Limitations in the evidential basis supporting health benefits from a decreased exposure to pesticides through organic food consumption

IF 3.6 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Current Opinion in Toxicology Pub Date : 2020-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cotox.2019.11.003
Robin Mesnage , Ioannis N. Tsakiris , Michael N. Antoniou , Aristides Tsatsakis
{"title":"Limitations in the evidential basis supporting health benefits from a decreased exposure to pesticides through organic food consumption","authors":"Robin Mesnage ,&nbsp;Ioannis N. Tsakiris ,&nbsp;Michael N. Antoniou ,&nbsp;Aristides Tsatsakis","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2019.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Consumer demand for organic food is mostly based on the belief that organic products are healthier because they are less contaminated with pesticides. We explain why health benefits from a decreased exposure to pesticides through organic food consumption remain unsubstantiated. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that nonorganic food products contain higher levels of synthetic pesticides. However, a link between the consumption of an organic diet with health benefits is confounded by a number of lifestyle and demographic covariates. We recommend dietary intervention studies be conducted such as randomized double-blind placebo-controlled investigations to determine if a group of individuals consuming an organic wholefood diet or an equivalent nonorganic diet present any differences in health status.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37736,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 50-55"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cotox.2019.11.003","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202019300919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Consumer demand for organic food is mostly based on the belief that organic products are healthier because they are less contaminated with pesticides. We explain why health benefits from a decreased exposure to pesticides through organic food consumption remain unsubstantiated. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that nonorganic food products contain higher levels of synthetic pesticides. However, a link between the consumption of an organic diet with health benefits is confounded by a number of lifestyle and demographic covariates. We recommend dietary intervention studies be conducted such as randomized double-blind placebo-controlled investigations to determine if a group of individuals consuming an organic wholefood diet or an equivalent nonorganic diet present any differences in health status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持通过食用有机食品减少接触农药对健康有益的证据基础存在局限性
消费者对有机食品的需求主要是基于这样一种信念,即有机产品更健康,因为它们受农药污染较少。我们解释了为什么通过食用有机食品减少接触农药对健康的好处仍然没有得到证实。有足够的证据表明,非有机食品含有较高水平的合成农药。然而,有机饮食与健康益处之间的联系被许多生活方式和人口统计协变量所混淆。我们建议进行饮食干预研究,如随机双盲安慰剂对照调查,以确定一组食用有机全食饮食或同等非有机饮食的人在健康状况上是否存在任何差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Toxicology
Current Opinion in Toxicology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Toxicology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The aims and scope of Current Opinion in Toxicology is to systematically provide the reader with timely and provocative views and opinions of the highest qualified and recognized experts on current advances in selected topics within the field of toxicology. The goal is that Current Opinion in Toxicology will be an invaluable source of information and perspective for researchers, teachers, managers and administrators, policy makers and students. Division of the subject into sections: For this purpose, the scope of Toxicology is divided into six selected high impact themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year: Mechanistic Toxicology, Metabolic Toxicology, Risk assessment in Toxicology, Genomic Toxicology, Systems Toxicology, Translational Toxicology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Mixture toxicity: A hot topic in toxicology and chemical risk assessment Editorial: Guardians of Tomorrow: Developmental Toxicology for Future Generations Editorial: Role of the microbiome in toxicology How single-cell transcriptomics provides insight on hepatic responses to TCDD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1