‘Put South Africans First’: Making Sense of an Emerging South African Xenophobic (Online) Community

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Journal of Southern African Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/03057070.2023.2170126
Bastien Dratwa
{"title":"‘Put South Africans First’: Making Sense of an Emerging South African Xenophobic (Online) Community","authors":"Bastien Dratwa","doi":"10.1080/03057070.2023.2170126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the arrival of the Covid-19 pandemic in South Africa, a shift has taken place in the organisation of xenophobia as xenophobic activism has adapted to the pandemic and increasingly moved ‘online’. While a large scholarship on the various aspects of ‘offline’ xenophobia in contemporary South Africa has been produced, the recent intensification of online xenophobic activism during the pandemic remains an under-researched topic. The present study sets out to challenge this lack of attention given to online xenophobia in South Africa by conducting a 15-month digital ethnography of an emerging South African xenophobic (online) community, the so-called ‘Put South Africans First’ movement. Aiming to understand the narrative construction of social reality in this group, data gained from the Put South Africans First Facebook page were triangulated with interviews conducted with the leadership of the Put South Africans First movement. Two narratives that are constitutive for this group will be analysed: the story of the ‘harmfulness of Pan-Africanism’ and the conspiracy of a ‘modern-day slavery’. Drawing on a perspective that emphasises the entanglement between the emotional, the narrative and the digital in contemporary forms of xenophobia, the article exposes the working of these two key narratives. The narrative of the ‘harmfulness of Pan-Africanism’ draws on the recycling of colonial stereotypes, the affect of disgust, and on the technique of reappropriating and weaponising history. In contrast, the narrative of ‘modern-day slavery’ is fuelled by a belief in replacement conspiracies and a dystopic longing into the future, where future generations of South African children have become enslaved by ‘foreigners’. The article concludes by pointing out some of the specifics of the South African case in relation to xenophobic mobilisations in other parts of the world.","PeriodicalId":47703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southern African Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southern African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2023.2170126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the arrival of the Covid-19 pandemic in South Africa, a shift has taken place in the organisation of xenophobia as xenophobic activism has adapted to the pandemic and increasingly moved ‘online’. While a large scholarship on the various aspects of ‘offline’ xenophobia in contemporary South Africa has been produced, the recent intensification of online xenophobic activism during the pandemic remains an under-researched topic. The present study sets out to challenge this lack of attention given to online xenophobia in South Africa by conducting a 15-month digital ethnography of an emerging South African xenophobic (online) community, the so-called ‘Put South Africans First’ movement. Aiming to understand the narrative construction of social reality in this group, data gained from the Put South Africans First Facebook page were triangulated with interviews conducted with the leadership of the Put South Africans First movement. Two narratives that are constitutive for this group will be analysed: the story of the ‘harmfulness of Pan-Africanism’ and the conspiracy of a ‘modern-day slavery’. Drawing on a perspective that emphasises the entanglement between the emotional, the narrative and the digital in contemporary forms of xenophobia, the article exposes the working of these two key narratives. The narrative of the ‘harmfulness of Pan-Africanism’ draws on the recycling of colonial stereotypes, the affect of disgust, and on the technique of reappropriating and weaponising history. In contrast, the narrative of ‘modern-day slavery’ is fuelled by a belief in replacement conspiracies and a dystopic longing into the future, where future generations of South African children have become enslaved by ‘foreigners’. The article concludes by pointing out some of the specifics of the South African case in relation to xenophobic mobilisations in other parts of the world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“把南非人放在第一位”:理解南非正在兴起的仇外心理(网络)社区
随着新冠肺炎疫情在南非的到来,仇外心理组织发生了转变,仇外活动已适应疫情,并越来越多地转移到“网上”。尽管已经就当代南非“线下”仇外心理的各个方面进行了大量研究,但最近疫情期间网上仇外活动的加剧仍然是一个研究不足的话题。本研究旨在通过对一个新兴的南非仇外(在线)社区进行为期15个月的数字民族志研究,即所谓的“把南非人放在首位”运动,来挑战南非对网络仇外现象缺乏关注的现状。为了理解这一群体中社会现实的叙事结构,从“把南非人放在第一位”Facebook页面获得的数据与“把南非人为第一位”运动领导人的采访进行了三角测量。将分析构成这一群体的两种叙事:“泛非主义的危害性”的故事和“现代奴隶制”的阴谋。文章从一个角度强调了当代仇外心理形式中情感、叙事和数字之间的纠缠,揭示了这两个关键叙事的作用。“泛非主义的危害性”的叙事借鉴了殖民刻板印象的循环、厌恶的影响,以及重新利用和武器化历史的技巧。相比之下,“现代奴隶制”的叙事是由对替代阴谋的信仰和对未来的反乌托邦渴望所推动的,在未来,南非的后代儿童已经被“外国人”奴役。文章最后指出了南非案件与世界其他地区仇外动员有关的一些细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Journal of Southern African Studies is an international publication for work of high academic quality on issues of interest and concern in the region of Southern Africa. It aims at generating fresh scholarly enquiry and rigorous exposition in the many different disciplines of the social sciences and humanities, and periodically organises and supports conferences to this end, sometimes in the region. It seeks to encourage inter-disciplinary analysis, strong comparative perspectives and research that reflects new theoretical or methodological approaches. An active advisory board and an editor based in the region demonstrate our close ties with scholars there and our commitment to promoting research in the region.
期刊最新文献
One Livelihood Risk Factor Too Many? How Unintended Impacts of Conservation Contribute to Food Insecurity in Kavango Zambezi, Southern Africa Using Written Consent Forms When Conducting Non-Elite Qualitative Research: Reflections from Zambia Letting subalterns speak: localising the Sharpeville massacre The environment, capital and the politics of race in South Africa Land, Labour and Liberation: The Political Ecology of Southern Africa’s Unresolved Tensions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1