Stimulan® Antibiotic Impregnated Beads for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infection

Hazel Wai Chon, M. Hamish, P. Kirupananthan, Aimen Gmati, Hiba Abdalla, R. Hicks
{"title":"Stimulan® Antibiotic Impregnated Beads for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infection","authors":"Hazel Wai Chon, M. Hamish, P. Kirupananthan, Aimen Gmati, Hiba Abdalla, R. Hicks","doi":"10.4103/AJIR.AJIR_9_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Limited evidence has been found on the effectiveness of Stimulan® antibiotic beads for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Stimulan® antibiotic beads in treating diabetic foot infection and review the healing rate, infection recurrence rate, and the length of postoperative hospital stay. Settings and Design: It was a retrospective review of patients implanted with Stimulan® antibiotic beads at a district general hospital in England from 2017 to 2019. Subjects and Methods: Nineteen patients with Wagner Grade 3 and 4 ulcers were included, with a mean age of 62.3 years. Stimulan®, an antibiotic loaded absorbable calcium sulfate biocomposite, was used to treat persistent diabetic foot infection with chronic osteomyelitis. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common bacteria isolated. Exclusion criteria consisted of those with Wagner Grade 1 or 2 ulcers and infections that had clinically responded to long courses of systemic antibiotics treatment. Results: All patients underwent local wound debridement with the application of Stimulan® beads and received intravenous antibiotics for 48 h postoperatively. The average postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. After 1 month of follow-up, 16 wounds (84%) fully healed, two wounds (11%) had partially healed, and one wound (5%) showed no sign of healing. Two patients (11%) had shown recurrence of diabetic foot infection in a different foot after 24 months. Amputation rate was 0% over 24 months. Conclusions: This study recorded the clinical efficacy of Stimulan® antibiotic beads by demonstrating 0% amputation rate after two years and shortened hospital stay. With a low recurrence rate (16%), Stimulan® beads could be considered as one of the alternative treatments in managing diabetic foot infection.","PeriodicalId":32940,"journal":{"name":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","volume":"4 1","pages":"073 - 078"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/AJIR.AJIR_9_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Context: Limited evidence has been found on the effectiveness of Stimulan® antibiotic beads for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Stimulan® antibiotic beads in treating diabetic foot infection and review the healing rate, infection recurrence rate, and the length of postoperative hospital stay. Settings and Design: It was a retrospective review of patients implanted with Stimulan® antibiotic beads at a district general hospital in England from 2017 to 2019. Subjects and Methods: Nineteen patients with Wagner Grade 3 and 4 ulcers were included, with a mean age of 62.3 years. Stimulan®, an antibiotic loaded absorbable calcium sulfate biocomposite, was used to treat persistent diabetic foot infection with chronic osteomyelitis. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common bacteria isolated. Exclusion criteria consisted of those with Wagner Grade 1 or 2 ulcers and infections that had clinically responded to long courses of systemic antibiotics treatment. Results: All patients underwent local wound debridement with the application of Stimulan® beads and received intravenous antibiotics for 48 h postoperatively. The average postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. After 1 month of follow-up, 16 wounds (84%) fully healed, two wounds (11%) had partially healed, and one wound (5%) showed no sign of healing. Two patients (11%) had shown recurrence of diabetic foot infection in a different foot after 24 months. Amputation rate was 0% over 24 months. Conclusions: This study recorded the clinical efficacy of Stimulan® antibiotic beads by demonstrating 0% amputation rate after two years and shortened hospital stay. With a low recurrence rate (16%), Stimulan® beads could be considered as one of the alternative treatments in managing diabetic foot infection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stimulan®抗生素浸渍珠治疗糖尿病足感染
背景:有限的证据已发现的刺激®抗生素珠治疗糖尿病足溃疡的有效性。目的:本研究的目的是评价刺激霉素®抗生素微球治疗糖尿病足感染的安全性和有效性,并回顾其治愈率、感染复发率和术后住院时间。设置与设计:回顾性研究了2017年至2019年在英国一家地区综合医院植入兴奋剂®抗生素珠的患者。对象和方法:纳入19例Wagner 3级和4级溃疡患者,平均年龄62.3岁。刺激蛋白是一种含有抗生素的可吸收硫酸钙生物复合材料,用于治疗持续性糖尿病足感染并慢性骨髓炎。金黄色葡萄球菌是最常见的分离细菌。排除标准包括瓦格纳1级或2级溃疡和感染,对长期全身性抗生素治疗有临床反应。结果:所有患者均行局部伤口清创,术后48 h应用刺激物®微球,并静脉注射抗生素。术后平均住院时间为2天。随访1个月后,16例(84%)创面完全愈合,2例(11%)创面部分愈合,1例(5%)创面无愈合迹象。2例患者(11%)在24个月后另一只脚出现糖尿病足感染复发。24个月内截肢率为0%。结论:本研究通过两年后截肢率为0%,缩短住院时间,记录了刺激霉素®抗生素微球的临床疗效。由于复发率低(16%),刺激蛋白珠可作为治疗糖尿病足感染的替代治疗方法之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Keynote PAIRS2024: The Diamond Jubilee of Interventional Radiology, Reflection on the Era of Modernizing Medicine: Our Wins, Losses, and Future Opportunities… Complication Rate of Percutaneous Balloon-Retention versus Locking-Loop Gastrostomy and Gastrojejunostomy Tube Insertion: A Comparison from a Canadian Tertiary Care Centre Ischemic Stroke Post-Transradial Chemoembolization Minimizing the Pain of Local Anesthesia Administration in Interventional Radiology with an Anesthetic Portal Technique Prophylactic Antibiotic Use Prior to Port Placement and Its Effect on Insertion-Related Infection Rates: A Five-Year Retrospective Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1