Prognostic significance of lymph node yield on oncologic outcomes according to tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients.

IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of Coloproctology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-28 DOI:10.3393/ac.2022.00143.0020
Hyo Seon Ryu, In Ja Park, Bo Kyung Ahn, Min Young Park, Min Sung Kim, Young Il Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Jin Cheon Kim
{"title":"Prognostic significance of lymph node yield on oncologic outcomes according to tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients.","authors":"Hyo Seon Ryu,&nbsp;In Ja Park,&nbsp;Bo Kyung Ahn,&nbsp;Min Young Park,&nbsp;Min Sung Kim,&nbsp;Young Il Kim,&nbsp;Seok-Byung Lim,&nbsp;Jin Cheon Kim","doi":"10.3393/ac.2022.00143.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of lymph node yield (LNY) for survival outcomes according to tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) in patients with rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary center. A total of 1,240 patients with clinical stage II or III rectal cancer who underwent curative resection after PCRT between 2007 and 2016 were included. Patients were categorized into the good response group (tumor regression grade [TRG], 0-1) or poor response group (TRG, 2-3). Propensity score matching was performed for age, sex, and pathologic stage between LNY of ≥12 and LNY of <12 within tumor response group. The primary outcome was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LNY and positive lymph nodes were inversely correlated with TRG. In good responders, 5-year DFS and 5-year OS of patients with LNY of <12 were better than those with LNY of ≥12, but there was no statistical significance. In poor responders, the LNY of <12 group had worse survival outcomes than the LNY of ≥12 group, but there was also no statistical significance. LNY of ≥12 was not associated with DFS and OS in multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LNY of <12 showed contrasting outcomes between the good and poor responders in 5-year DFS and OS. LNY of 12 may not imply adequate oncologic surgery or proper staging in rectal cancer patients treated by PCRT. Furthermore, a decrease in LNY should be comprehended differently according to tumor response.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626326/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00143.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of lymph node yield (LNY) for survival outcomes according to tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) in patients with rectal cancer.

Methods: This study was a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary center. A total of 1,240 patients with clinical stage II or III rectal cancer who underwent curative resection after PCRT between 2007 and 2016 were included. Patients were categorized into the good response group (tumor regression grade [TRG], 0-1) or poor response group (TRG, 2-3). Propensity score matching was performed for age, sex, and pathologic stage between LNY of ≥12 and LNY of <12 within tumor response group. The primary outcome was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results: LNY and positive lymph nodes were inversely correlated with TRG. In good responders, 5-year DFS and 5-year OS of patients with LNY of <12 were better than those with LNY of ≥12, but there was no statistical significance. In poor responders, the LNY of <12 group had worse survival outcomes than the LNY of ≥12 group, but there was also no statistical significance. LNY of ≥12 was not associated with DFS and OS in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: LNY of <12 showed contrasting outcomes between the good and poor responders in 5-year DFS and OS. LNY of 12 may not imply adequate oncologic surgery or proper staging in rectal cancer patients treated by PCRT. Furthermore, a decrease in LNY should be comprehended differently according to tumor response.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直肠癌患者术前放化疗后肿瘤反应对肿瘤预后的影响。
目的本研究旨在根据直肠癌患者术前放化疗(PCRT)后肿瘤反应评估淋巴结生成量(LNY)对生存结局的预测价值。方法采用回顾性研究方法,在某三级医疗中心进行。在2007年至2016年期间,共有1240例临床II期或III期直肠癌患者在PCRT后接受了治愈性切除术。将患者分为良好反应组(肿瘤消退等级[TRG], 0-1)和不良反应组(TRG, 2-3)。肿瘤反应组LNY≥12与LNY <12的患者进行年龄、性别、病理分期倾向评分匹配。主要终点是5年无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果slny、阳性淋巴结与TRG呈负相关。在良好应答者中,LNY <12的患者5年DFS和5年OS优于LNY≥12的患者,但差异无统计学意义。在不良应答者中,LNY <12组的生存结局较LNY≥12组差,但差异无统计学意义。在多变量分析中,LNY≥12与DFS和OS无相关性。结论lny <12在5年DFS和OS中表现出良好和不良反应的差异。12的LNY可能并不意味着接受PCRT治疗的直肠癌患者有足够的肿瘤手术或适当的分期。此外,LNY的降低应根据肿瘤反应进行不同的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Analysis of adenoma detection rate of colonoscopy among trainees. Colonic stenting: is the bridge to surgery worth its cost? A cost-effectiveness analysis at a single Asian institution. Oncologic outcomes and associated factors of colon cancer patients aged 70 years and older. Colorectal screening following appendectomy in adult patients: a systematic review. Dissection layer selection based on an understanding of pelvic fascial anatomy in transanal total mesorectal excision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1