing and Mortgage-Backed Securities Investors Gradient Boosting Model for Corporate Default Integrating Multiple Signals in Systematic Corporate Bond Selection Strategies Bond Duration and Convexity under Stochastic Interest Rates and Credit Spreads Is Bloomberg’s Credit Default Swaps Model Superior in Predicting Defaults?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1