{"title":"Book Review: Sporting Superpower: An Insider's View on China's Quest to Be the Best by Mark Dreyer","authors":"D. Plekhanov","doi":"10.1177/0920203X231180070c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and three metropoles, as well as on only young gay men, similarly adds to the clarity and coherence of the book. It also makes one curious about how tongzhi cultures are shaped in the countryside, or among different ‘minorities’. Finally, the book clearly focuses on cisgender gay men, the slowly expanding acronym LGBTQAI+ that prompts a likeminded study of, for example, lesbian and transcultures. After reading Kong’s book, this reviewer feels that he got to know the research participants intimately and to understand their life struggles and aspirations. The book unpacks and probes deep into the curious and often quite hidden entanglement between politics, family, community, locality, gender, and sexuality – all the more urgent, given the increasingly tense geopolitics of the three locales. This is a remarkable achievement for an academic book. Kong successfully steers away from using the three localities as an empirical case to apply Western theory, just as he is critical about assumed indigenous categories or claims to knowledge. As such, the book helps to decolonize not only sexuality and queer studies, but also to decolonize (and to queer) China studies. For anyone working on sexual cultures in East Asia and beyond, this book is essential reading. Its readability and clarity, and profoundly personal style of writing, without compromising on theoretical depth, also make it highly recommended for teaching purposes.","PeriodicalId":45809,"journal":{"name":"China Information","volume":"37 1","pages":"304 - 305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Information","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X231180070c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
and three metropoles, as well as on only young gay men, similarly adds to the clarity and coherence of the book. It also makes one curious about how tongzhi cultures are shaped in the countryside, or among different ‘minorities’. Finally, the book clearly focuses on cisgender gay men, the slowly expanding acronym LGBTQAI+ that prompts a likeminded study of, for example, lesbian and transcultures. After reading Kong’s book, this reviewer feels that he got to know the research participants intimately and to understand their life struggles and aspirations. The book unpacks and probes deep into the curious and often quite hidden entanglement between politics, family, community, locality, gender, and sexuality – all the more urgent, given the increasingly tense geopolitics of the three locales. This is a remarkable achievement for an academic book. Kong successfully steers away from using the three localities as an empirical case to apply Western theory, just as he is critical about assumed indigenous categories or claims to knowledge. As such, the book helps to decolonize not only sexuality and queer studies, but also to decolonize (and to queer) China studies. For anyone working on sexual cultures in East Asia and beyond, this book is essential reading. Its readability and clarity, and profoundly personal style of writing, without compromising on theoretical depth, also make it highly recommended for teaching purposes.
期刊介绍:
China Information presents timely and in-depth analyses of major developments in contemporary China and overseas Chinese communities in the areas of politics, economics, law, ecology, culture, and society, including literature and the arts. China Information pays special attention to views and areas that do not receive sufficient attention in the mainstream discourse on contemporary China. It encourages discussion and debate between different academic traditions, offers a platform to express controversial and dissenting opinions, and promotes research that is historically sensitive and contemporarily relevant.