Probing archivists’ perceptions and practices in privacy

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Archives and Records-The Journal of the Archives and Records Association Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI:10.1080/23257962.2022.2073207
Virginia A. Dressler, Jodi Kearns
{"title":"Probing archivists’ perceptions and practices in privacy","authors":"Virginia A. Dressler, Jodi Kearns","doi":"10.1080/23257962.2022.2073207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Archivists participated in a survey to help provide insight around privacy and practice. The practitioners’ responses are bespeckled with varying levels of real-worklife experience with sensitive, private, and vulnerable archival information. The survey included some demographic questions as well as hypothetical scenarios, which prompted respondents to think about how they would respond in their professional capacities if these analogue, reformatted, or born-digital documents were under their stewardship, and invited respondents to share their own professional anecdotes of privacy practices. The survey and adjoining paper attempt to address two research questions, namely that around archivists’ decision-making in privacy issues in digitized collections, and if institutional policy informs practice. Responses indicate a variability in privacy practices specifically and in the concept of privacy broadly within the American organizations represented. Most archivists surveyed indicate they address privacy as a regular part of their practice, though we found very few had guiding practices or policies. Absence of targeted policy around privacy decision-making is prevalent in archives in the respondents’ institutions. Discussion around survey results is shared to serve as a springboard for informing policy-driven privacy practice, including recommendations for future research and some suggested resources.","PeriodicalId":42972,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Records-The Journal of the Archives and Records Association","volume":"44 1","pages":"175 - 201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives and Records-The Journal of the Archives and Records Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2022.2073207","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Archivists participated in a survey to help provide insight around privacy and practice. The practitioners’ responses are bespeckled with varying levels of real-worklife experience with sensitive, private, and vulnerable archival information. The survey included some demographic questions as well as hypothetical scenarios, which prompted respondents to think about how they would respond in their professional capacities if these analogue, reformatted, or born-digital documents were under their stewardship, and invited respondents to share their own professional anecdotes of privacy practices. The survey and adjoining paper attempt to address two research questions, namely that around archivists’ decision-making in privacy issues in digitized collections, and if institutional policy informs practice. Responses indicate a variability in privacy practices specifically and in the concept of privacy broadly within the American organizations represented. Most archivists surveyed indicate they address privacy as a regular part of their practice, though we found very few had guiding practices or policies. Absence of targeted policy around privacy decision-making is prevalent in archives in the respondents’ institutions. Discussion around survey results is shared to serve as a springboard for informing policy-driven privacy practice, including recommendations for future research and some suggested resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探究档案管理员在隐私方面的认知和实践
档案工作者参与了一项调查,以帮助提供有关隐私和实践的见解。从业人员的反应被不同程度的真实工作经验和敏感的、私人的、脆弱的档案信息所点缀。该调查包括一些人口统计问题以及假设的场景,这促使受访者思考,如果这些模拟、重新格式化或生成的数字文档在他们的管理之下,他们将如何以专业能力做出回应,并邀请受访者分享他们自己在隐私实践方面的专业轶事。调查和相邻的论文试图解决两个研究问题,即围绕档案管理员在数字化馆藏隐私问题上的决策,以及机构政策是否通知实践。回应表明,在所代表的美国组织中,具体的隐私实践和广泛的隐私概念存在差异。大多数接受调查的档案管理员表示,他们将隐私作为日常工作的一部分,尽管我们发现很少有指导实践或政策。在受访者所在机构的档案中,普遍缺乏针对性的隐私决策政策。围绕调查结果的讨论将作为一个跳板,为政策驱动的隐私实践提供信息,包括对未来研究的建议和一些建议的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
The Remaking of Archival Values The Remaking of Archival Values , by Victoria Hoyle, Oxford, Routledge, 2023, xv + 225pp., £120 (hardback) ISBN: 978-0-367-47867-4 Exhibiting the Archive: Space, Encounter, and Experience Defining ‘proper research’: privileged access, local authority archives and the academic researcher The Register of the Goldsmiths’ Company: Deeds and Documents, c. 1190 to c. 1666, 3 Volumes The handbook of archival practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1