The paradox of pluralism: A key to interpreting the online public sphere in the time of ‘encastellation’

G. Giacomini
{"title":"The paradox of pluralism: A key to interpreting the online public sphere in the time of ‘encastellation’","authors":"G. Giacomini","doi":"10.1386/cjcs_00043_7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This viewpoint makes a theoretical effort to label the organization of the virtual sphere under new concepts: ‘encastellation’ and the ‘paradox of pluralism’. The former is a metaphorical synthesis of already-known concepts (selective exposure, polarization,\nhomophily, echo chambers and filter bubbles). In the second case, we emphasize the existence of a ‘paradox of online pluralism’: the internet has increased the possibility for everyone to make their voice heard (in quantitative terms), but at the same time it appears to\nalso be increasing the distance between voices, putting in jeopardy the achievement of the aims of the pluralist political system (in qualitative terms). In conclusion, we express doubts about the feasibility of the deliberative vision of democracy in the current virtual sphere.","PeriodicalId":53977,"journal":{"name":"Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"141-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00043_7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This viewpoint makes a theoretical effort to label the organization of the virtual sphere under new concepts: ‘encastellation’ and the ‘paradox of pluralism’. The former is a metaphorical synthesis of already-known concepts (selective exposure, polarization, homophily, echo chambers and filter bubbles). In the second case, we emphasize the existence of a ‘paradox of online pluralism’: the internet has increased the possibility for everyone to make their voice heard (in quantitative terms), but at the same time it appears to also be increasing the distance between voices, putting in jeopardy the achievement of the aims of the pluralist political system (in qualitative terms). In conclusion, we express doubts about the feasibility of the deliberative vision of democracy in the current virtual sphere.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多元主义的悖论:解读“包围”时代网络公共领域的关键
这一观点从理论上努力给虚拟领域的组织贴上新的概念标签:“封套”和“多元主义悖论”。前者是对已知概念(选择性曝光、极化、同质性、回声室和过滤气泡)的隐喻性综合。在第二种情况下,我们强调了“网络多元主义悖论”的存在:互联网增加了每个人发出自己声音的可能性(从数量上讲),但同时它似乎也增加了声音之间的距离,危及多元政治体系目标的实现(从质量上讲)。最后,我们对目前虚拟领域中民主的协商愿景的可行性表示怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Quality journalism and advocacy in raising climate awareness: The case of The Guardian Social inequalities in the making sense of climate change narratives Analysis of climate denialism on YouTube: Refuting instead of debating El bucle invisible (The Invisible Loop), Remedios Zafra (2022) The pluriverse of the Anthropocene: One Earth, many worlds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1