A cavity-based micromechanical model for the shear band failure in metallic glasses under arbitrary stress states

IF 2.6 4区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS Journal of Applied Mechanics-Transactions of the Asme Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI:10.1115/1.4062724
Yanfei Gao
{"title":"A cavity-based micromechanical model for the shear band failure in metallic glasses under arbitrary stress states","authors":"Yanfei Gao","doi":"10.1115/1.4062724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Deformation and fracture of metallic glasses are often modeled by stress-based criteria which often incorporate some sorts of pressure dependence. However, detailed mechanisms that are responsible for the shear band formation and the entire damage initiation and evolution process are complex and the origin of such a pressure dependence is obscure. Here we argue that the shear band formation results from the constitutive instability, so that the shear-band angle and arrangements can be easily related to the macroscopic constitutive parameters such as internal friction and dilatancy factor. This is one reason for the observed tension-compression asymmetry in metallic glasses. The free volume coalescence leads to precipitous formation of voids or cavities inside the shear bands, and the intrinsic “ductility” is therefore governed by the growth of these cavities. Based on a generalized Stokes-Hookean analogy, we can derive the critical shear-band failure strain with respect to the applied stress triaxiality, in which the cavity evolution scenarios are sharply different between tension-controlled and shear/compression-dominated conditions. This is another possible reason for the tension-compression asymmetry. It is noted that diffusive-controlled cavity growth could also be the rate-determining process, as suggested by the recent measurements of shear-band diffusivity and viscosity that turn out to satisfy the Stokes-Einstein relationship. This constitutes the third possible reason for the tension-compression asymmetry.","PeriodicalId":54880,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Mechanics-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Mechanics-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4062724","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deformation and fracture of metallic glasses are often modeled by stress-based criteria which often incorporate some sorts of pressure dependence. However, detailed mechanisms that are responsible for the shear band formation and the entire damage initiation and evolution process are complex and the origin of such a pressure dependence is obscure. Here we argue that the shear band formation results from the constitutive instability, so that the shear-band angle and arrangements can be easily related to the macroscopic constitutive parameters such as internal friction and dilatancy factor. This is one reason for the observed tension-compression asymmetry in metallic glasses. The free volume coalescence leads to precipitous formation of voids or cavities inside the shear bands, and the intrinsic “ductility” is therefore governed by the growth of these cavities. Based on a generalized Stokes-Hookean analogy, we can derive the critical shear-band failure strain with respect to the applied stress triaxiality, in which the cavity evolution scenarios are sharply different between tension-controlled and shear/compression-dominated conditions. This is another possible reason for the tension-compression asymmetry. It is noted that diffusive-controlled cavity growth could also be the rate-determining process, as suggested by the recent measurements of shear-band diffusivity and viscosity that turn out to satisfy the Stokes-Einstein relationship. This constitutes the third possible reason for the tension-compression asymmetry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于空腔的任意应力状态下金属玻璃剪切带破坏微观力学模型
金属玻璃的变形和断裂通常采用基于应力的准则来建模,这些准则通常包含一些压力依赖性。然而,导致剪切带形成和整个损伤发生和演化过程的详细机制是复杂的,而且这种压力依赖性的来源尚不清楚。本文认为剪切带的形成是本构失稳的结果,因此剪切带的角度和排列可以很容易地与内摩擦和剪胀系数等宏观本构参数联系起来。这是在金属玻璃中观察到的拉压不对称的一个原因。自由体积聚并导致剪切带内的空洞或空腔的急剧形成,因此这些空腔的生长控制了固有的“延性”。基于广义Stokes-Hookean类比,我们可以推导出相对于应力三轴性的临界剪切带破坏应变,其中在拉伸控制和剪切/压缩主导的条件下,空腔演化情景明显不同。这是拉压不对称的另一个可能原因。值得注意的是,扩散控制的空腔生长也可能是速率决定过程,正如最近对剪切带扩散率和粘度的测量所表明的那样,它们最终满足斯托克斯-爱因斯坦关系。这构成了拉压不对称的第三个可能原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
95
审稿时长
5.8 months
期刊介绍: All areas of theoretical and applied mechanics including, but not limited to: Aerodynamics; Aeroelasticity; Biomechanics; Boundary layers; Composite materials; Computational mechanics; Constitutive modeling of materials; Dynamics; Elasticity; Experimental mechanics; Flow and fracture; Heat transport in fluid flows; Hydraulics; Impact; Internal flow; Mechanical properties of materials; Mechanics of shocks; Micromechanics; Nanomechanics; Plasticity; Stress analysis; Structures; Thermodynamics of materials and in flowing fluids; Thermo-mechanics; Turbulence; Vibration; Wave propagation
期刊最新文献
FAST OPTIMAL DESIGN OF SHELL-GRADED-INFILL STRUCTURES WITH EXPLICIT BOUNDARY BY A HYBRID MMC-AABH PLUS APPROACH The role of frequency and impedance contrasts in bandgap closing and formation patterns of axially-vibrating phononic crystals Head Injuries Induced by Tennis Ball Impacts: A Computational Study Experimental Validation of Reconstructed Microstructure via Deep Learning in Discontinuous Fiber Platelet Composite A Non-contact Method for Estimating Thin Metal Film Adhesion Strength through Current Induced Void Growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1