Shadow education as an emerging focus in worldwide curriculum studies

IF 0.1 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Curriculum Matters Pub Date : 2018-12-12 DOI:10.18296/CM.0027
Young Chun Kim, N. Gough, Jung-Hoon Jung
{"title":"Shadow education as an emerging focus in worldwide curriculum studies","authors":"Young Chun Kim, N. Gough, Jung-Hoon Jung","doi":"10.18296/CM.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shadow education has been studied in areas such as comparative education, educational policy, sociology of education, education and economics, and lifelong education, but mainstream Anglophone curriculum studies have largely ignored this phenomenon. We argue that shadow education should be considered as an emerging (and significant) focus of curriculum studies worldwide and advance five approaches to studying shadow education as an object of transnational curriculum inquiry, including shadow education as historical/political text, auto/biographical text, critical text, ethnic text, and decolonising text. We argue that, because shadow education seems likely to expand, curriculum scholars should seek new understandings that might complicate and complexify both shadow education and mainstream curriculum discourses. example, a relatively recent shadow education-related cultural phenomenon emerges in Park et al.’s (2015, p. 5) study of South Korean “Gangnam mothers”, who work individually or collectively to find the best education-related information in order to get their child the most suitable educational support. One implication of their study for understanding shadow education as decolonising text is that it is a space in which multiple agents create a new culture of education through active engagement with others. How this emerging culture will affect or interact with shadow education is largely a matter of speculation. Representing shadow education in South Korea as “educational fever” is a Western (i.e., colonialist) construction of the Other which we need to go beyond. In this respect, the strategies that indigenous peoples can use in decolonising research methodologies (see, for example, Smith, 2013) might also inform the project of understanding shadow education as decolonising text.","PeriodicalId":37874,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Matters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Matters","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18296/CM.0027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Shadow education has been studied in areas such as comparative education, educational policy, sociology of education, education and economics, and lifelong education, but mainstream Anglophone curriculum studies have largely ignored this phenomenon. We argue that shadow education should be considered as an emerging (and significant) focus of curriculum studies worldwide and advance five approaches to studying shadow education as an object of transnational curriculum inquiry, including shadow education as historical/political text, auto/biographical text, critical text, ethnic text, and decolonising text. We argue that, because shadow education seems likely to expand, curriculum scholars should seek new understandings that might complicate and complexify both shadow education and mainstream curriculum discourses. example, a relatively recent shadow education-related cultural phenomenon emerges in Park et al.’s (2015, p. 5) study of South Korean “Gangnam mothers”, who work individually or collectively to find the best education-related information in order to get their child the most suitable educational support. One implication of their study for understanding shadow education as decolonising text is that it is a space in which multiple agents create a new culture of education through active engagement with others. How this emerging culture will affect or interact with shadow education is largely a matter of speculation. Representing shadow education in South Korea as “educational fever” is a Western (i.e., colonialist) construction of the Other which we need to go beyond. In this respect, the strategies that indigenous peoples can use in decolonising research methodologies (see, for example, Smith, 2013) might also inform the project of understanding shadow education as decolonising text.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影子教育是国际课程研究的一个新兴热点
影子教育在比较教育、教育政策、教育社会学、教育与经济学、终身教育等领域都有研究,但主流英语国家课程研究在很大程度上忽视了这一现象。我们认为影子教育应被视为全球课程研究的新兴(和重要)焦点,并提出了五种方法来研究影子教育作为跨国课程探究的对象,包括影子教育作为历史/政治文本、汽车/传记文本、批评文本、种族文本和非殖民化文本。我们认为,由于影子教育似乎有可能扩大,课程学者应该寻求可能使影子教育和主流课程话语复杂化和复杂化的新理解。例如,Park等人(2015,p. 5)对韩国“江南妈妈”的研究中出现了一种相对较新的影子教育相关文化现象,她们单独或集体地寻找与教育相关的最佳信息,以便为孩子提供最合适的教育支持。他们的研究将影子教育理解为非殖民化文本的一个含义是,它是一个空间,在这个空间中,多个主体通过与他人的积极参与创造了一种新的教育文化。这种新兴文化将如何影响或互动影子教育在很大程度上是一个猜测问题。将韩国的影子教育描述为“教育热”是西方(即殖民主义)对他者的建构,我们需要超越。在这方面,土著人民可以在非殖民化研究方法中使用的策略(例如,参见Smith, 2013)也可以为将影子教育理解为非殖民化文本的项目提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculum Matters
Curriculum Matters Social Sciences-Education
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Published annually, this peer-reviewed journal provides an avenue for discussion, commentary and information about curriculum. The full archive of back issues is available.
期刊最新文献
Editorial An evidence-based approach to secondary school science: Online citizen science and the science capabilities Korean students’ transnational literacy and social networks in a business college Benefits of poetry: An argument for making poetry a required course for EFL literature majors Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1