Amah Activism: Domestic Servants and Decolonization in 1960s Malaysia and Singapore

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY International Labor and Working-Class History Pub Date : 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1017/S014754792300008X
C. Twomey
{"title":"Amah Activism: Domestic Servants and Decolonization in 1960s Malaysia and Singapore","authors":"C. Twomey","doi":"10.1017/S014754792300008X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The privatized nature of employment as a domestic servant is often inimical to collective action. Yet in the early 1960s there was significant trade union interest in the working conditions of female domestic servants in Singapore and Malaya. Studies of female domestic service in Malaya (later Malaysia) and Singapore are dominated by work focusing on Chinese-born servants before the Second World War, and migrant maids associated with economic transformation from the late 1970s. If scholarship on pre-war domestic servants leans toward an emphasis on agency, then studies of maids from the 1980s tend toward experiences of abjection. What of the intervening period, during the Cold War, when rapid decolonization introduced new factors into the demography, structure, and regulation of domestic service in Malaysia and Singapore? Did this provide opportunity for greater autonomy, mimic older colonial relationships, or herald new protections for domestic servants in the modern postcolonial state? The considerable historical literature devoted to the relationship between imperial power, colonialism, and domestic service rarely extends to the persistence and dynamics of domestic service in the era of decolonization between the 1950s and the 1970s, although it does explore the increasing feminization of the occupation. This article explores a confluence of factors—the politics of anticolonialism, economic dependence, and apprehension about the privacy of the home—that cohered in a controversy in the 1960s known as the “amah strike,” when female domestic servants in Singapore and Malaya threatened to walk off the job over a proposed change to their employment conditions.","PeriodicalId":14353,"journal":{"name":"International Labor and Working-Class History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Labor and Working-Class History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S014754792300008X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The privatized nature of employment as a domestic servant is often inimical to collective action. Yet in the early 1960s there was significant trade union interest in the working conditions of female domestic servants in Singapore and Malaya. Studies of female domestic service in Malaya (later Malaysia) and Singapore are dominated by work focusing on Chinese-born servants before the Second World War, and migrant maids associated with economic transformation from the late 1970s. If scholarship on pre-war domestic servants leans toward an emphasis on agency, then studies of maids from the 1980s tend toward experiences of abjection. What of the intervening period, during the Cold War, when rapid decolonization introduced new factors into the demography, structure, and regulation of domestic service in Malaysia and Singapore? Did this provide opportunity for greater autonomy, mimic older colonial relationships, or herald new protections for domestic servants in the modern postcolonial state? The considerable historical literature devoted to the relationship between imperial power, colonialism, and domestic service rarely extends to the persistence and dynamics of domestic service in the era of decolonization between the 1950s and the 1970s, although it does explore the increasing feminization of the occupation. This article explores a confluence of factors—the politics of anticolonialism, economic dependence, and apprehension about the privacy of the home—that cohered in a controversy in the 1960s known as the “amah strike,” when female domestic servants in Singapore and Malaya threatened to walk off the job over a proposed change to their employment conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿马激进主义:20世纪60年代马来西亚和新加坡的家仆与非殖民化
家仆就业的私营化性质往往不利于集体行动。然而,在20世纪60年代初,工会对新加坡和马来亚女性家庭佣人的工作条件很感兴趣。马来亚(后来的马来西亚)和新加坡的女性家政服务研究主要集中在第二次世界大战之前的中国出生的仆人,以及与20世纪70年代末经济转型相关的移民女佣。如果说关于战前家庭佣人的研究倾向于强调能动性,那么关于20世纪80年代女佣的研究则倾向于强调被遗弃的经历。冷战期间,迅速的非殖民化给马来西亚和新加坡的人口、结构和家政服务的管理带来了新的因素。这是否为更大的自治权提供了机会,模仿了旧的殖民关系,还是预示着现代后殖民国家对家仆的新保护?大量致力于帝国权力、殖民主义和家政服务之间关系的历史文献很少延伸到20世纪50年代至70年代非殖民化时期家政服务的持续存在和动态,尽管它确实探讨了该职业日益女性化的问题。这篇文章探讨了反殖民主义政治、经济依赖和对家庭隐私的担忧等因素的融合,这些因素在20世纪60年代被称为“阿妈罢工”的争议中凝聚在一起,当时新加坡和马来亚的女佣人威胁要罢工,以反对改变她们的雇佣条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: ILWCH has an international reputation for scholarly innovation and quality. It explores diverse topics from globalisation and workers’ rights to class and consumption, labour movements, class identities and cultures, unions, and working-class politics. ILWCH publishes original research, review essays, conference reports from around the world, and an acclaimed scholarly controversy section. Comparative and cross-disciplinary, the journal is of interest to scholars in history, sociology, political science, labor studies, global studies, and a wide range of other fields and disciplines. Published for International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc.
期刊最新文献
The Worlds of Labor in Ghana’s Gold Mining Industry, c. 1895–1957 Pacifying the Battlefield of Industry: Warfare and Social Rights in 1848 France Gender and Deindustrialization: A Transnational Historiographical Review Japan’s Forgotten Korean Forced Laborers: The Search for Hidden Wartime Graves in Hokkaido Team–Work: The Olympics 1925 and 1931
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1