Lawyers, mental illness, admission and misconduct

IF 1.4 Q1 LAW Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.1080/1460728x.2019.1692510
P. Baron, L. Corbin
{"title":"Lawyers, mental illness, admission and misconduct","authors":"P. Baron, L. Corbin","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2019.1692510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since 2004 in Australia, there has been a significant amount of interest in the issues of lawyers and mental illness. As a result there is now a substantial body of literature that examines legal education and its links to lawyer distress. In the profession, there has been a growing awareness of lawyer mental illness and the growth of professional development and lawyer support. Less attention, however has been paid to the links between mental illness and misconduct and the ways in which mental illness is treated in disciplinary proceedings. This article seeks to address this gap by examining cases of disciplinary misconduct over the past 10 years in which mental illness is raised as a causal or a contributing factor. We have found that the law relating to mental illness and misconduct is still developing. Our analysis finds that courts and tribunals are, overall, sensitive to lawyer mental illness and that they are achieving an appropriate balance between the rights of the lawyer and protecting those of the public and the reputation of the legal profession. The paper will draw out the principles currently being used by the courts to assess the effects and implications of a lawyer’s mental illness on claims of misconduct.","PeriodicalId":42194,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ethics","volume":"22 1","pages":"28 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1460728x.2019.1692510","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2019.1692510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Since 2004 in Australia, there has been a significant amount of interest in the issues of lawyers and mental illness. As a result there is now a substantial body of literature that examines legal education and its links to lawyer distress. In the profession, there has been a growing awareness of lawyer mental illness and the growth of professional development and lawyer support. Less attention, however has been paid to the links between mental illness and misconduct and the ways in which mental illness is treated in disciplinary proceedings. This article seeks to address this gap by examining cases of disciplinary misconduct over the past 10 years in which mental illness is raised as a causal or a contributing factor. We have found that the law relating to mental illness and misconduct is still developing. Our analysis finds that courts and tribunals are, overall, sensitive to lawyer mental illness and that they are achieving an appropriate balance between the rights of the lawyer and protecting those of the public and the reputation of the legal profession. The paper will draw out the principles currently being used by the courts to assess the effects and implications of a lawyer’s mental illness on claims of misconduct.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
律师,精神疾病,认罪和不当行为
自2004年以来,在澳大利亚,人们对律师和精神疾病的问题产生了极大的兴趣。因此,现在有大量的文献研究法律教育及其与律师困境的联系。在律师行业,人们对律师精神疾病的认识和对律师专业发展的支持越来越多。然而,对精神疾病与不当行为之间的联系以及在纪律程序中对待精神疾病的方式的关注较少。这篇文章试图通过检查过去10年的纪律不端案件来解决这一差距,在这些案件中,精神疾病被认为是一个因果或促成因素。我们发现,有关精神疾病和不当行为的法律仍在发展中。我们的分析发现,总的来说,法院和法庭对律师的精神疾病很敏感,他们在律师的权利和保护公众的权利以及法律职业的声誉之间取得了适当的平衡。该文件将列出法院目前使用的原则,以评估律师的精神疾病对不当行为索赔的影响和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Between Continuity and Change in the Italian Legal Profession – Boutique Law Firms as the Last Bastion of Professionalism Liberal egalitarianism and critical legal studies: articles of conciliation Consequentialism and problem of role morality in legal ethics Should judges be temperate in their speech? Loyalty to client, conviction, or constitution? The moral responsibility of public professionals under illiberal state pressures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1